Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:36:59.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contested Grasslands: Commons and the Unequal Land-Costs to Sustain Soil Fertility in Preindustrial Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2021

Dino Güldner Open the ORCID record for Dino Güldner [Opens in a new window]
Dino Güldner*
Affiliation:
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Social Ecology, Schottenfeldgasse 29, Vienna1070, Austria
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Maintaining soil fertility was the most pressing problem in preindustrial agriculture. Prior to the arrival of industrial inputs, farmers relied on ecological soil replenishment processes and biological fertilizing techniques to sustain the productivity of soil. Central European farmers actively managed the cycling of nutrients by keeping livestock. Farm animals provided the means to recycle nutrients from crop production and to transfer nutrients from land-use systems dedicated for biomass extraction, such as grasslands. This article explores the unequal distribution of these vital resources in the Manor Bruck, Austria, and its impact on landlord’s and peasant’s abilities to meet the “land costs” of sustaining soil fertility. The article tests the hypothesis as to whether inequality was a major driver for unsustainable farming practices and the degradation of agro-ecosystems in the long run. Focal points are commons and communal land-use systems and their role in cycling nutrients through the agricultural landscape. Commons in the Manor Bruck comprised vast grasslands, which provided an important ecological buffer to balance the continuous export of nutrients from crop production for all actors. The aim is to demonstrate how social conflict emerging from the competition over commons guides us to the specific sustainability challenges faced by farmers.

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 45 , Special Issue 4: Soils and Sustainability , Winter 2021 , pp. 625 - 655
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Robert C. (1992) Enclosure and the Yeoman: The Agricultural Development of the South Midlands 1450–1850. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C. (1999) “Tracking the agricultural revolution in England.” Economic History Review 52(2): 209–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C. (2005) “Landlords and economic development in England, 1450–1800,” in Paul, Janssens and Bartolomé Yun, Casalilla (eds.) European Aristocracy and Colonial Elites: Patrimonial Management Strategies and Economic Development, 15th–18th Centuries. Ashgate: 25–36.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert C. (2008) “The nitrogen hypothesis and the English agricultural revolution: A biological analysis.” Journal of Economic History 68(1): 182–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, Trevor H., and Philpin, Charles H. E., eds. (1985) The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BEV (Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen) (1830–1906) Katastralmappenarchiv, Franziszeischer Kataster und Fortführungsmappen: Parzellenprotokolle und Feldmappen: Bruck an der Leitha, Bruckneudorf, Parndorf, Neudorf.Google Scholar
Billen, Gilles, Garnier, Josette A., Vincent Thieu, Marie Silvestre, Sabine Barles, and Petros Chatzimpiros (2012) “Localising the nitrogen imprint of the Paris food supply: The potential of organic farming and changes in human Diet.” Biogeosciences 9(1): 607–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borras, Saturnino M. (2009) “Agrarian change and peasant studies: Changes, continuities and challenges—an Introduction.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boserup, Ester (1965) The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. Aldine Chicago.Google Scholar
Bouwman, Alexander F., Beusen, Arthur H. W., and Gilles, Billen (2009) “Human alteration of the global nitrogen and phosphorus soil balances for the period 1970–2050.” Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23(4): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettl, Herbert (2009) Herrschaft, Hof und Hofer: Sozioökonomische Betrachtung der Meierhöfe und der Landarbeiter im Bezirk Neusiedl am See. Amt der Burgenländischen Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Bruckmüller, Ernst (1977) Landwirtschaftliche Organisationen und Gesellschaftliche Modernisierung: Vereine, Genossenschaften und Politische Mobilisierung der Landwirtschaft Österreichs vom Vormärz bis 1914. Neugebauer.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto (1981) Land und Herrschaft: Grundfragen der Territorialen Verfassungsgeschichte Österreichs im Mittelalter. 5th ed. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Byres, Terence J. (1999) Capitalism from Above and Capitalism from Below: Essays in Comparative Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cerman, Markus (2012) Villagers and Lords in Eastern Europe, 1300–1800. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbacho, Bea (2017) “Intensification of a peasant agriculture and soil fertility in an Atlantic territory: Galicia, 1750–1900.” PhD diss., Santiago de Compostela University.Google Scholar
Curtis, Daniel (2016) “Did the commons make medieval and early modern rural societies more equitable? A survey of evidence from across Western Europe, 1300–1800.” Journal of Agrarian Change 16(4): 646–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cussó, Xavier, Garrabou, Ramon, and Tello, Enric (2006) “Social metabolism in an agrarian region of Catalonia (Spain) in 1860–1870: Flows, energy balance and land use.” Ecological Economics (58): 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Hongmin, Mangino, Joe, McAllister, Tim A., Jerry L. Hatfield, Donald E. Johnson, Keith R. Lassey, Magda Aparecida de Lima, and Anna Romanovskaya (2006) “Emissions from livestock and manure management,” in The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed.) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 4. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES): 10.1–10.87.Google Scholar
Drobesch, Werner (2003) Grundherrschaft und Bauer auf dem Weg zur Grundentlastung: die “Agrarrevolution” in den Innerösterreichischen Ländern. Verlag des Geschichtsvereines für Kärnten.Google Scholar
Ernst, August (1953) “Die ‘Neubestiftung’ von Neudorf b. Parndorf.” Burgenländische Heimatblätter 15(2): 70–73.Google Scholar
Feigl, Helmuth, ed. (1982) Studien und Forschungen aus dem Niederösterreichischen Institut Für Landeskunde. Vol 3, Die Auswirkungen der Theresianisch-Josephinischen Reformen auf die Landwirtschaft und die Ländliche Sozialstruktur Niederösterreichs. Selbstverlag des NÖ Instituts für Landeskunde.Google Scholar
Feigl, Helmuth, (1998) Die Niederösterreichische Grundherrschaft vom Ausgehenden Mittelalter bis zu den Theresianisch-Josephinischen Reformen. 2nd ed. Verein für Landeskunde von Niederösterreich.Google Scholar
Fischer-Kowalski, Marina, and Helmut, Haberl 1997. “Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung. Konzepte zur Beschreibung des Verhältnisses von Gesellschaft und Natur,” in Fischer-Kowalski, Marina, Haberl, Haberl, Walter, Hüttler, Harald, Payer, Heinz, Schandl, Verena, Winiwarter, and Helga, Zangerl-Weisz (eds.) Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur. Ein Versuch in Sozialer Ökologie. Fakultas: 3–12.Google Scholar
Fischer-Kowalski, Marina, and Helmut, Haberl eds. (2007) Socioecological Transitions and Global Change: Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Kowalski, Marina, Krausmann, Fridolin, Mayer, Andreas, and Schaffartzik, Anke. (2014) “Boserup’s theory on technological change as a point of departure for the theory of sociometabolic regime transitions,” in Marina Fischer-Kowalski, Anette Reenberg, Anke Schaffartzik, and Andreas Mayer (eds.) Ester Boserup’s Legacy on Sustainability. Springer Netherlands: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galán, Elena, Padró, Roc, Marco, Inés, Enric Tello, Geoff Cunfer, Gloria I. Guzmán, Manuel González de Molina et al. (2016) “Widening the analysis of energy return on investment (EROI) in agro-ecosystems: Socio-ecological transitions to industrialized farm Systems (the Vallès County, Catalonia, c.1860 and 1999).” Ecological Modelling (336): 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Ruiz, Roberto, de Molina, Manuel González, Gloria I. Guzmán, David Soto, and Juan Infante-Amate (2012) “Guidelines for constructing nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium balances in historical agricultural systems.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36(6): 650–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gizicki-Neundlinger, Michael, Gingrich, Simone, Güldner, Dino, Krausmann, Fridolin, and Enric Tello (2017) “Land, food and labour in pre-industrial agro-ecosystems: A socio-ecological perspective on early 19th century seigneurial systems.” Historia Agraria (71): 37–78.Google Scholar
Gliessman, Stephen R. (2007) Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. 2nd ed. CRC Press.Google Scholar
GML (Győr-Moson-Sopron County Megye Moson Levéltára) (1773–1848) Vármegyei Adóösszeírások és Adókezelési Iratok: Neudorf, Parndorf.Google Scholar
GML (Győr-Moson-Sopron County Megye Moson Levéltára) (1786–89) Györ-Moson Egyesitett Vármegye Területén Múködó Földmeresi: Bruck an der Leitha, Neudorf, Parndorf.Google Scholar
González de Molina, Manuel (2010) “A guide to studying the socio-ecological transition in European agriculture.” Documentos de Trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria (1006), https://ideas.repec.org/p/seh/wpaper/1006.html (accessed September 4, 2018).Google Scholar
González de Molina, Manuel, and Toledo, Víctor M. (2014) The Social Metabolism: A Socio-Ecological Theory of Historical Change. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götz, Bettina, and Gerhard, Zethner (1996) Regionale Stoffbilanzen in der Landwirtschaft: der Nährstoffhaushalt im Hinblick auf seine Umweltwirkung am Beispiel des Einzugsgebietes Strem. Umweltbundesamt.Google Scholar
Güldner, Dino, and Fridolin, Krausmann (2017) “Nutrient recycling and soil fertility management in the course of the industrial transition of traditional, organic agriculture: The case of Bruck Estate, 1787–1906.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment (249): 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güldner, Dino, Krausmann, Fridolin, and Winiwarter, Verena (2016) “From farm to gun and no way back: Habsburg gunpowder production in the eighteenth century and its impact on agriculture and soil fertility.” Regional Environmental Change 16(1): 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán, Casado, Gloria, I., and Manuel González, de Molina (2009) “Preindustrial agriculture versus organic agriculture.” Land Use Policy 26(2): 502–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán, Gloria I., Eduardo, Aguilera, Roberto, García-Ruiz, Eva, Torremocha, David, Soto-Fernández, Juan, Infante-Amate, and Manuel González, de Molina (2018) “The agrarian metabolism as a tool for assessing agrarian sustainability, and its application to Spanish agriculture (1960–2008).” Ecology and Society 23(1): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberl, Helmut, Winiwarter, Verena, Krister Andersson, Robert U. Ayres, Christopher Boone, Alicia Castillo, Geoff Cunfer et al. (2006) “From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research.” Ecology and Society 11 (2): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillinger, Franz. (2012) “Nowendorf - Neudorf. Lösung eines Rätsels.” Burgenländische Heimatblätter 74(1): 35–46.Google Scholar
Hitschmann, Hugo H. (1891) Vademecum für den Landwirth. M. Perles.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Alfred (1978) “Grundlagen der Agrarstruktur der Donaumonarchie,” in Alfred Hofmann (ed.) Sozial- und Wirtschaftshistorische Studien. Vol 10, Österreich-Ungarn als Agrarstaat. Wirtschaftliches Wachstum und Agrarverhältnisse in Österreich im 19. Jahrhundert. Verlag für Geschichte und Politik: 195–269.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Richard C. (2006) “Footprint metaphor and metabolic realities: Environmental impacts of medieval European cities,” in Paolo, Squatriti (ed.) Natures Past: The Environment and Human History. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Horváth, Gergely Krisztián (2011) “Rahmen des Bäuerlichen Handels im Wieselburger Komitat (Ungarn) in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Modell der Kommerzialisierung einer West-Ungarischen Region,” in Frank Konersmann and Klaus-Joachim Lorenzen-Schmidt (eds.) Bauern Als Händler. Ökonomische Diversifizierung und Soziale Differenzierung Bäuerlicher Agrarproduzenten (15.-19. Jahrhundert). Lucius & Lucius: 163–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Erik S., Peoples, Mark B., and Henrik, Hauggaard-Nielsen (2010) “Faba bean in cropping systems.” Field Crops Research 115(3): 203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Finn Vanman, Jensen, Erik Steen, and Schjoerring, Jan K. (1999) “Dinitrogen fixation in white clover grown in pure stand and mixture with ryegrass estimated by the immobilized 15N isotope dilution method.” Plant and Soil 208(2): 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapfer, Alois (2010) “Mittelalterlich-frühneuzeitliche Beweidung der Wiesen Mitteleuropas.” Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 42(6): 180–87.Google Scholar
Kopsidis, Michael (2006) Agrarentwicklung: Historische Agrarrevolutionen und Entwicklungsökonomie. Grundzüge der Modernen Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 6. Steiner.Google Scholar
Langthaler, Ernst (2004) “Gerahmte Landbilder. Agrargeschichtsschreibung in Österreich in der zweiten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts,” in Ernst Bruckmüller, Ernst Langthaler, and Josef Redl (eds.) Agrargeschichte Schreiben. Traditionen und Innovationen im Internationalen Vergleich. Studienverlag: 30–62.Google Scholar
Netting, Robert McC. (1993) Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
NÖLA (Niederösterreichisches Landesarchiv)(1786) Landesfürstliche und Staatliche Verwaltung, Staatliche Steuerverwaltung, Josephinische Fassion, Fassions Buch: Bruck an der Leitha.Google Scholar
NÖLA (Niederösterreichisches Landesarchiv) (1830) Landesfürstliche und Staatliche Verwaltung, Staatliche Steuerverwaltung, Franziszeischer Kataster: Urmappen, Operate and Protokolle: Bruck an der Leitha.Google Scholar
OeStA (Austrian State Archives) (1746–1848) Allgemeines Verwaltungsarchiv, Nachlässe, Familienarchiv Harrach, Wirtschaftsarchiv Österreich.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor (2015) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, Mark (1985) “The diffusion of agricultural innovations in early modern England: Turnips and clover in Norfolk and Suffolk, 1580–1740.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10(2): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, Mark (1996) Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy, 1500–1850. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, Ioannis, and Danso, Seth K. A. (1991) “Nitrogen fixation and transfer in vetch and vetch-oats mixtures.” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23(5): 447–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickl, Othmar (1973) “Routen, Umfang und Organisation des innereuropäischen Handels mit Schlachtvieh im 16. Jahrhundert,” in Alexander Novotny and Othmar Pickl (eds.) Festschrift Hermann Wiesflecker zum Sechzigsten Geburtstag. Historisches Institut Universität Graz: 143–66.Google Scholar
Raptis, Konstantinos (2017) Die Grafen Harrach und ihre Welt 1884–1945. Böhlau Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, S K. (2011) “Localized food systems: The way towards sustainable livelihoods and ecological security.” Journal of Animal and Plant Science 21(2): 388–95.Google Scholar
Sandgruber, Roman (1978a) Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistik Österreich-Ungarns. Vol 2, Österreichische Agrarstatistik, 1750–1918. Verlag für Geschichte und Politik.Google Scholar
Sandgruber, Roman (1978b) “Die Agrarrevolution in Österreich: Ertragssteigerung und Kommerzialisierung der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert,” in Alfred Hofmann (ed.) Sozial- und Wirtschaftshistorische Studien. Vol 10, Österreich-Ungarn als Agrarstaat. Wirtschaftliches Wachstum und Agrarverhältnisse in Österreich im 19. Jahrhundert. Verlag für Geschichte und Politik: 195–269.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mindi, and Philip, McMichael (2010) “Deepening, and repairing, the metabolic rift.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 37(3): 461–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiel, Robert S. (1991) “Improving soil productivity in the pre-fertiliser era,” in Bruce M. Campbell, S. and Mark, Overton (eds.) Land, Labour and Livestock: Historical Studies in European Agricultural Productivity. Manchester University Press: 51–77.Google Scholar
Sieferle, Rolf Peter (2006) Das Ende der Fläche: Zum Gesellschaftlichen Stoffwechsel der Industrialisierung. Böhlau.Google Scholar
Smit, Harm J., Metzger, Marc J., and Frank, Ewert (2008) “Spatial distribution of grassland productivity and land use in Europe.” Agricultural Systems 98(3): 208–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tello, Enric, Jover, Gabriel, Murray, Ivan, Fullana, Onofre, and Soto, Ricard (2018) “From feudal colonization to agrarian capitalism in Mallorca: Peasant endurance under the rise and fall of large estates (1229–1900).” Journal of Agrarian Change 18(3): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Michael, Beckett, John, and Afton, Bethanie (2003) “Agricultural sustainability and open-field farming in England, c. 1650–1830.” International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 1(2): 124–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. National Research Council (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Vinther, Finn P., and Hansen, Søren (2004) “SimDen: A simple model for quantification of N2O-emission and denitrification.” DJF rapport Markbrug nr. 104. Danmarks Jordbrugs Forskning, Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Økonomi.Google Scholar
Winiwarter, Verena (2003) “Agro-ecological history: Intrinsic resource problems of solar based societies,” in Brigitta, Benzing and Bernd, Herrmann (eds.) Exploitation and Overexploitation in Societies Past and Present. LIT Verlag: 81–100.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (2006) “The transition to an advanced organic economy: Half a millennium of English agriculture.” The Economic History Review 59(3): 435–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Sophie (1989) Biologische Stickstoffixierung und Stickstoffmineralisation in Böden Ostösterreichs. Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft Österreichs.Google Scholar