Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:56:09.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic Prescriptions

Shifting Boundaries in Nineteenth-Century Disease and Cause-of-Death Classification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Jeffrey K. Beemer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The lack of a standardized cause-of-death nomenclature poses certain challenges for historical and demographic research of nineteenth-century mortality trends. Efforts to standardize disease and cause-of-death terminology did not successfully take place on an international level until the late nineteenth century. While many disease terms were in common, their diagnostic applications were not. This study examines the relative impact that standardized nomenclature had on cause-of-death reporting in western Massachusetts from 1850 through 1912. I analyze the effects of one specific international influence on late-nineteenth- and early twentieth-century grammars of death, namely, the organized efforts of European and American medical professionals to instruct physicians in proper nomenclature through explicit references and sanctions in the 1900 International Classification of Diseases (ICD). My analysis focuses on the problematic usage of two diagnostic terms in particular: puerperal fever and inanition. The qualifying instructions for these diseases are particularly important for U.S. studies, because they targeted U.S. physicians for correction and provide further insight into the institutional efforts to effect conventional, diagnostic usage on both an international and a local level. I show that the ICD‘s effect on cause-of-death reporting in Holyoke and Northampton was modest at best. The ICD correctives in question were not unilateral directives from the European medical establishment but in fact originated in the United States. The ICD developed as a collaborative endeavor, enlisting the efforts and interests of participating countries to help create a mechanism for implementing a standardized cause-of-death nomenclature capable of addressing international and local public health concerns.

Type
Special Section: Complexities of Nineteenth-Century Cause-of-Death Nomenclatures
Information
Social Science History , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , Fall 2009 , pp. 307 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Samuel W. (1897) “The vital statistics of Massachusetts: A forty years‘ summary, 1856–1895,” in Massachusetts, State Board of Health, Twenty-eighth Annual Report of the Massachusetts State Board of Health. Public Document No. 34. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
Alter, George, and Carmichael, Ann (1999) “Classifying the dead: Toward a history of the registration of causes of death.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 54: 114–32.Google Scholar
Anderton, Douglas L., and Leonard, Susan I.Hautaniemi(2004) “Grammars of death: An analysis of nineteenth-century literal causes of death from the age of miasmas to germ theory.” Social Science History 28: 111–43.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Peter (1999) Contagion and the State in Europe, 1830–1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Helen, and Swedlund, Alan C.(1996) “Poor women and bad mothers: Placing the blame for turn-of-the-century infant mortality.” Northeast Anthropology 52: 31–52.Google Scholar
Beemer, Jeffrey K., Anderton, Douglas L., and Hautaniemi, Susan I. (2005) “Sewers in the city: A case study of individual-level mortality and public health initiatives in Northampton, Massachusetts, at the turn of the century.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 60: 42–72.Google Scholar
Benson, Lucy Wilson (1954) “Floods and disasters,” in Tercentenary History Committee (ed.) The Northampton Book: Chapters from 300 Years in the Life of a New England Town, 1654–1954. Northampton, MA: Tercentenary Committee: 355–63.Google Scholar
Bynum, William F. (1993) “Nosology,” in Bynum, William F. and Porter, Roy (eds.) Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine, vol. 1. New York: Routledge: 335–56.Google Scholar
Carter, K. Codell (2003) The Rise of Causal Concepts of Disease: Case Histories. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
De Costa, Caroline M. (2002) “The contagiousness of childbed fever: A short history of puerperal sepsis and its treatment.” Medical Journal of Australia 177: 668–71.Google Scholar
DeLacy, Margaret (1999) “Nosology, mortality, and disease theory in the eighteenth century.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 54: 261–84.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Michael (2005) “William Farr and quantification in nineteenth-century English public health,” in Jorland, Gérard, Opinel, Annick, and Weisz, George (eds.) Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspectives. Montreal: McGill-Queen‘s University Press: 251–65.Google Scholar
Ettinger, Laura E. (2006) Nurse-Midwifery: The Birth of a New American Profession. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Eyler, John, (1979) Victorian Social Medicine: The Ideas and Methods of William Farr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Farr, William (1885 [1837]) Vital Statistics. London: Offices of the Sanitary Institute.Google Scholar
Flint, Austin (1867) A Treatise on the Principles and Practice of Medicine, Designed for the Use of Practitioners and Students of Medicine. Philadelphia: Lea.Google Scholar
Gehlke, C. E. (1910) “Publications of the American Statistical Association, 1908–1909.” American Statistical Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Graham, Edwin E. (1908) “Chairman‘s address before the Section on Diseases of Children, at the Fifty-ninth Annual Session, American Medical Association.” Journal of the American Medical Association 51: 1045–50.Google Scholar
Graunt, John (1939 [1662]) Natural and Political Observations Made upon the Bills of Mortality. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Constance McLaughlin (1939) Holyoke, Massachusetts: A Case History of the Industrial Revolution in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. (2003) “The great modern mortality transition.” Social Science History Association Newsletter, Winter, 1–22.Google Scholar
Hampshire Gazette and Northampton Courier (1881) February 22.Google Scholar
Hankins, F. H. (1954) “Economic transition: 1817–1860,” in Tercentenary History Committee (ed.) The Northampton Book: Chapters from 300 Years in the Life of a New England Town, 1654–1954. Northampton, MA: Tercentenary Committee: 77–84.Google Scholar
Hautaniemi, Susan I. (2002) “Demography and death in emergent industrial cities of New England.” PhD diss., University of Massachusetts–Amherst.Google Scholar
Hautaniemi, Susan I., Swedlund, Alan C., and Anderton, Douglas L. (1999) “Mill town mortality: Consequences of industrial growth in two nineteenth-century New England towns.” Social Science History 23: 1–39.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell(1843) “The contagiousness of puerperal fever.” New England Quarterly Journal of Medicine and Surgery 1: 503–30.Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I., Sigle, Wendy, and White, Michael J. (1999) “Childhood mortality and quality of care among abandoned children in nineteenth-century Italy.” Population Studies 53: 303–15.Google Scholar
Leonard, Susan Hautaniemi, Swedlund, Alan, and Rudzik, Alanna (2006) “A plurality of practices: Order and dis-order in the treatment and classification of disease in New England, 1830–1910.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Jose, CA, November 17.Google Scholar
Levene, Alysa (2006) “What can Dade registers tell us about infant mortality in the later eighteenth century?” Local Population Studies 76: 31–42.Google Scholar
Liptak, Dolores, and Bennett, Grace, eds. (1999) Seeds of Hope: The History of the Sisters of Providence, Holyoke, Massachusetts. Holyoke, MA: Sisters of Providence of Holyoke.Google Scholar
Loudon, Irvine (1992) Death in Childbirth: An International Study of Maternal Care and Maternal Mortality, 1800–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loudon, Irvine (1999) “The measurement of maternal mortality.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 54: 312–29.Google Scholar
McKeown, Thomas H. (1976) The Modern Rise of Population. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Meigs, Grace L. (1917) Maternal Mortality from All Conditions Connected with Childbirth in the United States and Certain Other Countries. U.S. Department of Labor, Children‘s Bureau. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pelling, Margaret (1978) Cholera, Fever, and English Medicine, 1825–1865. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, Barbara Gutmann (1972) Public Health and the State: Changing Views in Massachusetts, 1842–1936. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Secretary of the Commonwealth (1863) “Statistical Nosology: Adopted for Registration in Massachusetts,” in Twenty-second Report to the Legislature of Massachusetts, Relating to the Registry and Return of Births, Marriages, and Deaths, in the Commonwealth, for the Year Ending December 31, 1863. Public Document No. 1. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Elizabeth M. (2004) In the Shadow of the Dam: The Aftermath of the Mill River Flood of 1874. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. Kräupl (1979) The Concepts of Illness, Disease, and Morbus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Temkin, Owsei (1974) Galenism: Rise and Decline of a Medical Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Temkin, Owsei (1987) “The scientific approach to disease: Specific entity and individual sickness,” in Temkin, Owsei (ed.) The Double Face of Janus and Other Essays in the History of Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press: 441–55.Google Scholar
Tuttle, George M. (1899) A Manual for Students and Practitioners. New York: Lea.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1902) Manual of International Classification of Causes of Death. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1908) Mode of Statement of Cause of Death and Duration of Illness upon Certificates of Death. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1910) International Classification of Causes of Sickness and Death. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Marine-Hospital Service (1900) The International System of Nomenclature of Diseases and Causes of Death. Supplement to Public Health Reports XV (49). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wertz, Richard W., and Wertz, Dorothy C. (1977) Lying-In: A History of Childbirth in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Woods, Robert (1991) “Public health and public hygiene: The urban environment in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,” in Schofield, Roger, Reher, David, and Bideau, Alain (eds.) The Decline of Mortality in Europe. Oxford: Clarendon: 233.–47.Google Scholar
Worboys, Michael (2000) Spreading Germs: Disease Theories and Medical Practice in Britain, 1865–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2006) “History of the development of the ICD,” www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/HistoryOfICD.pdf.Google Scholar