Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:08:21.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Adversarial Politics of Fiscal Federalism: Tax Policy and the Conservative Ascendancy in Canada, 1988–2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2015

Aaron Major  and
Josh McCabe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When and how do tax regimes become sites of social protest and support broader movements of social policy reform? This question has drawn increasing interest from political sociologists and political scientists who have looked at the ways in which tax regimes create political cleavages that create the foundations for major shifts in state policy making or become the focal points of collective identity formation, leading to “tax protests.” In this paper we seek to contribute to this line of inquiry through an examination of the politics of Canadian tax policy from 1988 through 2008. What makes this case so compelling is that during these years the debates over tax policy raged over, first, the implementation and, later, the reduction of a federal value-added tax (VAT). However, rather than fueling a broad-based tax protest, debates over the VAT heightened interprovincial political cleavages that allowed the Conservatives to tie the question of the VAT to a broader economic program of typically “neoliberal” reforms: improving private-sector competitiveness and shrinking the size of the state. Drawing on a statistical analysis of the Canadian Election Study and an historical analysis of the conflict over taxation, we show how the federal structure of the Canadian state, and its policies of revenue equalization across the provinces, created an interprovincial adversarial politics that made sales tax reduction a key issue for Canadian voters. Our findings show how recognizing the historically contingent and institutionally specific context of struggles over tax policy helps to explain cross-national variation in the politics of taxation.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 38 , Issue 3-4 , Fall/Winter 2014 , pp. 333 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advisory Panel on Fiscal Imbalance (2006) Reconciling the Irreconcilable: Addressing Canada's Fiscal Imbalance. Ottawa: The Council of the Federation.Google Scholar
Amenta, E. (1998) Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, A., and Elman, C. (2006) “Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 455–76.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. (1980) The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brodie, I. (2009) “Does Evidence Matter in Policy-Making?” Speech presented at Public Policy in Crisis? Understanding Policy-Making in Canada, McGill Institute for the Study of Canada, Montreal, Canada, March 26.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (2001) “Fiscal equalization revisited.” Paper presented at the Montreal Economic Institute, Montreal, October 25.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L., and Morgan, K. J. (2005) “Federalism and the politics of old-age care in Germany and the United States.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (8): 887–914.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. M. (1999) “The fourth fiscal era: Can there be a ‘post-neo-conservative’ fiscal policy?” in Leslie A. Pal (ed.) How Ottawa Spends, 1999–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 113–50.Google Scholar
Canadian Tax Foundation (2002) Finances of the Nation, 2002. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Cernetig, M., and Laghi, B. (1996) “GST row hobbles Grits in west liberals were hoping for breakthrough, but 1993 promises have come back to haunt them.” The Globe and Mail, December 18, A4.Google Scholar
Chase, S. (2007) “What the Tory budget buys; 1 FAMILIES Parents with children under 18 get tax credit worth $310 per child 2 SENIORS Flaherty allows couples to split incomes on individual tax filings 3 THE BLOC Duceppe support ensures budget will pass through the Commons.” The Globe and Mail, March 20, A1.Google Scholar
Chetty, R., Looney, A., and Kroft, K. (2009) “Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence.” American Economic Review 99 (4): 1145–77.Google Scholar
Clarkson, S. (2001) “The liberal threepeat: The multi-system party in the multi-party system,” in Dornan, Christopher and Pammett, Jon H. (eds.) The Canadian General Election of 2000. Toronto: Dundurn Press: 13–59.Google Scholar
Clark, Campbell (2007) “GST cut won't trigger an election, Dion says; Canadians still in no mood for trip to polls, Liberal Leader believes, setting bar higher for defeating government.” The Globe and Mail, October 25, A4.Google Scholar
Clarke, H., Kornberg, A., Scotto, T., and Twyman, J. (2006) “Flawless Campaign, Fragile Victory: Voting in Canada's 2006 Federal Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (4): 815–19.Google Scholar
Conservative Party of Canada (2006) Stand Up for Canada: Conservative Party of Canada Federal Election Platform 2006. Ottawa: Conservative Party of Canada.Google Scholar
Eccleston, R. (2007) Taxing Reforms: The Politics of the Consumption Tax in Japan, the United States, Canada and Australia. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
El Akkad, O. (2005) “Harper's GST vow receives mixed reviews; Productivity won't improve: Analysts.” The Globe and Mail, December 2, B1.Google Scholar
Flanagan, T. (2009) Harper's Team. 2nd ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, G., and Clark, C. (2005) “Harper pledges GST cut.” The Globe and Mail, December 2, A1.Google Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2006) “Tax mixes and the size of the welfare state: Causal mechanisms and policy implications.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (4): 360–73.Google Scholar
George, A. L., and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Grant, T. (2007) “Plan to cut GST blasted.” The Globe and Mail, October 24, A2.Google Scholar
Greenspon, E. (1996) “Discord over GST on agenda for talks finance ministers not in harmony.” The Globe and Mail, June 17, A1.Google Scholar
Greenspon, E. (1998) “Provinces to ask for $6-billion finance ministers ask Ottawa to restore slashed health and social payments.” The Globe and Mail, June 15, A1.Google Scholar
Hale, G. (2002) The Politics of Taxation in Canada. Toronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, J., and Smith, J. (2001) Financing the Federation. Adelaide: The South Australian Centre for Economic Studies.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1948) Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hays, J. C. (2003) “Globalization and capital taxation in consensus and majoritarian democracies.” World Politics 56 (1): 79–113.Google Scholar
Ibbitson, J. (2005) “Brilliant ploy gives Tories an emphatic upper hand.” The Globe and Mail, December 2, A1.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (2006) Stephen Harper and the Future of Canada. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Kato, J. (2003) Regressive Taxation and the Welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kone, S. L., and Winters, R. F. (1993) “Taxes and voting: Electoral retribution in the American states.” The Journal of Politics 55 (1): 22–40.Google Scholar
Krelove, R., Stotsky, J. G., and Vehorn, C. L. (1997) “Chapter nine: Canada,” in Ter-Minassian, Teresa (ed.) Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund: 201–26.Google Scholar
Laghi, Brian (2004) “Harper offers a plum to Atlantic Canada.” The Globe and Mail, May 27, A1.Google Scholar
Landon, S., and Ryan, D. L. (1997) “The political costs of taxes and government spending.” The Canadian Journal of Economics 30 (1): 85–111.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, Daniel (2004) “Williams declares flag war over equalization payments; Newfoundland Premier angry at Ottawa over lack of deal on oil and gas revenues.” The Globe and Mail, December 24, A1.Google Scholar
Lecours, A., and Béland, D. (2010) “Federalism and fiscal policy: The politics of equalization in Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (4): 569–96.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. S. (2003) Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. (2004) Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Little, B. (1998) “Tax cut battles loom surpluses spark calls for reductions in UI premiums, personal and corporate taxes, GST.” The Globe and Mail, June 1, B1.Google Scholar
Lo, C. (1990) Small Property versus Big Government: Social Origins of the Property Tax Revolt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacManus, S. A. (1995) “Taxing and spending politics: A generational perspective.” The Journal of Politics 57 (3): 607–29.Google Scholar
Marchildon, G. P. (2005) “Understanding equalization: Is it possible?” Canadian Public Administration 48 (3): 420–28.Google Scholar
Martin, I. (2008) The Permanent Tax Revolt: How the Property Transformed American Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, I., and Gabay, N. (2007) “Do visible taxes cause protest? Tax institutions and tax protest in 13 OECD countries.” Unpublished working paper, U.C. San Diego Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
Martin, I., and Gabay, N. (2013) “Fiscal protest in thirteen welfare states.” Socio-economic Review 11 (1): 107–30.Google Scholar
Martin, I., Mehrotra, A. K., and Prasad, M. (2009) The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, L. (2005) “Harper should hit the Grits where it hurts—in the GST.” The Globe and Mail, September 8, A27.Google Scholar
Mayer, W. G. (1993) The Changing American Mind: How and Why American Public Opinion Changed between 1960 and 1988. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, S. (1998) “Chrétien rejects provinces' plea for money finance ministers ‘ask for something and offer nothing.’” The Globe and Mail, June 16, A1.Google Scholar
Murrell, D., and Yu, W. (2000) “The effect of the harmonized sales tax on consumer prices in Atlantic Canada.” Canadian Public Policy 26 (4): 451–60.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2009) Economic Policy Reforms 2009: Going for Growth. OECD Publishing: Paris.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2011) OECD Economic Outlook, Vol. 2011/2. OECD Publishing: Paris.Google Scholar
Paige, J. M. (1999) “Conjecture, comparison and conditional theory in macrosocial inquiry.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 781–800.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1995) “Fragmented welfare states: Federal institutions and the development of social policy.” Governance 8 (4): 449–78.Google Scholar
Pitlik, H., Schneider, Friedrich G., and Strotmann, H. (2006) “Legislative malapportionment and the politicization of Germany's intergovernmental transfer system.” Public Finance Review 34 (6): 637–62.Google Scholar
Prasad, M. (2006) The Politics of Free Markets: The Rise of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Britain, France, Germany, & the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prasad, M., and Deng, Y. (2009) “Taxation and the worlds of welfare.” Socio-economic Review 7 (3): 431–57.Google Scholar
Rhomberg, C. (2010) “A signal juncture: The Detroit newspaper strike and post-accord labor relations in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (6): 1853–94.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2002) “The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 670–87.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2003) “Reviving leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government.” International Organization 57 (4): 695–729.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2010) “Federalism and inter-regional redistribution,” in Bosch, Nuria, Espasa, Marta, and Sole Olle, Albert (eds.) The Political Economy of Inter-Regional Fiscal Flows. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing: 191–220.Google Scholar
Sallot, Jeff (2005) “Deal reached on offshore oil revenue; $2.6-billion to Newfoundland, $830-million to Nova Scotia pleases respective premiers.” The Globe and Mail, January 29, A7.Google Scholar
Sears, D. O., and Citrin, J. (1985) Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jeffrey (2004) “The right thing for the wrong reason.” The Globe and Mail, October 26, A21.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1986) “States and Social Policies.” Annual Review of Sociology 12: 131–57.Google Scholar
Sorens, J. (2011) “The institutions of fiscal federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41 (2): 207–31.Google Scholar
Spahn, P., and J. Werner (2007) “Germany at the junction between solidarity and subsidiary,” in Bird, Richard M. and Ebel, Robert D. (eds.) Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralized Countries. London: Edward Elgar: 89–113.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (1993) Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Taber, J. (2005) “GST plan called ‘magic bullet’; Ex-Liberal pollster pushed party in ‘96 to target the tax as campaign plank.” The Globe and Mail, December 2, A10.Google Scholar
Tutton, Michael (2001) “Atlantic ministers will urge Martin to boost transfer payments.” The Globe and Mail, February 26, A4.Google Scholar
Treff, K., and Ort, D. (2009) Finances of the Nation, 2009. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. (1995) “The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (2002) Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yakabuski, Konrad (2008) “Billions of dollars more - and he's still not happy.” The Globe and Mail, September 25, B2.Google Scholar