Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:51:57.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Consequences of Spatial Organization

Contrasting Patterns in Two Nineteenth-Century Small Cities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Donald A. DeBats
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The unique feature of geographic information systems (GIS) and other forms of historical data visualization is the capacity to hold and display large amounts of data associated with spatial reference points. This software can display all data for a given point, a single variable for all points, or, most important, any combination of variables across all reference points. In doing so, these systems bring to the screen instantly and cheaply a display of information once visible only in paper form, drawn slowly and expensively, first by cartographers and then by vector plotters. This project deploys GIS to help us understand the intersection of social and political life in nineteenth-century Alexandria, Virginia, and Newport, Kentucky—medium-sized cities with populations under 20,000. Commercial Alexandria, with a race-based labor system, and industrial Newport, with an immigrant labor system, present an analytically useful mix of commonalities and differences.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 35 , Issue 4: Historical GIS and the Study of Urban History , Winter 2011 , pp. 505 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auyero, J. (2007) “Spaces and places as sites and objects of politics,” in Dalton, R. J.Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 564–78.Google Scholar
Batty, M. (2000) “The new urban geography of the third dimension.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27 (4): 483–84.Google Scholar
Bean, W. G. (1954) “John Letcher and the slavery issue in Virginia’s gubernatorial contest of 1858–1859.” Journal of Southern History 20 (1): 22–49.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. F.DeBats, D. A. (1977) “Identifiable voting in nineteenth-century America: Toward a comparison of Britain and the United States before the secret ballot.” Perspectives in American History 11: 259–88.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. F.DeBats, D. A. (1995) Washington County: Politics and Community in Antebellum America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. J. (2008) “Decentering urban history: Peripheral cities in the modern world.” Journal of Urban History 35 (1): 3–14.Google Scholar
DeBats, D. A. (2004) “German and Irish political engagement: The politics of cultural diversity in an industrial age,” in Helbich, W.Kamphoefner, W. D. (eds.) German-Irish Immigration and Ethnicity in Comparative Perspective. Madison: Max Kade Institute for German-American Studies, University of Wisconsin: 171–220.Google Scholar
DeBats, D. A. (2008a) “A tale of two cities: Using tax records to develop GIS files for mapping and understanding nineteenth-century U.S. cities.” Historical Methods 41 (1): 17–38.Google Scholar
DeBats, D. A. (2008b) “Who votes? Who voted? The 2008 American elections: Contexts for judging participation and partisanship.” Australasian Journal of American Studies 27 (1): 16–36.Google Scholar
DeBats, D. A. (2009) “Using GIS and individual-level data for whole communities: A path towards the reconciliation of political and social history.” Social Science Computer Review 27 (3): 313–30.Google Scholar
DeBats, D. A.Lethbridge, M. (2005) “GIS and the city: Nineteenth-century residential patterns.” Historical Geography 33: 78–98.Google Scholar
Doucet, M. (1982) “Speculation and the physical development of mid-nineteenth century Hamilton,” in Stelter, G.Artibis, A. (eds.) Shaping the Urban Landscape: Aspects of the Canadian City-Building Process. Ottawa, ON: Carlton University Press: 173–99.Google Scholar
Doucet, M.Weaver, J. (1991) Housing the North American City. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Garrioch, D.Peel, M. (2006) “Introduction: The social history of urban neighborhoods.” Journal of Urban History 32 (5): 663–76.Google Scholar
Gregory, I. N. (2003) A Place in History: A Guide to Using GIS in Historical Research. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Gutman, H. (1959) “An iron workers’ strike in the Ohio Valley, 1873–1874.” Ohio Historical Quarterly 68 (4): 353–70.Google Scholar
Hays, S. P. (1985) “Society and politics: Politics and society.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 15 (3): 481–99.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, W. S. (1981) “The limits of southern unionism: Virginia conservatives and the gubernatorial election of 1859.” Journal of Southern History 47 (1): 57–72.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. (2007) “Information, persuasion, and political communication networks,” in Dalton, R. J.Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 100–122.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R.Johnson, P. E.Sprague, J. (2005) “Individuals, dyads, and networks: Autoregressive patterns of political influence,” in Zuckerman, A. S. (ed.) The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 21–48.Google Scholar
Hurst, H. W. (1991) Alexandria on the Potomac: The Portrait of an Antebellum Community. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kalb, D. (2007) “Uses of local knowledge,” in Dalton, R. J.Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 579–94.Google Scholar
Key, V. O.Munger, F. (1959) “Social determinism and electoral decision: The case of Indiana,” in Burdick, E.Brodbeck, A. (eds.) American Electoral Behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press: 281–99.Google Scholar
Melvin, P. M. (1987) “The neighborhood-city relationship,” in Miller, Z.Gillette, H. (eds.) American Urbanism: A Historiographical Review. New York: Greenwood: 257–70.Google Scholar
Miller, Z. (1981) “The role and concept of neighborhood in American cities,” in Fisher, R.Romanofsky, P. (eds.) Community Organization for Urban Social Change: A Historical Perspective. Westport, CT: Greenwood: 3–31.Google Scholar
Omer, I.Benenson, I. (2002) “Investigating fine-scale residential segregation by means of local spatial statistics.” Geographical Research Forum 12: 41–60.Google Scholar
Purvis, T. L. (1996) Newport, Kentucky: A Bicentennial History. Newport, KY: Zimmerman.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1966) “Political attitudes and the local community.” American Political Science Review 60 (3): 640–54.Google Scholar
Scherzer, K. A. (2000) “Southern cities—how exceptional?” Journal of Urban History 26 (5): 692–706.Google Scholar
Schnore, L. F.Knights, P. R. (1969) “Residence and social structure: Boston in the antebellum period,” in Thernstrom, S.Sennett, R. (eds.) Nineteenth-Century Cities: Essays in the New Urban History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 247–56.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. (2002) “Small towns and nineteenth-century urbanization.” Journal of Urban History 28 (2): 220–30.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (1969) Democracy in America, ed. Mayer, J. P., trans. Lawrence, G.. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Warner, S. B. (1969) The Private City: Philadelphia in Three Periods of Its Growth. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Weber, A. F. (1899) The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century: A Study in Statistics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, A. S. (2005a) “Preface,” in Zuckerman, A. S. (ed.) The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: xv–xx.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, A. S. (2005b) “Returning to the social logic of political behavior,” in Zuckerman, A. S. (ed.) The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 3–20.Google Scholar