Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:08:12.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What's Left of Leftism?

Neoliberal Politics in Western Party Systems, 1945–2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Abstract

A novel brand of laissez-faire that lay outside the political mainstream in the early postwar years was broadly hailed at the dawn of the twenty-first century as the common sense of a global age. Yet how to understand neoliberalism as a specifically political thing, especially in the unlikely terrains of Western European and leftist politics, is unclear. This article mobilizes field theory to conceptualize and investigate neoliberal politics in Western democracies, treating the left-right axis as a variable but fundamental organizing dichotomy over which mainstream political parties exert a unique definitional influence. To trace how this dichotomy has shifted over time, I develop a novel index of political neoliberalism using data on the electoral programs of mainstream parties across 22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries between 1945 and 2004. I find that between the 1970s and 2004 a revised political center emerged, featuring a new concept of state responsibility and the means by which it should govern: a historical shift that took root across the left-right spectrum among mainstream parties and that was as much in evidence in Continental, Nordic, and southern countries as in Anglo-liberal countries. The overall trend can be fairly characterized as the rise of a specifically neoliberal politics. I suggest that a full explanation requires both a political sociology and a sociology of knowledge, attending to the organizational and cultural bases of Western party systems.

Type
Special Section: Chronologies and Complexities of Western Neoliberalism
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto (1987) “Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (3): 651–78.Google Scholar
Alesina, AlbertoMirrlees, JamesNeumann, Manfred J. M. (1989) “Politics and business cycles in industrial democracies.” Economic Policy 4 (8): 5598.Google Scholar
Alesina, AlbertoSummers, Lawrence H. (1993) “Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: Some comparative evidence.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 25 (2): 151–62.Google Scholar
Alt, James E. (1985) “Political parties, world demand, and unemployment: Domestic and international sources of economic activity.” American Political Science Review 79 (4): 1016–40.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. MichaelGarrett, GeoffreyLange, Peter (1991) “Government partisanship, labor organization, and macroeconomic performance.” American Political Science Review 85 (2): 539–56.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry (1976a) “The antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.” New Left Review (100): 578.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry (1976b) Considerations on Western Marxism. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry (2000) “Renewals.” New Left Review (1): 524.Google Scholar
Andersson, Jenny (2006) Between Growth and Security: Swedish Social Democracy from a Strong Society to a Third Way. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, Jenny (2007) “Socializing capital, capitalizing the social: Contemporary social democracy and the knowledge economy.” Center for European Studies Working Paper Series (145): 121.Google Scholar
Apeldoorn, Bastiaan vanOverbeek, HenkRyner, Magnus (2003) “Theories of European integration: A critique,” in Cafruny, Alan W.Ryner, J. Magnus (eds.) A Ruined Fortress? Neo-liberal Hegemony and Transformation in Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield: 1746.Google Scholar
Babb, Sarah (2001) Managing Mexico: Economics from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Babb, Sarah (2005) “The social consequences of structural adjustment: Recent evidence and current debates.” Annual Review of Sociology 31: 199222.Google Scholar
Baer, Kenneth (2000) Reinventing Democrats: The Politics of Liberalism from Reagan to Clinton. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur S.Day, Alan J.Muller, Thomas C. (1997) Political Handbook of the World 1997. Binghamton: Binghamton University and State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (2000 [1968]) The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, with “The Resumption of History in the New Century.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri (2006) The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Tony (1998) The Third Way: New Politics for a New Century. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
Blair, TonySchroeder, Gerhard (1999) “The third way: Die Neue Mitte.” London: Labour Party and SPD.Google Scholar
Block, Fred (1990) Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blundell, Richard (2007 [2001]) Waging the War of Ideas. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto (1996) Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles (1997) “Political parties and the supply side of the economy: The provision of physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–90.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 814–45.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles (2000) “Partisan governments, the international economy, and macroeconomic policies in advanced nations, 1960–93.” World Politics 53 (1): 3873.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, GiulianoPowell, Martin, eds. (2004) Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1988 [1984]) Homo Academicus, trans. Collier, Peter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990a) In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, trans. Adamson, Matthew. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990b [1982]) Language and Symbolic Power, ed. Thompson, John. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991 [1968]) Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1996 [1989]) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, trans. Clough, Lauretta C.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998) Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2008 [2002]) Political Interventions: Social Science and Political Action. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre et al. . (1999) The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, PierreWacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, PierreWacquant, Loïc J. D. (1999) “On the cunning of imperialist reason.” Theory, Culture, and Society 16 (1): 4158.Google Scholar
Bradley, DavidEvelyne Huber, Stephanie MollerNielsen, FrançoisStephens, John D. (2003) “Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies.” World Politics 55 (2): 193228.Google Scholar
Brady, DavidBeckfield, JasonSeeleib-Kaiser, Martin (2005) “Economic globalization and the welfare state in affluent democracies, 1975–2001.” American Sociological Review 70 (6): 921–48.Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil (2004) “Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000.” Review of International Political Economy 11 (3): 447–88.Google Scholar
Brenner, NeilTheodore, Nik (2002) “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’” Antipode 34 (3): 349–79.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy (2003) “Neoliberalism and the end of liberal democracy.” Theory and Event 7 (1): 123.Google Scholar
Budge, IanHans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea VolkensBara, JudithTanenbaum, Eric (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Peter (2001) “New Labour and the politics of depoliticisation.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (2): 127–49.Google Scholar
Cafruny, Alan W.Ryner, Magnus, eds. (2003) A Ruined Fortress? Neo-liberal Hegemony and Transformation in Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Callinicos, Alex (2001) Against the Third Way. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Camp, R. A. (1995) Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Camp, R. A. (2002) Mexico’s Mandarins: Crafting a Power Elite for the Twenty-First Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Centeno, M. A.Silva, P., eds. (1998) The Politics of Expertise in Latin America. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Cockett, Richard (1995 [1994]) Thinking the Unthinkable: Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Crosland, C. Anthony R. (1956) The Future of Socialism. London: Camelot.Google Scholar
Cuperus, RenéKandel, Johannes (1998) Social Democratic Think Tanks Explore the Magical Return of Social Democracy in a Liberal Era. Amsterdam: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung/Wiardi Beckman Stichting.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., ed. (1966) Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J.Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. (2002) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Allen F. (1964) “The Social workers and the Progressive Party, 1912–1916.” American Historical Review 69 (3): 671–88.Google Scholar
Dezalay, YvesGarth, Bryant (1998) “Sociology of the hegemony of neoliberalism.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 121: 322.Google Scholar
Dezalay, YvesGarth, Bryant (2002) The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, YvesGarth, Bryant (2008) “National usages for a ‘global’ science: The dissemination of new economic paradigms as a hegemonic global strategy and a national strategy for the reproduction of governing elites,” in Mallard, GrégoireParadeise, CatherinePeerbaye, Ashveen (eds.) Global Science and National Sovereignty: Studies in Historical Sociology of Science. London: Routledge: 143–67.Google Scholar
Dobbin, FrankSimmons, Beth, and Garrett, Geoffrey (2007) “The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?Annual Review of Sociology 33: 449–72.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., ed. (1997) Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Driver, StevenMartell, Luke (1998) New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eley, Geoff (2002) Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1994) “Welfare states and the economy,” in Smelser, Neil J.Swedberg, Richard (eds.) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation: 711–32.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1997) “After the golden age? Welfare state dilemmas in a global economy,” in Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (ed.) Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage: 132.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1999) The Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, ed. (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter (2005) “Counterhegemonic globalization: Transnational social movements in the contemporary global economy,” in Janoski, ThomasAlford, Robert R.Hicks, Alexander M.Schwartz, Mildred A. (eds.) The Handbook of Political Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 655–70.Google Scholar
Favretto, Ilaria (2003) The Long Search for a Third Way: The British Labour Party and the Italian Left since 1945. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Alan (2003) Making Sense of New Labour. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. (2002) “Parties and partisanship: A forty-year retrospective political behavior.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 93115.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil (1996) “Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions.” American Sociological Review 61 (4): 656–73.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil (2001) “Social skill and the theory of fields.” Sociological Theory 19 (2): 105–25.Google Scholar
Fligstein, NeilSweet, Alec Stone (2002) “Constructing polities and markets: An institutionalist account of European integration.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (5): 1206–43.Google Scholar
Flora, PeterHeidenheimer, Arnold, eds. (1984) The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion (2006) “The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (1): 145–94.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion (2009) Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fourcade, MarionHealy, Kieran (2007) “Moral views of market society.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 285311.Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, MarionBabb, Sarah (2002) “The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (3): 533–79.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael (1999a) “The ideology of New Labour.” Political Quarterly 70 (1): 4251.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael (1999b) Liberal Languages: Ideological Imaginaries and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedan, JeffreyRogowski, Ronald (1996) “The impact of the international economy on national policies,” in Keohane, Robert O.Milner, Helen V. (eds.) Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2547.Google Scholar
Friedman, M.Friedman, D. R. (1980) Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Fukayama, Francis (2006 [1992]) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey (2001) “Globalization and government spending around the world.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (4): 329.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1994) Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1998) The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1999) The Director’s Lectures: Politics after Socialism. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (2000) The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, ed. (2001) The Global Third Way Debate. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Glyn, Andrew (2001) Social Democracy in Neoliberal Times: The Left and Economic Policy since 1980. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Hoare, QuintinSmith, Geoffrey Nowell. New York: International.Google Scholar
Hale, Jon F. (1995) “The making of the New Democrats.” Political Science Quarterly 110 (2): 207–32.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. (2002) “The comparative political economy of the ‘third way,’” in Schmidtke, Oliver (ed.) The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy: Normative Claims and Policy Initiatives in the Twenty-First Century. Hampshire: Ashgate: 3158.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., ed. (1989) The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart (1998) “The great moving nowhere show.” Marxism Today, November–December, 9–14.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, IanChristie, Ian, eds. (1998) Tomorrow’s Politics: The Third Way and Beyond. London: Demos.Google Scholar
Hartman, Yvonne (2005) “In bed with the enemy: Some ideas on the connections between neoliberalism and the welfare state.” Current Sociology 53 (1): 5773.Google Scholar
Harvey, David (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, James P. (1980) “Antonio Gramsci’s Marxism: Class, state, and work.” Social Problems 27 (5): 584600.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin (1998) The Political Economy of New Labour. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. (2005 [1945]) The Road to Serfdom, with “The Intellectuals and Socialism.” London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. (2007 [1944]) The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents; The Definitive Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heffernan, Richard (2000) New Labour and Thatcherism: Political Change in Britain. Basingstoke: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Henisz, Witold J.Zelner, Bennet A.Guillén, Mauro F. (2005) “The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999.” American Sociological Review 70 (6): 871–97.Google Scholar
Hermele, Kenneth (1993) “The end of the middle road: What happened to the Swedish model?Monthly Review 44 (10): 1425.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. (2001) “Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 619–31.Google Scholar
Hira, Anil (1998) Ideas and Economic Policy in Latin America: Regional, National, and Organizational Perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Hira, Anil (2007) “Should economists rule the world?International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique 28 (3): 325–60.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon (1999) “Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (1): 69106.Google Scholar
Huber, EvelyneStephens, John D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Johnson, CarolTonkiss, Fran (2002) “The third influence: The Blair government and Australian Labor.” Policy and Politics 30 (1): 518.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S.Mair, Peter (2009) “The cartel party thesis: A restatement.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (4): 753–66.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto (1966) “The transformation of the Western European party systems,” in LaPalombara, JosephWeiner, Myron (eds.) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 177200.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-DieterAndrea Volkens, Judith BaraBudge, IanMcDonald, Michael, eds. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, Oskar (2000) The Heart Beats on the Left. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, JosephWeiner, Myron (1990 [1966]) “The origin of political parties,” in Mair, Peter (ed.) The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2530.Google Scholar
Lemke, ChristianeMarks, Gary, eds. (1992) The Crisis of Socialism in Europe. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, JaneSurender, Rebecca (2004) Welfare State Change: Towards a Third Way? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Cheng (2001) China’s Leaders: The New Generation. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1960) Political Man. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour MartinRokkan, Stein (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter (2004 [1997]) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter, ed. (1990) The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markoff, JohnMontecinos, Verónica (1993) “The ubiquitous rise of economists.” Journal of Public Policy 13 (1): 3768.Google Scholar
Marquand, David (2004) Decline of the Public: The Hollowing Out of Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Martin, Isaac (2008) The Permanent Tax Revolt: How the Property Tax Transformed American Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, John Levi (2003) “What is field theory?American Journal of Sociology 109 (1): 149.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S.Sanchez, R. MagalyBehrman, Jere R. (2006) “Of myths and markets.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 606 (1): 831.Google Scholar
Medvetz, Thomas Matthew (2007) “Think tanks and the production of policy knowledge in America.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Merkel, WolfgangAlexander Petring, Christian HenkesEgle, Christoph, eds. (2008) Social Democracy in Power: The Capacity to Reform. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert (1962) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, trans. Paul, EdenPaul, Cedar. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Miliband, David, ed. (1994) Reinventing the Left. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Montecinos, Verónica (1998) Economists, Politics, and the State: Chile, 1958–1994. Amsterdam: Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie Lee (2008) “What is neoliberalism?Socioeconomic Review 6 (4): 703–31.Google Scholar
Newman, Ottode Zoysa, Richard (2001) The Promise of the Third Way: Globalization and Social Justice. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie (2002) “Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare.” Economic Geography 78 (3): 331–60.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul (1996) “The new politics of the welfare state.” World Politics 48 (2): 143–79.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas (1992) The Limits of Social Democracy: Investment in Politics in Sweden. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas (1994) “Sweden: After the golden age,” in Anderson, PerryCamiller, Patrick (eds.) Mapping the West European Left. London: Verso: 2354.Google Scholar
Prasad, Monica (2006) The Politics of Free Markets: The Rise of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Dennis P.Toyoda, A. Maria (2007) “Ideology and voter preferences as determinants of financial globalization.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 344–63.Google Scholar
Reich, Robert B. (1999) “We are all third wayers now.” American Prospect, March 1, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=4538 (accessed June 24, 2008).Google Scholar
Rodgers, D. T. (1998) Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, NikolasMiller, Peter (1992) “Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government.” British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173205.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, DietrichSkocpol, Theda (1996) States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ryner, J. Magnus (2002) Capitalist Restructuring, Globalisation, and the Third Way: Lessons from the Swedish Model. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1968) “The sociology of parties: A critical review,” in Stammer, Otto(ed.) Party Systems, Party Organisations, and the Politics of the Masses. Berlin: Institut für Politische Wissenschaft an der Freien Universität: 125.Google Scholar
Sassoon, Donald (1996) One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. London: Tauris.Google Scholar
Sassoon, Donald, ed. (1997) Looking Left: European Socialism after the Cold War. London: Tauris.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Christopher (2001) “A step to the left? Or just a jump to the right? Making sense of the third way on government and governance.” Australian Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 481–98.Google Scholar
Schmidtke, Oliver, ed. (2002) The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy: Normative Claims and Policy Initiatives in the Twenty-First Century. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A.Dobbin, FrankGarrett, Geoffrey (2006) “Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism.” International Organization 60 (4): 781810.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R.Block, Fred (2005) “From poverty to perversity: Ideas, markets, and institutions over two hundred years of debate.” American Sociological Review 70 (2): 260–87.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven (1988) “Social democracy vs. socialism: Goal adaptation in social democratic Sweden.” Politics and Society 16 (4): 403–46.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven (1989) Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002) Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R. (2004) “The political economy of imprisonment in affluent Western democracies, 1960–1990.” American Sociological Review 69 (2): 170–89.Google Scholar
Teles, StevenKenney, Daniel A. (2008) “Spreading the word: The diffusion of American conservatism in Europe and beyond,” in Kopstein, JeffreySteinmo, Sven (eds.) Growing Apart? America and Europe in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 135–69.Google Scholar
Valdés, Juan G. (1995) Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Visser, JelleHemerijck, Anton (1997) A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform, and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. (1996) Freer Markets, More Rules. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea (2001) “Quantifying the election programmes,” in Budge, IanKlingemann, Hans-DieterVolkens, AndreaBara, Judith, and Tanenbaum, Eric (eds.) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 93110.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc (2006) “Pierre Bourdieu,” in Stones, Rob (ed.) Key Contemporary Thinkers. London: Macmillan: 215–29.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc (2008) “Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh.” Punishment and Society 3 (1): 95134.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc (2009) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Waxman, Chaim I., ed. (1968) The End of Ideology Debate. New York: Funk and Wagnall.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. Gerth, H. H.Mills, C. Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce (2007) Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar