Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:35:25.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“New Political History”: Some Statistical Questions Answered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

J. Morgan Kousser  and
Allan J. Lichtman
J. Morgan Kousser
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Allan J. Lichtman
Affiliation:
The American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

William G. Shade’s (1981) “New Political History: Some Statistical Questions Raised” has two sometimes conflicting purposes: first, to remind historians to “think statistically” and to “give more self-conscious attention to the details and logic of research design,” and second, to defend such ethnocultural historians as Ronald P. Formisano and Paul Kleppner against published criticisms. Too often confusing the former with the latter aim, Shade attains neither. His article is further compromised by distortions of other scholars’ work and neglect of relevant literature published since 1974. With Shade’s two major prescriptions—plan research carefully and use genuinely multivariate methods—we have no quarrel. Often breached in practice, these familiar commandments can never be repeated too many times. To his lack of conceptual rigor, to his employment of a series of either meaningless or misleading “tests,” and to several of his methodological dicta, we do take exception—thus the necessity for this note.

Type
Comment and Debate
Information
Social Science History , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Summer 1983 , pp. 321 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We wish to thank David Grether for giving this a close reading, and Jim Graham for many helpful editorial suggestions. We accept responsibility for all remaining errors.

References

Alexander, T. B., Elmore, P., Lowery, F. and Skinner, M. (1966) “The basis of Alabama’s two-party system.” Alabama Rev. 19: 243–276.Google Scholar
Benson, L. (1961) The Concept of Jacksonian Democracy. New York as a Test Case. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, H. M. (1972) Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. and Ward, S. (1980) “Ratio variables in aggregate data analysis: their uses, problems, and alternatives,” pp. 60–79 in Borgatta, E. F. and Jackson, D. J. (eds.) Aggregate Data: Analysis and Interpretation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. F. and DeBats, D. A. (1980) “Individuals and aggregates: a note on historical data and assumptions.” Social Sci. History 4: 229–250.Google Scholar
Broder, I. and Lichtman, A. J. (1983) “Modeling the past: a note on the search for proper form.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 13: 489–502.Google Scholar
Dollar, C. M.and Jensen, R. J. (1971) Historian’s Guide to Statistics: Quantitative Analysis and Historical Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Formisano, R. P.(1971) The Birth of Mass Political Parties: Michigan, 1827-1861. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gold, D. (1969) “Statistical tests and substantive significance,” Amer. Sociologist 4: 42–46.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. (1981) “Family strategies and the family economy in the late 19th century: the role of secondary workers,” pp. 277–310 in Hershberg, T. (ed.) Philadelphia: Work, Space, Family, and Group Experience in the 19th Century. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. S. (1978) Analyzing Qualitative/ Categorical Data: Log-Linear Models and Latent Structure Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. S. (1959) “Some alternatives to ecological correlation.” Amer. J. of Sociology 64: 610–625.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. L. (1979a) “New approaches to aggregate electoral data.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 9: 473–492.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. L. (1979b) The Politics of Benevolence: Revival Religion and American Voting Behavior. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. L. (1973) “Two sources of error in ecological correlations.” Ameri. Soc. Rev. 38: 764–777.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A. and Jackson, J. E. (1977) Statistical Methods For Social Scientists. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A. and Kain, J. F. (1974) “Model specification, use of aggregate data, and the cological correlation fallacy.” Political Methodology 1: 89–107.Google Scholar
Irwin, G. A. (1967) “Two methods for estimating voter transition probabilities.” Ph. D. Dissertation, Florida State University.Google Scholar
Jones, E. T. (1972) “Ecological inference and electoral analysis.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 2: 249–262.Google Scholar
Knoke, D. and Burke, P. J. (1980) Log-Linear Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. M. (1980) “Making separate equal: integration of black and white school funds in Kentucky.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 10: 399–428.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. M. (1976) “The new political history: a methodological critique.” Reviews in Amer. History 4: 1–14.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. M. (1973) “Ecological regression and the analysis of past politics.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 4: 237–262.Google Scholar
Langbein, L. I. and Lichtman, A. J. (1978) Ecological Inference. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lichtman, A. J. (1974) “Correlation, regression, and the ecological fallacy: a critique.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 4: 417–433.Google Scholar
Lichtman, A. J. and Langbein, L. I. (1978) “Ecological regression versus homogeneous units: a specification analysis.” Social Sci. History 2: 172–194.Google Scholar
McCrary, P., Miller, C., and Baum, D. (1978) “Class and party in the secession crisis: voting behavior in the Deep South, 1856-1861” J. of Interdisciplinary History 8: 429–457.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. E. and Henkel, R. E. (1970) The Significance Test Controversy—A Reader. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. (1950) “Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 15: 351–357.Google Scholar
Shade, W. A. (1981) “‘New political history’: some statistical questions raised.” Social Sci. History 5 (Spring): 171–196.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. E. (1969) “Cross-level inference as a game against nature,” pp. 62–83 in Berns, J. (ed.) Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, M. A.(1980) “Problems and opportunities in the use of individual and aggregate level census data,” pp. 53–70 in Clubb, J. M. and Scheuch, E. K. (eds.) Historical Social Research: The Use of Historical and Process-Produced Data. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. (1983) “The estimation of voting behavior from aggregate data: a test.” J. of Social History 16: 35–53.Google Scholar
Winkle, K. J. (1983) “A social analysis of voter turnout in Ohio, 1850-1860.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 136: 411–436.Google Scholar