Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:19:05.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparability of the Public Use Files of the U.S. Census of Population, 1880–1980

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Steven Ruggles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most of the information released by the Census Bureau has always consisted of summary population counts cross-tabulated by individual or family characteristics. Although these data form the basic description of the American population, they are not ideal for analytical research. The Census Bureau cannot anticipate all the needs of social scientists, so many topics are inadequately covered in the published census volumes. For historical research, the problem is especially acute, because the published data are fairly sketchy for the period before 1940. Moreover, the classifications employed by the Census Bureau have changed over time, making long-term comparisons difficult or impossible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , Spring 1991 , pp. 123 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Margo J. (1988) The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Banister, Judith (1980) “Use and abuse of census editing and imputation.” Asian and Pacific Census Forum 6: 1–20.Google Scholar
Barrows, R. G. (1976) “Instructions to enumerators for completing the 1900 census population schedule.” Historical Methods 9: 201-12.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J. (1955) “The population of the United States in 1950 classified by age, sex, and color: A revision of the figures.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 50: 16–54.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Rives, N. W. (1973) “A statistical reconstruction of the black popu lation of the United States, 1880-1970: Estimates of true numbers by age and sex, birth rates, and total fertility.” Population Index 39: 3–36.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Zelnik, Melvin (1963) New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Conk, Margo A. (1980) The United States Census and Labor Force Change. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
Conk, Margo A. (1981) “Accuracy, efficiency, and bias: The interpretation of women’s work in the U.S. Census of Occupation, 1890-1940.” Historical Methods 14:65–72.Google Scholar
Department of Commerce and Labor (1910) Annual Reports for 1909. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Eckler, A. Ross (1972) The Bureau of.the Census. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fay, Robert E., Passel, Jeffrey S., Robinson, J. G., and Cowan, Charles D. (1988) 1980 Census of Population and Housing. Evaluation and Research Reports. The Coverage of Population in the 1980 Census.Google Scholar
Graham, Stephen N. (1979) 1900 Public Use Sample: User’s Handbook. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for Demography and Ecology.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. J. (1956) “Trends in the participation of women in the working force.” Monthly Labor Review 79: 559-65.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Robert (1987) Procedural History of the 1940 Census of Population and Housing. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kish, Leslie (1965) Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Land, Kenneth C. Hough, George C., and McMillan, Marilyn M. (1984) “New midyear age-sex-color specific estimates of the U. S. population for the 1940s and 1950s: Including a revision of coverage estimates for the 1940 and 1950 censuses.” Demography 21: 623-45.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter (1972) “Introduction,” in Laslett, Peter and Wall, Richard (eds.) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–65.Google Scholar
Openheimer, Valerie K. (1970) The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing Its Growth and Changing Composition. Population Monograph No. 5. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Price, Daniel O. (1947) “A check on underenumeration in the 1940 census.” American Sociological Review 12: 44–49.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven (1988) “The demography of the unrelated individual, 1900-1950.” Demography 25: 521-36.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, and Menard, Russell R. (forthcoming) “A public use sample of the 1880 Census of Population.” Historical Methods.Google Scholar
Sharpless, John B., and Shortridge, Ray M. (1975) “Biased underenumeration in census manuscripts: Methodological implications.” Journal of Urban History 1:409-39.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jacob S. (1968) “Completeness of coverage of the nonwhite population,” in Heer, David M. (ed.) Social Statistics and the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT and Harvard University, Joint Center for Urban Studies: 13–54.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jacob S. (1974) “Estimates of the coverage of the population by age, sex, and race in the 1970 census.” Demography 11: 1–23.Google Scholar
Stevens, David (forthcoming) “Life-course transitions to adulthood, 1900-1970.” Journal of Family History.Google Scholar
Strong, Michael A., Preston, Samuel H., Miller, Ann R., Hereward, Mark, Lentzner, Harold R., Seaman, Jeffrey R., and Williams, Henry C. (1989) User’s Guide: Public Use Sample, 1910 Census of Population. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Population Studies Center.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1910) Thirteenth Census of the United States: Instructions to Enumerators. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1916) Special Reports of the Twelfth Census. Supplementary Analysis and Derivative Tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1943) Sixteenth Census of the United States. Population. Compara tive Occupation Statistics for the United States, 1870 to 1940, by Edwards, Alba M.. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1955) The 1950 Censuses: How They Were Taken. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1966) The 1960 Censuses of Population and Housing: Procedural History. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1968) Changes between the 1950 and 1960 Occupation and Industry Classifications, by Priebe, John A.. Technical Paper 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1972a) Public Use Samples of Basic Records from the 1970 Census: Description and Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1972b) 1970 Occupation and Industry Classifications in Terms of Their 1960 Occupation and Industry Elements, by Priebe, John A., Heinkel, Joan, and Greene, Stanley. Technical Paper 26. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1973) Technical Documentation for the 1960 Public Use Sample. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1976) U.S. Census of Population and Housing: 1970 Procedural History. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1979) Twenty Censuses—Population and Housing Questions: 1790-1980. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1982a) Public Use Samples of Basic Records from the 1980 Census: De scription and Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1982b) “Coverage of the national population in the 1980 census by age, sex, and race: Preliminary estimates by demographic analysis.” Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 115. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1984a) Census of Population, 1940: Public Use Sample Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1984b) Census of Population, 1950: Public Use Sample Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1986) Census of Population and Housing (1980): History, 1980 Cen sus of Population and Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1989) “The relationship between the 1970 and 1980 industry and occu pation classification systems.” Technical Paper No. 59. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1882) Report of the Superintendent of the Census (November 1,1881). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1883) Tenth Census of the United States: 1880. Statistics of Population. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1895) Eleventh Census of the United States: 1890. Population, pt. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Walker, Francis A. (1888) “The eleventh census of the United States.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 2: 136-61.Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll, and Hunt, William C. (1900) The History and Growth of the United States Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar