Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:46:02.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment on Tilly: Women’s History, Social History, and Deconstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Extract

Louise Tilly’s thoughtful and provocative essay “Gender, Women’s History, and Social History” makes a genuine contribution to our thinking about the research that has been done in women’s history by proposing new categories for analysis and by addressing the current debate over the usefulness of deconstruction as a methodological tool for historians. She demonstrates that we have been engaged in “the study of women in time,” with some success. We have studied women’s occupations, sexuality, personal relationships, marriage choices, family roles, and education. We have examined changes in women’s legal and political rights, their engagement in social and political causes, their successes and failures in the political arena. We have analyzed the ways in which states have tried to regulate women’s behavior, the social and economic constraints under which women have functioned, and the intersection of patriarchy and capitalism. And we know infinitely more than we did two decades ago about these subjects.

Type
Comment and Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, Judith M. (1988) “‘History that stands still’: Women’s work in the European past.” Feminist Studies 14: 269283.Google Scholar
New York Times (1988).Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (1988) Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar