Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:28:32.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: The Transformation of Petitioning in the Long Nineteenth Century (1780–1914)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Henry Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This introductory essay, firstly, offers a comparative, historical perspective on the transformation of petitioning into a vehicle for mass popular politics across North America and Western Europe during the “long” nineteenth century (1780–1914). While petitions were well established as an instrument of state in many early modern states, from the late eighteenth century a new type of mass, public, collective petitioning, based on established or invoked rights, emerged on an unprecedented scale in many countries. Mass petitioning underpinned the nascent repertoires of collective action pioneered by social movements. At the same time, the reception of petitions was institutionalized by political authorities, particularly legislatures elected under limited suffrage, as a potential source of legitimation. Secondly, the introduction suggests why people petitioned, and continued to petition, when their campaigns were often unsuccessful in achieving immediate results. The answer lies in the manifold advantages of petitioning in enabling political organization, mobilization, identity formation, citizenship, political change, and the forming of networks with elite political actors. By shaping an emerging field examining petitioning and petitions, raising awareness of petitions as sources and the methodologies to exploit them, and addressing broad questions of interest to historians and social scientists, this special issue hopes to stimulate further research and contribute to a rich dialogue in the years to come.

Type
introduction
Information
Social Science History , Volume 43 , Issue 3: The Transformation of Petitioning , Fall 2019 , pp. 409 - 429
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnés, Benoît (2011) “Le ‘Pétitionnaire Universel’: Les Normes de la Pétition en France et au Royaume-Uni Pendant la Première Moitié du XIXe Siècle.” Revue d’Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine (54): 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnés, Benoît (2013) “A Chartist Singularity? Mobilizing to Promote Democratic Petitions in Britain and France, 1838–1848.” Labour History Review (78s): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. A. (2003) Re-writing the French Revolutionary Tradition: Liberal Opposition and the Fall of the Bourbon Monarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almbjär, Martin (2016) “The Voice of the People? Supplications submitted to the Swedish Diet in the Age of Liberty, 1719–1772.” PhD diss., Umeå University.Google Scholar
Almbjär, Martin (2019) “The Problem with Early-Modern Petitions: Safety Valve or Powder Keg?” European Review of History (forthcoming; online early view).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, Sonia, Keane, John, and Merkel, Wolfgang, eds. (2011) The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avril, Emmanuelle, and Neem, Johann, eds. (2015) Democracy, Participation and Contestation: Civil Society, Governance and the Future of Liberal Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ben-Bassat, Yuval (2013) Petitioning the Sultan: Protests and Justice in Late Ottoman Palestine. London: I. B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy, and Nord, Philip, eds. (2000) Civil Society Before Democracy: Lessons from Nineteenth-Century Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bochel, Catherine (2013) “Petitions Systems: Contributing to Representative Democracy?” Parliamentary Affairs (66): 798–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Karin, and Munck, Thomas, eds. (2018) Early Modern Political Petitioning and Public Engagement in Scotland, Britain and Scandinavia, c. 1550–1795. Parliaments, Estates and Representation 38 (3): 271–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel (2016) “Recruitment by Petition: American Antislavery, French Protestantism, English suppression.” Perspectives on Politics (14): 700–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, and Brossard, Doris (2019) “L’éruption Patriote: French Canada at the Epicenter of the Nineteenth-Century Petitioning Explosion.” Social Science History 43 (3): 453–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, and Moore, Colin D. (2014) “When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women.” American Political Science Review (108): 479–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, and Schneer, Benjamin (2015) “Party Formation through Petitions: The Whigs and the Bank War of 1832–1834.” Studies in American Political Development (29): 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, Popp, Zachary, Resch, Tobias, and Schneer, Benjamin (2018) “Suffrage Petitioning as Formative Practice: American Women Presage and Prepare for the Vote, 1840–1940.” Studies in American Political Development (32): 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Malcolm (2019) “What Did Chartism Petition For?” Social Science History 43 (3): 531–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowans, Jon (2001) To Speak for the People: Public Opinion and the Problem of Legitimacy in the French Revolution. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De, Rohit, and Travers, Robert (2019) “Petitioning and Political Cultures in South Asia: Introduction.” Modern Asian Studies 53 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Costa, Ravi (2006) “Identity, Authority, and the Moral Worlds of Indigenous Petitions.” Comparative Studies in Society and History (48): 669–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Gwilym (2014) “Kingship, Parliament and the Court: The Emergence of ‘High Style’ in Petitions to the English Crown, c. 1350–1405.” English Historical Review (129): 515–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, W. F. (1890) Modern Constitutions. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drescher, Seymour (1986) Capitalism and Antislavery: British Mobilization in Comparative Perspective. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Will, ed. (2012) Malcontents, Rebels and Pronunciados: The Politics of Insurrection in Nineteenth-Century Mexico. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Will (2016) Independent Mexico: The Pronunciamiento in the Age of Santa Anna, 1821–1858. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleadle, Kathryn (2009) Borderline Citizens: Women, Gender and Political Culture, 1815–1867. Oxford: British Academy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (February 7, 1839) 3rd series, vol. 45: col. 167.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Stefan-Ludwig (2003) “Democracy and Associations in the Nineteenth Century: Toward a Transnational Perspective.” Journal of Modern History (75): 269–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, R. A. (2014) Peasant Petitions: Social Relations and Economic Life on Landed Estates, 1600–1850. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huzzey, Richard (2019) “The Micropolitics of Abolitionism: Anti-Slavery, Petitioning and Prosopography in Plymouth.” Social Science History 43 (3): 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huzzey, Richard, and Miller, Henry (forthcoming) “Petitions, Parliament and Political Culture: Petitioning the House of Commons, 1780–1918.” Past & Present.Google Scholar
Innes, Joanna (2006) “Legislation and Public Participation, 1760–1830,” in Lemmings, D. (ed.) The British and Their Laws in the Eighteenth Century. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell: 102–32.Google Scholar
Innes, Joanna, and Philp, Mark, eds. (2013) Re-imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland, 1750–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, James A. (2019) “The Languages of Petitioning in Early Colonial India.” Social Science History 43 (3): 581–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janse, Maartje (2019) “‘What Value Can We Attach to All These Petitions?’ Petition Campaigns and the Problem of Legitimacy in the Nineteenth-Century Netherlands.” Social Science History 43 (3): 509–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupp, Peter (1998) British Politics on the Eve of Reform: The Duke of Wellington’s Administration, 1828–1830. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, Mark (2018) “‘The Lowest Degree of Freedom’: The Right to Petition, 1640–1800,” in Huzzey, Richard (ed.) Pressure and Parliament: From Civil War to Civil Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell: 18–35.Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, Ronald J. (2012) Reclaiming the Petition Clause: Seditious Libel, “Offensive” Protest, and the Right to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Langewiesche, Dieter (2001) “Revolution in Germany: Constitutional State, Nation State, Social Reform,” in Dowe, Deiter, Haupt, H-G., Langewiesche, Deiter, and Sperber, Jonathan (eds.) Europe in 1848: Revolution and Reform. New York: Berghahn: 120–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Michael (2012) A Laboratory of Liberty: The Transformation of Political Culture in Republican Switzerland, 1750–1848. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipp, Carola, and Krempel, Lothar (2001) “Petitions and the Social Context of Political Mobilization in the Revolution of 1848/49: A Microhistorical Actor-Centred Network Analysis.” International Review of Social History 46, Supplement 9: Petitions in Social History: 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Henry C. (1890) Constitutional History of France. Chicago: Rand, McNally and Co.Google Scholar
Loft, Philip (2016) “Involving the Public: Parliament, Petitioning and the Language of Interest, 1688–1720.” Journal of British Studies (55): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makovi, Kinga (2019) “The Signatures of Social Structure: Petitioning for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in Manchester.” Social Science History 43 (3): 625–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. (1996) “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Framing Processes– Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements,” in McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, Maggie (2016) “Lobbying and the Petition Clause.” Stanford Law Review (68): 1131–1205.Google Scholar
McKinley, Maggie (2018) “Petitioning and the Making of the Administrative State.” Yale Law Journal (127): 1538–1635.Google Scholar
Miller, Henry (2012) “Popular Petitioning and the Corn Laws, 1833–46”: English Historical Review (127): 882–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Henry (2017) “Petition! Petition!! Petition!!! Petitioning and the Organization of Public Opinion in Britain, c. 1800–1850,” in Janse, Maartje and te, Henk Velde (eds.) Organizing Democracy: Reflections on the Rise of Political Organizations in the Nineteenth Century. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Henry (forthcoming) “The British Women’s Suffrage Movement and the Practice of Petitioning, 1890–1914.” Historical Journal.Google Scholar
Morgan, Edmund S. (1988) Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Muller, Hannah Weiss (2016) “From Requête to Petition: Petitioning the Monarch Between Empires.” Historical Journal 60: 659–86.Google Scholar
Murphy, Ann B., and Raftery, Deirdre, eds. (2004) Emily Davies: Collected Letters, 1861–1875. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Oddens, Joris (2017) “The Greatest Right of Them All: The Debate on the Right to Petition in the Netherlands from the Dutch Republic to the Kingdom (c. 1750–1830).” European History Quarterly (47): 634–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios Cerezales, Diego (2011) “Embodying Public Opinion: From Petitions to Mass Meetings in Nineteenth-Century Portugal.” e-Journal of Portuguese History (9): 1–19.Google Scholar
Palacios Cerezales, Diego (2019) “Re-imagining Petitioning in Spain (1808–23).” Social Science History 43 (3): 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parssinen, T. M. (1973) “Association, Convention and Anti-Parliament in British Radical Politics, 1771–1848.” English Historical Review (88): 504–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paz, Denis (1992) Popular Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Victorian England. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacey, Jason (2013) Print and Public Politics in the English Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Paul (2001) “‘And Your Petitioners, &c.’: Chartist Petitioning in Popular Politics, 1838–1848.” English Historical Review (116): 368–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Robert (2019) “Petitioners and Rebels: The Lancashire Petitions for Parliamentary Reform, 1816–17.” Social Science History 43 (3): 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinders, Michel (2011) “‘The Citizens Come from All Cities with Petitions’: Printed Petitions and Civic Propaganda in the Seventeenth Century,” in Deen, Femke, Reinders, Michel, and Onnekink, David (eds.) Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Republic. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riehm, Ulrich, Böhle, K., and Lindner, R. (2013) Electronic Petitioning and Modernization of Petitioning Systems in Europe. Berlin: Office of Technology Assessment, German Bundestag.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre (2007) The Demands of Liberty: Civil Society in France since the Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Lord John (1823) An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution, 2nd ed. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Select Committee on Public Petitions (1833) Reports. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Sperber, Jonathan (1991) Rhineland Radicals: The Democratic Movement and the Revolution of 1848–1849. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Jonathan (1994) The European Revolutions, 1848–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
te Velde, Henk, and Janse, Maartje (2017) “Introduction: Perspectives on Political Organizing,” in te, Henk Velde, Maartje Janse (eds.) Organizing Democracy: Reflections on the Rise of Political Organizations in the Nineteenth Century. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Velde, Henk (1995) Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2008) Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, Lex Heerma van (2001) “Introduction.” International Review of Social History 46, Supplement 9: Petitions in Social History: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettengel, M. (2001) “Party Formation in Germany: Political Associations in the Revolution of 1848,” in Dowe, Deiter, Haupt, H-G., Langewiesche, D., and Sperber, Jonathan (eds.) Europe in 1848: Revolution and Reform. New York: Berghahn: 529–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, Amanda Jane (2015) Women and Petitioning in the Seventeenth-Century English Revolution. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilton, Carol (2000) Popular Politics and Political Culture in Upper Canada, 1800–1850. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirls, Daniel (2007) “‘The Only Mode of Avoiding Everlasting Debate’: The Overlooked Senate Gag Rule for Antislavery Petitions.” Journal of the Early Republic (27): 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Women’s Leader and Common Cause (January 20, 1910).Google Scholar
Wright, Herbert F., ed. (1919) Constitutions of the States at War, 1914–1918. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wright, Scott (2015) “Populism and Downing Street e-Petitions: Connective Actions, Hybridity and the Changing Nature of Organizing.” Political Communication (32): 414–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaeske, S. (2003) Signatures of Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery and Women’s Political Identity. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Caroline Press.Google Scholar
Zaret, David (2000) Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions and the Public Sphere in Early Modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaret, David (2019) “Petition-and-Response and Liminal Petitioning in Comparative/Historical Perspective.” Social Science History 43 (3): (this issue; page numbers TBA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar