Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:20:06.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Migration of American Colonial Militiamen: A Comparative Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Daniel Scott Smith
Daniel Scott Smith*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From their recent analysis of the relationship between place of enlistment and place of birth of eighteenth-century American militiamen, Villaflor and Sokoloff (1982: 542-543; 559-560) concluded that “a high level of mobility stands out,” a finding that they note is now “a commonplace both in the discipline of American history and in studies of pre-industrial communities.” While these empirical studies have surely refuted the romantic belief in the permanence of all of the personnel of preindustrial localities, they have not demonstrated that mobility was uniformly “high” everywhere. Imprecision in comparing the rates of mobility in two places is inevitable without a comparable index of the extent of movement.

Villaflor and Sokoloff (1982) implicitly reject the notion of a “mobility transition,” a construct that associates higher rates of internal migration with more rapid rates of economic growth (Zelinsky, 1971), which Jones (1981) discerned in his comparison of the handful of studies of local population persistence in the colonial period with those for the nineteenth century. They realize, however, that a precise comparison of the place of enlistment with the birthplace of young men of an average age of 24 with the proportion of adult males who appear on two successive decennial censuses is not possible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1983 , pp. 475 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. W. and Kasakoff, A. B. (1980) “Migration at marriage in colonial New England: a comparison of rates derived from genealogies with rates from vital records,” pp. 115–138 in Dyke, B. and Morrill, W. T. (eds.) Genealogical Demography. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. (1977) “Changes in^the American propensity to migrate.” Annals of the Assn. of Amer. Geographers 77 (December): 577–587.Google Scholar
Jones, D. L. (1981) Village and Seaport: Migration and Society in Eighteenth-Century Massachusetts. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Long, L. H. (1970) “On measuring geographic mobility.” J. of the Amer. Statistical Assn. 65 (September): 1195–1203.Google Scholar
Long, L. H. and Boertlein, C. G. (1976) “The geographical mobility of Americans: an international comparison.” Current Population Reports, Special Studies Series P. 23, No. 64. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Parkerson, D. G. (1982) “How mobile were nineteenth-century Americans?” Historical Methods 15 (Summer): 99–109.Google Scholar
Smith, D. S. (1980) “A Malthusian-frontier interpretation of United States demographic history before c. 1815,”pp. 15–24 in Borah, W. et al. (eds.) Urbanization in the Americas: The Background in Historical Perspective. Ottawa, Canada: National Museum of Man.Google Scholar
Taeuber, K. E., Chiazze, L. Jr., and Haenszel, W. (1968) Migration in the United States: An Analysis of Residence Histories. Public Health Monograph No. 77. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Bicentennial edition. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1963) United States Census of Population: 1960. Subject Reports: Lifetime and Recent Migration. Final Report PC(2)-D. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1946) Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population: Internal Migration, 1935 to 1940. Age of Migrants, 1935 to 1940. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Villaflor, G. C. and Sokoloff, K. L. (1982) “Migration in colonial America: evidence from the militia muster rolls.” Social Sci. History 6 (Fall): 539–570.Google Scholar
Weber, A. F. (1967) The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century: A Study in Statistics (1899). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, W. (1971) “The hypothesis of the mobility transition.” Geographical Rev. 61 (April): 219–249.Google Scholar