Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:17:15.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Tale of Two Lines: “The Transylvanian” and “The Imperial”: Mapping Territorial Integration through Railway Architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2021

Cristina Purcar Open the ORCID record for Cristina Purcar [Opens in a new window]
Cristina Purcar*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While states undertook railway construction targeting economic and military objectives, this article questions whether and to which extent their symbolic territorial cohesion was also at stake. The hypothesis we aim to verify is that railway buildings acted as recurrent visual signifiers of territorial coherence and had, therefore, the potential of being instrumental as state-building tools. This research explores how an architectural reading of railway networks can inform our understanding of state-building projects and processes. We expect that geographically scoped railway architectural history is capable of cross-fertilizing political and planning history, through a better understanding of empire, state, and regional building discourses. The investigation focuses on the stylistic architectural choices of edifices on two trunk lines in Transylvania, North-West Romania, before World War I, while this territory belonged to the Habsburg then, as of 1867, Austro-Hungarian Empire. The large-scale analysis of railway architecture is discussed in relation to railway-line ownership, political (central, regional, and local) agency, economic development, and architectural Zeitgeist, highlighting state-building and territorial integration patterns. The mapping carried out reveals two successive architectural layers. These denote a shift in the role of railway architecture from an initial liberal phase, before the 1880s, to a bloom phase, prior to World War I. While during the former there was little state control over architectural aspects, during the latter architecture became a foremost representation instrument for the state railway administration. At the same time, the extant railway architecture appears as a palimpsest, a genuinely cross-border, European heritage, documenting the dynamics between imperial, state, regional, and local agencies.

Keywords

Nineteenth-century architectureTerritorial integrationTransylvaniaState-buildingRailway station stylistic choices
Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 45 , Special Issue 2: From State-Building to European Integration: The Role of the Railway Network in the Territorial Integration of Europe, 1850–2020 , Summer 2021 , pp. 317 - 339
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archival Sources

Additional-Uebereinkommen zur Concessions-Urkunde vom 18. August 1866…, Vienna, February 17, 1867. Austrian State Archives, War Archive, no. 9708/983/1867@227.Google Scholar
Concessions-Urkunde für die Locomotiv-Eisenbahn von Arad nach Carlsburg mit der Zweigbahn von Piski nach Petrozseny im Zsilthale, Vienna, August 18, 1866. Austrian State Archives, War Archive, no. 9708/983/1867@227.Google Scholar
Gesuch um Bewilligung der Staats-Garantie für die Piski-Zsilthaler Eisenbahn, printed in Vienna in 1864. The application is signed by the prince Max Egon Fürstenberg, the prince Emil Fürstenberg, the count Otto Chotek and Louis von Haber. Austrian State Archives, War Archive, no. 2561/1866.Google Scholar
Statuten der Actiengesellschaft der k.k. priv. Ersten Siebenbürger-Eisenbahn, Vienna, April 3, 1867. Austrian State Archives, War Archive, no. 9708/983/1867@227.Google Scholar

References

Bellu, Radu (2003) “130 de ani de la intrarea primului tren în Braşov 1873-1 iunie - 2003. Gările oraşului.” Ţara Bârsei (2): 55–60.Google Scholar
Boner, Charles (1865) Transylvania: Its Products and Its People. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (2004) “How institutions create ideas: Notions of public and private efficiency from early French and American railroading.” L'Année de la Régulation: 815–50.Google Scholar
Horváth, Ferenc, and Mihaly, Kubinszky (1998) “Magyar Vasúti Építkezések Erdélyben.” Vasúthistória Könyvek. Budapest: Magyar államvasutak rt.Google Scholar
Joyce, Patrick, and Chandra, Mukerji (2017) “The state of things: State history and theory reconfigured.” Theory and Society 46 (1): 1–19.10.1007/s11186-017-9282-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubinszky, Mihaly (1986) Bahnhöfe in Österreich. Architektur und Geschichte. Vienna: Slezak.Google Scholar
Kubinszky, Mihaly (2000) “Architectural feature of the Hungarian railways,” in Kovács, L. (ed.) The History of the Hungarian Railways, 1846–2000. Budapest: Hungarian State Railways Co. Ltd.: 181–201.Google Scholar
Mureşanu, Hilde (1974) “Proiecte privind construirea primelor căi ferate în Transilvania.” Anuarul Institutului de Istorie şi Arheologie Cluj (17): 268–79.Google Scholar
Perner, Julius (1898) “Hochbau,” in Strach, H. (ed.) Geschichte der Eisenbahnen der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchi. Vol 12. Vienna: Karl Prochaska: 113–23.Google Scholar
Purcar, Cristina (2009a) “Between the pastoral and the industrial: Territorial change along the First Transylvanian Railway branch line (1870–1948).” Centropa IX (2): 81–96.Google Scholar
Purcar, Cristina (2009b) “Railway and Landscape Interaction: A history of the First Transylvanian Railway 1868–2000." PhD diss., Associatie K.U.Leuven.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel (1934) Remembrance of Things Past, trans. Scott Moncrieff, C. K.. 2 vols. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Retegan, Ştefan (1974) “Dieta de la Sibiu 1863-1864.” PhD diss. Institutul de Istorie şi Arheologie Cluj-Napoca.Google Scholar
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang (1986) The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century. Leamington Spa: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Strach, Hermann, ed. (1898) Geschichte der Eisenbahnen der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie. 12 vols. Vienna: Karl Prochaska.Google Scholar
Tóth-Gáspár, Margareta (1964) “Condiţiile de muncă şi de viaţă ale minerilor din Valea Jiului şi luptele lor greviste până la sfârşitul sec. XIX.” Acta Musei Napocensis (I): 255–85.Google Scholar
Turnock, David (1999) “Railways and economic development in Romania before 1918.” Leicester University Discussion Papers in Geography Series: No. G99/1. Leicester: University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Vajda, Ludovic (1964) “Începuturile dezvoltării mineritului de cărbuni în Transilvania.” Acta Musei Napocensis (I): 397–419.Google Scholar
Vajda, Ludovic (1971) “Prima cale ferată din Transilvania.” Acta Musei Napocensis (VIII): 287–98.Google Scholar
Zádor, Anna (1985) Revival Architecture in Hungary. Classicism and Romanticism. Budapest: Helikon.Google Scholar