Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:07:20.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress and Mobility Among Ohio Propertyholders, 1810-1825

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Lee Soltow
Lee Soltow*
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our knowledge of economic progress for early Ohioans is limited because it is so difficult to trace successfully given individuals from year to year, let alone from decade to decade. If we start with the names of a dozen men, we often lose the genealogical trail of half of them before the search has progressed more than a few years. That is why we should welcome any solid evidence of tracings for any large subset of Ohio’s population, as presented on its tax duplicate for given years. Such evidence can teach us a great deal about the number of propertyholders who remained in Ohio over a period of of time, how many moved on, how many died, and something about their material progress.

Over a period of many years, Dr. Gerald Petty of Columbus has recorded information on taxpayers in Ohio and has provided me with punched cards and computer tapes for all taxpayers on the Ohio tax duplicates for the years 1810 and 1825. These duplicates are township and county lists of the names of taxpayers, details of their properties, and their tax assessments. These data describe 4.3 million acres in 1810 and 14.7 million in 1825, a sizable leap in development for this frontier state; by the time of its first federal census of agriculture in 1850, Ohio had recorded 18.0 million acres. In the 15-year period between 1810 and 1825, the number of propertyholders grew from 14,098 to 51,506. The purpose of this article is to report how many from the original group could be found among the latter number, and to say something about material progress in those cases where names could be matched. This study provides some fundamental knowledge about the early economic development as well as the levels of wealth inequality in Ohio.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1983 , pp. 405 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American State Papers (1802) Class X, Miscellaneous, Vol. 1Google Scholar
Annals of Congress. Vol. 9, 5th Cong., 3rd Sess., Acts of July 4 and 14, Appendix 3757-3786.Google Scholar
Compendium of the Ninth Census (1870) Washington, DC: Superintendent of the Census: 688–690.Google Scholar
David, P. and Solar, P. (1977) “A bicentenary contribution to the history of the cost of living in America,” in Uselding, P. (ed.) Research in Economic History, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E. J. (1967) Selected Writings of Albert Gallatin. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. (1975) Ohio Land Grants. Columbus: Auditor of State.Google Scholar
Hibbard, B. (1965) A History of the Public Land Policies. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
The Laws of the Northwest Territory, 1788-1800.Google Scholar
National Archives and Record Service (1967) Register of Revolutionary War Land Warrants, Act of 1788, Military District of Ohio. Microcopy No. T-1008. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
National Archives and Record Service (1963) United States Direct Tax of 1798: Tax Lists for the State of Pennsylvania. Microcopy No. 372, with accompanying pamphlet. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pitkin, T. (1816) A Statistical View of the Commerce of the United States (1967). New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar
Prussing, E. (1927) The Estate of George Washington, Deceased. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1982a) “Male inheritance expectations in the United States in 1870.” Rev. of Economics and Statistics 64 (May).Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1982b) “Land speculation in West Virginia in the early federal period: Randolph County as a specific case.” Working paper, Department of Economics, Ohio University.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1982c) “The long-run trend in Pennsylvania land grants, 1663-1823.” Working paper, Department of Economics, Ohio University.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1979) “Land inequality amidst abundance: land ownership in early nineteenth century Ohio.” Ohio History 88 (Spring): 133–151.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1977) “America’s first progressive tax.” National Tax J. 30 (March): 53–58.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1975) Men and Wealth in the United States, 1850-1870. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1965) Toward Income Equality in Norway. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. and Keller, K. (1982) “Tenancy and asset-holding in late eighteenth century Washington County, Pennsylvania.” Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine (January).Google Scholar
Statutes at Large of Pennsylvania from 1682 to 1801 (1896-1915) Mitchell, and Flanders, H. (eds.) Vol. 14. Harrisburg: State Printer.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, N. (1958) “Land policy and speculation in Pennsylvania, 1779-1800.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
W. P. A. Plat Books of Ohio Counties in the Virginia Military District (n.d.) Manuscript in the office of State Auditor’s Office, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar