Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:27:17.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polling the Opinions

A Reexamination of Mountain, Plain, and Gironde in the National Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Benjamin Reilly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has long been agreement among scholars that the French National Convention can be usefully divided into three political categories, the Mountain, the Plain, and the Gironde, yet there has been much less agreement about the size and composition of these categories. In order to test existing categories of classification, especially those of Patrick (1969, 1972) and Lewis-Beck et al. (1988), this article examines a neglected body of data, the anti-inviolability opinions produced during King Louis XVI's trial, and uses them as an opinion poll with which to examine the political identity of a cross-section of deputies in the National Convention in the winter of 1792-93.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Spring 2004 , pp. 53 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertucat, M. N. (1792) “Opinion… sur le jugement de Louis XVI.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Camus, A. G. (1792) “Opinion… sur les principes de la conduite à tenir par la République Française à l'égard du ci-devant Roi et de sa famille.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Desmoulins, C. (1792) “Opinion… sur le jugement de Louis XVI.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Dulaure, J. A. (1792) “Opinion… sur le jugement du ci-devant Roi.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Genevois, L. B. (1792) “Le procès de Louis XVI, réduit à ses vrais termes.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Higonnet, P. (1998) Goodness beyond Virtue: Jacobins during the French Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kates, G. (1985) The Cercle Social, the Girondins, and the French Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuscinski, A. (1973) Dictionnaire des Conventionnels. Brueil-en-Vexin: Editions du Vexin Français.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.,Hildreth, A., and Spitzer, A. B. (1988) “Was there a Girondist faction in the National Convention, 1792-1793?” French Historical Studies 11: 519–36.Google Scholar
Louchet, L. (1792) “Opinion… sur le procès de Louis XVI.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Mellinet, F. (1792) “Discours… sur la question suivante: Louis XVI peut-il être jugé?” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Michet, A. (1792) “Observations sur le procès de Louis XVI.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Milhaud, J. B. (1792) “Opinion… sur le jugement de Louis Capet, dit Louis XVI.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Patrick, A. (1969) “Political divisions in the French National Convention, 1792-93.” Journal of Modern History 41:421–74.Google Scholar
Patrick, A. (1972) The Men of the First French Republic: Political Alignments in the National Convention of 1792. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Poultier, F. (1792) “Opinion… sur le procès du ci-devant Roi.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Quinette, N. M. (1792) “Projet de décret sur le jugement de Louis XVI.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Ricord, J. F. (1792) “Opinion…concernant le jugement de Louis XVI.” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Saint-André, J. B. (1792) “Opinion… sur cette question: Louis XVI peut-il être jugé?” Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Sydenham, M. J. (1961) The Girondins. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Sydenham, M. J. (1971) “The Montagnards and their opponents: Some considerations on a recent reassessment of the conflicts in the French National Convention, 1792-93.” Journal of Modern History 43:287–93.Google Scholar