Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:18:19.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supreme Court Voting and Realigning Issues: A Microlevel Analysis of Supreme Court Policy Making and Electoral Realignment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

John B. Gates
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Realignment of the American party system is a major focus for students of voting behavior, congressional policy making, and political history (Key, 1955; Burnham, 1970; Clubb, Flannigan, and Zingale, 1980; Kleppner, 1979; Sundquist, 1973; Campbell, 1977; Trilling and Campbell, 1980; Ladd and Hadley, 1978; Brady and Stewart, 1982; Brady, 1985; Sinclair, 1982). The transformation of the party system encompasses significant shifts in electoral support for the major political parties, changes in congressional policy making, and a redirection of national policy making. The rise of new party eras is intriguing because the constitutional structure seeks to minimize such major institutional and policy change. The separation of powers, federalism, and different recruitment patterns for political leaders are structural factors inhibiting major policy change (Brady, 1985). Realignment overcomes these barriers as highly volatile and cross-cutting issues arise. These issues produce linkages between electoral choice, congressional voting, and the broad shape of national policy making.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , Fall 1989 , pp. 255 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamany, David (1973) “Legitimacy, realigning elections, and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review 3: 790–846.Google Scholar
Adamany, David (1980) “The Supreme Court’s role in critical elections,” in Campbell, B. and Trilling, R. (eds.) Realignment in American Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press: 229–259.Google Scholar
Barker, Lucius (1967) “Third parties in litigation.” Journal of Politics 24: 41–69.Google Scholar
Barnum, David (1985) “The Supreme Court and public opinion: Judicial decision making in the post-New Deal period.” Journal of Politics 47: 652–666.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (1988) “Measuring policy change in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82: 905–912.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence, Goldman, Sheldon, and Sarat, Austin (1982) “The evolution of litigation in the federal courts of appeals, 1895-1975.” Law and Society Review 16: 291–310.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen (1976) “Critical elections and the Supreme Court: Putting the cart after the horse” [communication]. American Political Science Review 70: 930–932.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr., and Wilken, Paul H. (1978) Intergroup Processes: A Micro-Macro Perspective. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blaustein, Albert P., and Mersky, Roy M. (1978) The First One Hundred Justices: Statistical Studies on the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Bolner, James, Feldman, Arnold, and Gates, John (1982) “A new method of bloc analysis of judicial voting.” Political Methodology 7: 109–130.Google Scholar
Brady, David (1978) “Critical elections, congressional parties and clusters of policy changes.” British Journal of Political Science 18: 79–100.Google Scholar
Brady, David (1985) “A reevaluation of realignments in American politics: Evidence from the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 79: 28–49.Google Scholar
Brady, David, and Stewart, Joseph (1982) “Congressional party realignment and transformations of public policy in three realigning eras.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 333–360.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Campbell, Bruce (1977) “Change in the southern electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 37–64.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. and Ulmer, S. Sidney (1976) “The Supreme Court and critical elections: A dissent.” American Political Science Review 70: 1215–1218.Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin (1921) The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Casper, Jonathan (1976) “The Supreme Court and national policy making.” American Political Science Review 70: 50–63.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M., Flannigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy (1980) Partisan Realignment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M., Flannigan, William H. and Traugott, Santa A. (1977) “Partisan cleavage and cohesion in the House of Representatives, 1861-1974.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7:375–401.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1957) “Decision-making in a democracy: The Supreme Court as a national policymaker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–295.Google Scholar
Dolan, Paul (1964) “Dissent in the Taney court.” Dickinson Law Review 68: 281–297.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John A. (1974) Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947-1968. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Funston, Richard (1975) “The Supreme Court and critical elections.” American Political Science Review 69: 795–811.Google Scholar
Gates, John B. (1984) “The American Supreme Court and electoral realignment: A critical review.” Social Science History 8: 267–290.Google Scholar
Gates, John B. (1987) “Unconstitutional state policies, electoral realignment, and policymaking by the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 259–280.Google Scholar
Gates, John B. (forthcoming) The Supreme Court and Partisan Realignment: A Macro and Microlevel Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gates, John B., and Cohen, Jeffrey E. (1988) “Presidents, justices, and racial equality cases, 1954-1984.” Political Behavior 10: 22–36.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. (1978) “Judges’ role orientations, attitudes, and decisions: An interactive model.” American Political Science Review 72: 911–924.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. (1983) “From simplicity to complexity: The development of theory in the study of judicial behavior.” Political Behavior 5: 7–49.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. (1986) “The social science of judicial politics,” in Weisberg, H. F. (ed.) Political Science: The Science of Politics. New York: Agathon Press: 141–166.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin (1976) “Elections and public policy.” American Political Science Review 70: 41–49.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1975) “Voting behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals revisited.” American Political Science Review 69: 491–506.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1982) Constitutional Law and Supreme Court Policymaking. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon, and Lamb, Charles [eds.] (1986) Judicial Conflict and Consensus: Behavioral Studies of American Appellate Courts. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit L. (1987) “Dissent on the California Supreme Court, 1850-1920.” Social Science History 11: 63–83.Google Scholar
Halpern, Stephen C. (1984) Percentages of nonunanimous Supreme Court cases, 1837-1964. Raw data.Google Scholar
Halpern, Stephen C., and Vines, Kenneth V. (1977) “Institutional disunity, the judges’ bill and the role of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Western Political Quarterly 30: 471–483.Google Scholar
Handberg, Roger, and Hill, Harold (1980) “Court-curbing, court reversal, and judicial review: The Supreme Court versus Congress.” Law and Society Review 14: 309–322.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review (1946-64).Google Scholar
Howard, J. Woodford (1981) Courts of Appeal in the Federal Judicial System. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Harold M., and Wiecek, William M. (1982) Equal Justice under the Law. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Johnson, Charles A. (1987) “Content analytic techniques and judicial research.” American Politics Quarterly 15: 169–197.Google Scholar
Keller, Morton (1977) Affairs of State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1955) “A theory of critical elections.” Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.Google Scholar
King, Gary (1987) “Presidential appointments to the Supreme Court: Adding systematic explanation to probabilistic description.” American Politics Quarterly 15: 373–386.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul (1979) The Third Electoral System, 1853-1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorfif, Klaus (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James, and Stanga, John (1979) “Political participation and government responsiveness: The behavior of California superior courts.” American Political Science Review 73: 1090–1099.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carl Jr., and Hadley, Charles D. (1978) Transformations of the American Party System. 2d ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lasser, William (1983) “Crisis and the Supreme Court: Judicial politics in periods of critical realignment.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lasser, William (1985) “The Supreme Court in periods of critical realignment.” Journal of Politics 47: 1174–1187.Google Scholar
Library of Congress (1978) The Constitution of the United States: Analysis and Interpretation. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
McDonald, Stuart Elaine, and Rabinowitz, George (1987) “The dynamics of structural realignment.” American Political Science Review 81: 775–796.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V. (1983) “Private use of a public forum: A long-range view of the dispute processing role of courts.” American Political Science Review 77: 991–1010.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V. (1985) “Litigating scientific creationism, or ‘Scopes’ II, III, . . . .” Law and Policy 7: 375–394.Google Scholar
McMichael, Laurence G., and Trilling, Richard J. (1980) “The structure and meaning of critical realignment,” in Campbell, B. and Trilling, R. (eds.) Realignment in American Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press: 21–51.Google Scholar
Murphy, Paul L. (1972) The Constitution in Crisis Times, 1918-1969. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Nagel, Stuart (1965) “Political parties and judicial review in American history.” Journal of Public Law 4: 328–340.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Karen (1980) Women’s Organizations’ Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald (1967) “A classification of presidential elections.” Journal of Politics 29: 535.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., Behr, Roy L., and Lazarus, Edward H. (1984) Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scammon, Richard M., and Wattenberg, Benjamin J. (1970) The Real Majority. New York: Coward-McCann.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1975) The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Schmidhauser, John R. (1961) “Judicial behavior and the sectional crisis of 1837-1860.” Journal of Politics 23: 615–640.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. (1984) “Predicting Supreme Court cases probabilistically: The search and seizure cases, 1962-1981.” American Political Science Review 78: 891–900.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. (1986) “Supreme Court justices as human decision makers: An individual-level analysis of the search and seizure cases.” Journal of Politics 48: 938–955.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth (1979) “Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara (1982) Congressional Realignment, 1925-1978. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R. (1986) “Factors affecting variation in rates of dissent in the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” in Goldman, S. and Lamb, C. (eds.) Judicial Conflict and Consensus: Behavioral Studies of American Appellate Courts. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press: 117–138.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold, and Rhode, David (1976) Supreme Court Policymaking. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James (1973) Dynamics of the Party System. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Swindler, William F. (1969) Court and Constitution in the Twentieth Century: The Old Legality, 1889-1932. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Swisher, Carl Brent (1954) American Constitutional Development. 2d ed. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal (1981) “Personal attribute models of the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices: Liberalism in civil liberties and economic decisions, 1946-1979.” American Political Science Review 75: 355–367.Google Scholar
Trilling, Richard J., and Campbell, Bruce A. (1980) “Toward a theory of realignment,” in Campbell, B. and Trilling, R. (eds.) Realignment in American Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press: 3–20.Google Scholar
Twiss, Benjamin R. (1942) Lawyers and the Supreme Court: How Laissez-Faire Came to the Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ulmer, S. Sidney (1982) “Supreme Court appointments as a Poisson distribution.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 113–116.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto (1975) Knowledge and Politics. San Francisco: Free Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Reports (1837-1964).Google Scholar
Warren, Charles (1932) The Supreme Court in United States History. Vol. 2. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Westin, Alan (1953) “The Supreme Court, the populist movement, and the campaign of 1896.” Journal of Politics 15: 3–41.Google Scholar