Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:17:01.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactive, Direct-Entry Approaches to Event Files: British Contentious Gatherings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

R. A. Schweitzer
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Steven C. Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Michigan

Extract

As recently as a decade ago, an authoritative introduction to computing for historians recommended an approach which essentially employed the computer as a rigid, if very large, tabulator. Edward Shorter’s The Historian and the Computer (1971) described how to reduce complex information to simple fixed-choice codes, transfer the coded data to punched cards, read the cards into fixed-format package programs, and prepare large tabulations or statistical analyses from the data. Shorter’s advice made sense: it encouraged historians who knew little about computers or quantification to move ahead, and enabled them to produce useful results without becoming programmers. During the 1970s, however, three important changes in computing made the sturdy old procedures obsolete. The first change was the increasing availability of flexible, inexpensive microprocessors—small machines with memories as big as many large computers of the 1960s, which would operate by themselves or in conjunction with powerful central computers, which came with a great variety of prepared programs, and which would serve for the entry, transmission, storage, editing, manipulation, analysis, and presentation of many different sorts of information, including ordinary words. The second change was the improvement of interactive computing, in which a relatively inexperienced analyst could carry on a prompted “conversation” with a sophisticated machine while searching or analyzing a complex machinereadable file. The third was the development of data base management systems which, from the user’s point of view, greatly simplified the storage and manipulation of large bodies of machine-readable evidence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors are grateful to Tim Beckett, John Boyd, Laurie Burns, Keith Clarke, Phylis Floyd, Harry Grzelewski, Dave Hetrick (ILIR: MICRO), Chris Lord, Debbie McKesson, and the other GBS staff members who worked on this material. We also wish to thank Dr. Charles Tilly for his encouragement and assistance. We would like to especially thank Bill Golson, without whose work on design and writing of the data entry program, this article would not have been possible. The National Science Foundation supports the research herein described.

References

Schweitzer, R. A., Tilly, C., and Boyd, J. (1980) “The texture of contention in Britain, 1828–1829.” Ann Arbor: Center for Research on Social Organization. Working paper #211, April.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1971) The Historian and the Computer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. and Schweitzer, R. A (1980) “Enumerating and coding contentious gatherings in nineteenth-century Britain.” Ann Arbor: Center for Research on Social Organization. Working paper #210, February.Google Scholar
Tilly, L., Tilly, L. and Tilly, R. (1975) The Rebellious Century, 1830–1930. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar