Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T01:09:59.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rise up and Work! Workless People with Impaired Health under Germany's New Activation Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2010

Martin Brussig  and
Matthias Knuth
Martin Brussig
Affiliation:
Institute for Work and Employment, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany E-mail: [email protected]
Matthias Knuth
Affiliation:
Institute for Work and Employment, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Unemployment Benefit II’ (Arbeitslosengeld II) is the newly created benefit in Germany for workless and needy people of working age who either lack or have exhausted entitlements in the contribution-based unemployment insurance system. This paper explores the effects of an ‘activating’ benefit regime on respondents with inferior health-related capacities by re-analysing data from a recent customer panel survey of this population of recipients. For one, the overall level of activation produced by the new system is differentiated with regard to the health status of the target population. Second, the effects of activation on two employment-related outcomes are estimated, taking health into account.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 311 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, S., Bozio, A., Emmerson, C., Greenberg, D. And Knight, G. (2008), ‘A cost–benefit analysis of Pathways to Work for new and repeat incapacity benefits claimants’, Research report 498, a report of research carried out by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, University of Maryland and Policy Studies Institute on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions, Department for Work and Pensions, available online at http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rports2007-2008/rrep498.pdf.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H. and Duggan, M. G. (2003), ‘The rise in the disability rolls and the decline in unemployment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 18, 157–205.Google Scholar
Barbier, Jean-Claude (2004), ‘Systems of social protection in Europe: two contrasted paths to activation, and maybe a third’, in Lind, Jens, Knudsen, Herman and Joergensen, Henning (eds.), Labour and Employment Regulation in Europe, Bruxelles: PIE Lang, pp. 233–54.Google Scholar
Beatty, Christina and Fothergill, Stephen (2005), ‘The diversion from “unemployed” to “sickness” across British regions and districts’, Regional Studies, 39, 837–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Uwe (2000), ‘Welfare state development and employment in the Netherlands in comparative perspective’, Journal of European Social Policy, 10, 219–39.Google Scholar
Bonvin, Jean-Michel and Rosenstein, Emilie (2008), ‘Activating unemployed and disabled people: teachings from the Swiss experience’, draft paper for the International Conference ‘Activation’ Policies on the Fringes of Society: A Challenge for European Welfare States, organised by the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) and the Political Sociology Section of the German Sociological Association, Nuremberg, 15–16 May 2008, available online at http://doku.iab.de/veranstaltungen/2008/activation_2008_bonvin_rosenstein.pdf.Google Scholar
BMAS (2008), ‘Endbericht zur Evaluation der Experimentierklausel nach § 6c SGB II, Vergleichende Evaluation des arbeitsmarktpolitischen Erfolgs der Modelle der Aufgabenwahrnehmung “zugelassener kommunaler Träger” und “Arbeitsgemeinschaft”’, Berlin.Google Scholar
Büttner, R., Knuth, M., Muth, J., Beer, D. and Schumann, D. (2001), ‘Begleitende Evaluierung der ESF-Interventionen im Rahmen des Operationellen Ziel-3-Programms der Phase 1994–1999 in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Abschlussbericht’, Institut Arbeit und Technik, Gelsenkirchen.Google Scholar
Büttner, R., Knuth, M., Neuffer, S., Neukirch, S., Schweer, O. and Stegmann, T. (2007), ‘Evaluation der ersten Phase des Bundesprogramms “Perspektive 50plus – Beschäftigungspakte für Ältere in den Regionen” (2005–2007)’, Endbericht, Gelsenkirchen.Google Scholar
Campolieti, M. (2004), ‘Disability insurance benefits and labor supply: some additional evidence’, Journal of Labor Economics, 22, 863–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carcillo, Stéphane and Grubb, David (2006), ‘From inactivity to work: the role of active labour market policies’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 36, OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
Casey, Bernard H. (2004), ‘Why are older people not more “active”’, Discussion paper PI, 0408, Pensions Institute, available online at http://www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp0408.pdf.Google Scholar
Clasen, J., Davidson, J., Ganßmann, H. and Mauer, A. (2006), ‘Non-employment and the welfare state: the UK and Germany compared’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 2, 134–54.Google Scholar
Dornette, J., Rauch, A., Schubert, M., Behrens, J., Höhne, A. and Zimmermann, M. (2008), ‘Auswirkungn der Einführung des Sozialgesetzbuches II auf erwerbsfähige hilfebedürftige Personen mit gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigungen’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 54, 1, 79–96.Google Scholar
Erlinghagen, Marcel and Knuth, Matthias (2008), ‘Why are Germans unemployed but other Europeans incapacitated: uncovering institutional myths of employment policy success’, Paper prepared for the IAB/DGS Conference, Activation Policies on the Fringes of Society, 15/16 May 2008, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Nürnberg, available online at http://doku.iab.de/veranstaltungen/2008/activation_2008_erlinghagen_knuth.pdf.Google Scholar
Finn, D., Knuth, M.Schweer, O. and Somerville, W. (2005), ‘Reinventing the public employment service: the changing role of employment assistance in Britain and Germany’, Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society, London, available online at http://www.agf.org.uk/pubs/pdfs/1404web.pdf.Google Scholar
Grubb, D. and Miyamoto, K. (2003), ‘Benefits and employment, friend or foe: interactions between passive and active social programmes’, in OECD (ed.), Employment Outlook: Towards More and Better Jobs, Paris: OECD, pp. 171–235.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. and Kubik, J. D. (1997), ‘Disability insurance rejection rates and the labor supply of older workers’, Journal of Public Economics, 108, 1162–83.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, S. S., Wetzels, C. M. M. P., Vlasblom, J. D. and Dex, S. (1996), ‘Women's labor force transitions in connection with childbirth: a panel data comparison between Germany, Sweden and Great Britain’, Journal of Population Economics, 9, 223–243.Google Scholar
Hetzler, Antoinette (2008), ‘Labour market activation policies for the long-term ill – a sick idea?’, Paper presented at the conference, Paper prepared for the IAB/DGS Conference, Activation Policies on the Fringes of Society, 15/16 May 2008, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Nürnberg, available online at http://doku.iab.de/veranstaltungen/2008/activation_2008_hetzler.pdf.Google Scholar
Knuth, Matthias (2007), ‘Implementing the new basic allowance for job seekers in Germany’, Discussion paper, Peer Review Programme of the European Employment Strategy, available online at http://pdf.mutual-learning-employment.net/pdf/DE%2007/discussionpaper_DE_07.pdf.Google Scholar
Knuth, Matthias (2008), ‘Aufstocken von Arbeitseinkommen durch Arbeitslosengeld II – eine verzwickte Geschichte’, Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation, available online at http://www.iaq.uni-due.de/aktuell/veroeff/2008/knuth_20081204.pdfGoogle Scholar
Konle-Seidl, Regina and Lang, Kristina (2006), ‘Von der Reduzierung zur Mobilisierung des Arbeitskräftepotenzials: Ansätze zur Integration von inaktiven und arbeitslosen Sozialleistungsbeziehern im internationalen Vergleich’, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Nürnberg (IAB-Forschungsbericht, 15), available online at http://doku.iab.de/forschungsbericht/2006/fb1506.pdf.Google Scholar
Overbye, Einar (2007), ‘Norwegian implementation of Hartz-style reforms: statements and comments’, Peer Review Programme of the European Employment Strategy, available online at http://pdf.mutual-learning-employment.net/pdf/DE%2007/Norway_DE_07.pdf.Google Scholar
Parsons, D. O. (1980), ‘The decline in male labor force participation’, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 117–34.Google Scholar
Stafford, Bruce et al. (2007), ‘New deal for disabled people: third synthesis report – key findings from the evaluation’, Research report 430, Department for Work and Pensions, London and Sydney, available online at http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rports2007-2008/rrep430.pdf.Google Scholar
Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2007), ‘Kindertagesbetreuung regional 2006: Ein Vergleich aller 439 Kreise in Deutschland’, Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder, available online at http://www.sozialpolitik-aktuell.de/docs/Kindertagesbetreuung_regional_2006.pdf.Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt (2006), ‘Armut und Lebensbedingungen: Ergebnisse aus Leben in Europa für Deutschland 2005’, Tabellenanhang zur Pressebroschüre, available online at http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pk/2006/EU-Silc/Tabellenanhang__EU__Silc,property=file.pdf.Google Scholar
Sundmacher, Torsten (2006), ‘Fördern und Fordern auch in der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung: Eine Untersuchung auf der Grundlage unterschiedlicher ökonomischer Verhaltenstheorien’, Sozialer Fortschritt, 55, 7, 168–78.Google Scholar
ZEW, IAQ, TNS Emnid (2008), ‘Evaluation der Experimentierklausel nach §6c SGB II – Vergleichende Evaluation des arbeitsmarktpolitischen Erfolgs der Modelle der Aufgabenwahrnehmung “Optierende Kommune” und “Arbeitsgemeinschaft”’, Untersuchungsfeld 3, ‘Wirkungs- und Effizienzanalyse’, Abschlussbericht, Mannheim.Google Scholar