Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:31:36.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Political Integration of British Women: The Response of a Traditional System to a Newly Emergent Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Jorgen S. Rasmussen*
Affiliation:
Iowa State University

Extract

Britain has been a model of political stability for so long that thinking of it as anything but that is difficult. The familiar image of Edwardian England is that of an Indian summer spent with a jovial uncle. This was a system, however, that was in crisis and was recognized by its contemporaries as being so. Regardless of whether the challenges of the Irish question, labor unrest, and suffragette militancy were connected or merely coincidential (see Pelling, 1968: 147-164), all three shared the common characteristic of extra-parliamentary activism and of violent—either actual or anticipated—methods. Furthermore, the system also was burdened with other contentious issues, as “politics after 1901 were increasingly dominated by controversies about matters which most Victorians had regarded as settled and closed to discussion” (Read, 1972: 16-17). If ever a governmental system suffered from an overload of simultaneous demands from a multiplicity of pressing and intractable problems, this was it. Contrary to what sometimes has been supposed, Britain’s political elite did not regard the approaching international hostilities as providing a means of alleviating these burdens by welding the country together with patriotic fervor. Instead they feared that war would be the final blow undermining the governments’s authority and, perhaps, producing civil war (French, 1982: 85-95).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank the Department of Political Science at Iowa State University for providing a research assistant to collect data for this study. My thanks also to the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to strengthen the article.

References

Butler, D. and Sloman, A. (1975) British Political Facts 1900-1975. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Craig, F.W.S. (1977) British Parliamentary Election Results 1918-1949. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Daily Express (1979): 1.Google Scholar
French, D. (1982) British Economic and Strategic Planning 1905-1915. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Githens, M. and Prestage, J. [eds.] (1977) A Portrait of Marginality. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Kinnear, M. (1968) The British Voter: An Atlas and Survey Since 1885. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Pelling, H. (1968) Popular Politics and Society in Late Victorian Britain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pugh, M. (1978) Electoral Reform in War and Peace, 1906-18. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. (1981) “Female political career patterns and leadership disabilities in Britain: the crucial role of gatekeepers in regulating entry to the political elite.Polity 13 (Summer): 600620.Google Scholar
Read, D. (1972) Edwardian England 1901-15: Society and Politics. London: Harrap.Google Scholar