Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:27:11.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Access to Saloons, Wet Voter Turnout, and Statewide Prohibition Referenda, 1907–1919

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Michael Lewis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When explaining the success of the Prohibition movement in the United States between 1900 and 1920, scholars argue that prohibitionists were able both to tap into the distrust of many rural, native-born, evangelical Protestants toward modern urban life and to bring together disparate groups of reformers around one goal: the elimination of the saloon. Furthermore, localized campaigns resulting in the elimination of saloons from many rural areas kept this base of voters energized, ultimately leading to impressive dry turnouts in statewide Prohibition referenda. This study extends and amplifies these findings through an analysis of three sets of factors on voting outcomes: the percentage of various demographic groups (urban, immigrant, and ritualistic religious populations) residing in a county; the distance of each county to saloons; the presence or absence of producers of alcohol in a county. Results of ordinary least-squares regression demonstrate that access to saloons and the percentage of immigrant and ritualistic church members in a county are the variables that most influence the results of Prohibition referenda. Furthermore, unlike what previous research has demonstrated, these variables have their greatest influence by affecting wet turnout rates.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Fall 2008 , pp. 373 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anti-Saloon League (1912) American Issue, April 4. Westerville, OH: American Issue Publishing House.Google Scholar
Anti-Saloon League (1914) Proceedings, Fifteenth National Convention of the Anti-Saloon League of America. Westerville, OH: American Issue Publishing House: 35–36.Google Scholar
Bader, Robert S. (1986) Prohibition in Kansas. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Baker, Paula (1991) The Moral Frameworks of Public Life: Gender, Politics, and the State in Rural New York, 1870–1930. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blocker, Jack S. (1976) Retreat from Reform: The Prohibition Movement in the United States, 1890–1913. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Bordin, Ruth (1981) Women and Temperance: The Quest for Power and Liberty, 1873–1900. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Buenker, John D. (1973) “An American Kulturkampf: The birth pangs of cultural pluralism” in Buenker, John D. (ed.) Urban Liberalism and Progressive Reform. New York: Scribner: 163–97.Google Scholar
Burns, Eric (2004) The Spirits of America: A Social History of Alcohol. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Cashman, Sean Dennis (1981) Prohibition: The Lie of the Land. New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cherrington, Ernest H. (1920) The Evolution of Prohibition in the United States of America. Westerville, OH: American Issue Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Norman H. (1965) “‘The hell-soaked institution’ and the Washington Prohibition Initiative of 1914.” Pacific Northwest Quarterly 56: 1–16.Google Scholar
Clark, Norman H. (1976) Deliver Us from Evil: An Interpretation of American Prohibition. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Clark, Norman H. (1988) The Dry Years: Prohibition and Social Change in Washington. Rev. ed. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Eisenach, Eldon J. (1994) The Lost Promise of Progressivism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Larry D. (1979) Intemperance: The Lost War against Liquor. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eubanks, John E. (1950) Ben Tillman's Baby: The Dispensary System of South Carolina, 1892–1915. Augusta, GA: n.p. Google Scholar
Franklin, Jimmie Lewis (1971) Born Sober: Prohibition in Oklahoma, 1907–1959. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Manfred, and Bull, Donald (1976) The Register of United States Breweries, 1876–1976. Trumbull, CT: Holly.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Glenda (1996) Gender and Jim Crow: Women and the Politics of White Supremacy in North Carolina, 1896–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gladden, Washington (1886) Applied Christianity: Moral Aspects of Social Questions. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Grantham, Dewey W. (1983) Southern Progressivism: The Reconciliation of Progress and Tradition. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. (1963) Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. (1967) “Moral passage: The symbolic process in public designations of deviance.” Social Problems 15: 175–88.Google Scholar
Hamm, Richard (1995) Shaping the Eighteenth Amendment: Temperance Reform, Legal Culture, and the Polity, 1880–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Samuel P. (1980) American Political History as Social Analysis. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Frederick M., and Kinard, Harriet H. (1980) “Prohibition in South Carolina, 1880–1940: An overview.” Proceedings of the South Carolina Historical Association 41: 118–32.Google Scholar
Hohner, Robert A. (1969) “The prohibitionists: Who were they?” South Atlantic Quarterly 68: 491–505.Google Scholar
Isaac, Paul E. (1965) Prohibition and Politics: Turbulent Decades in Tennessee, 1885–1920. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Ivy, James D. (2003) No Saloon in the Valley: The Southern Strategy of Texas Prohibitionists in the 1880s. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Richard J. (1983) Grass Roots Politics: Parties, Issues, and Voters, 1854–1983. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Kelley, Robert (1977) “Ideology and political culture from Jefferson to Nixon.” American Historical Review 82: 531–62.Google Scholar
Kerr, K. Austin (1985) Organized for Prohibition: A New History of the Anti-Saloon League. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander (2000) The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul (1970) The Cross of Culture: A Social Analysis of Midwestern Politics, 1850–1900. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul (1979) The Third Electoral System, 1853–1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kouser, Morgan J. (1974) The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restrictions and the One-Party South. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindley, Laura (1927) Statewide Referenda in the United States on the Liquor Question. Westerville, OH: American Issue Press.Google Scholar
McGerr, Michael E. (1986) The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865–1928. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKelway, Alexander (1907) “State Prohibition in Georgia and the South.” Outlook 86: 946–59.Google Scholar
North Carolina Anti-Saloon League (n.d.) “Appeal from Salisbury”: Recent Utterances on State Prohibition Compiled by the North Carolina Anti-Saloon League. N.p.Google Scholar
North Carolina Women's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) (1888) Convention Minutes of the Women's Christian Temperance Union of North Carolina, Held in Raleigh, 1888. Greensboro, NC: Reece.Google Scholar
Odegard, Peter H. (1928) Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti-Saloon League. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrander, Gilman M. (1957) The Prohibition Movement in California, 1848–1933. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Panunzio, Constantine (1973) “The foreign-born's reaction to Prohibition,” in Austin Kerr, K. (ed.) The Politics of Moral Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley: 120–24.Google Scholar
Peagram, Thomas R. (1997) “Temperance politics and regional political culture: The Anti-Saloon League in Maryland and the South, 1907–1915.” Journal of Southern History 63: 57–90.Google Scholar
Perman, Michael (2001) Struggle for Mastery: Disfranchisement in the South, 1888–1908. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Howard N. (1980) Race Relations in the Urban South, 1865–1890. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Thomas G. (1982) “Supporters and opponents of Prohibition: Iowa in 1917.” Annals of Iowa 46: 510–22.Google Scholar
Sechrist, Robert (1983) The Prohibition Movement in the United States, 1801–1920 [data source]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Sellers, James B. (1943) The Prohibition Movement in Alabama, 1702–1943. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sims, Anastasia (1987) “The sword of the spirit: The WCTU and moral reform in North Carolina, 1883–1933.” North Carolina Historical Review 64: 394–415.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. (1903) “Anti-Saloon League holds meeting.” Raleigh News and Observer, July 9.Google Scholar
Sponholtz, Lloyd (1973) “The initiative and referendum: Direct democracy in perspective, 1898–1920.” American Studies 14: 43–64.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Ann-Marie E. (2003a) “Beyond parochialism: Southern progressivism, Prohibition, and state-building.” Journal of Southern History 69: 107–36.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Ann-Marie E. (2003b) Pathways to Prohibition: Radicals, Moderates, and Social Movement Outcomes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, James H. (1963) Prohibition and the Progressive Movement, 1900–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1912a) Thirteenth Census of the United States. Vol. 3, Population, 1910. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1912b) Thirteenth Census of the United States. Vols. 6–7, Agriculture: Reports by States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1919) Religious Bodies, 1916. Pt. 1, Summary and General Tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Warner, Sam B. (1931) Survey of Criminal Statistics in the United States for the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Ira M. (1989) “Prohibition and ethnocultural conflict: The Missouri Prohibition referendum of 1918.” Social Science Quarterly 70: 886–901.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Ira M. (1993) “Status politics and economic class interests: The 1918 Prohibition referendum in California.” Sociological Quarterly 31: 475–84.Google Scholar
Whitener, Daniel J. (1945) Prohibition in North Carolina, 1715–1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar