Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:47:18.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychiatric Survivors and Experiential Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Mark Cresswell
Mark Cresswell*
Affiliation:
School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human rights may be categorised as belonging to ‘three generations’: political, social and ‘solidarity’ rights. This paper considers this schema theoretically, deploying the example of the ‘psychiatric survivor’ movement in Britain in support of its central claims. Psychiatric survivors comprise groups of psychiatric patients who have campaigned both for political and social rights in addition to a singular form of ‘right’, which is referred to here as ‘experiential’. The paper clarifies the meaning of the ‘experiential right’ and, drawing upon aspects of social theory, considers how it is to be understood in the context of the ‘three generations’ schema.

Type
Themed Section on Mental Health and Human Rights
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 231 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, N. (2003), Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Barker, P., Campbell, P. and Davidson, B. (1999), From the Ashes of Experience: Reflections on Madness, Survival and Growth, London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Baldock, J., Manning, N. and Vickerstaff, S. (eds.) (2003), Social Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. and Berke, J. (1971), Mary Barnes: Two Accounts of a Journey through Madness, London: MacGibbon & Key.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969), Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1992), Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, P. (1983), ‘Letter’, OpenMind, 4, 15.Google Scholar
Campbell, P. (1985), ‘Letter: advocacy’, OpenMind, 18, 17.Google Scholar
Campbell, P. (1989), ‘The self-advocacy movement in the UK’, in Brackx, A. and Grimshaw, C. (eds.), Mental Health Care in Crisis, London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Campbell, P. (1991), ‘Mental health self-advocacy in the United Kingdom’, in Fransen, Vivian E. (ed.), Mental Health Services in the United States and England, Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.Google Scholar
Campbell, P. (1992), ‘A survivor's view of community psychiatry’, Journal of Mental Health, 1, 2, 117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, P. (1993), ‘Letter’, OpenMind, 61, 10–11.Google Scholar
Campbell, P. (1996), ‘The history of the user movement in the United Kingdom’, in Heller, T. et al. (eds.), Mental Health Matters: A Reader, London: Macmillan, pp. 218–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, P. (1999), ‘The service user/survivor movement’, in Newnes, C. et al. (eds.), This Is Madness: A Critical Look at Psychiatry and the Future of Mental Health Services, Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. (2005a), ‘Psychiatric ‘survivors’ and testimonies of self-harm’, Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1668–77.Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. (2005b), ‘Self-harm “survivors” and psychiatry in England, 1988–1996’, Social Theory and Health, 3, 259–85.Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. (2007), ‘Self-harm and the politics of experience’, Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, 7, 1, 9–17.Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. (2008), ‘Szasz and his interlocutors: reconsidering Thomas Szasz's “Myth of Mental Illness” thesis’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 1, 23–44.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. (1996), Intersubjectivity: The Fabric of Social Becoming, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. (2002), Making Sense of Social Movements, Philadelphia PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. (2006), Contesting Psychiatry, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1960), The Division of Labour in Society, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Herman, J. (1994), Trauma and Recovery, London: Pandora.Google Scholar
James, A. (2001), Raising Our Voices: An Account of the Hearing Voices Movement, Gloucester: Handsell.Google Scholar
Klug, F. (2000), Values for a Godless Age: The Story of the UK's New Bill of Rights, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1990), The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lefort, C. (1986), The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Lefort, C. (1988), Democracy and Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1968), ‘Preface to A Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy’, in Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1968), Selected Works, London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1975), ‘On the Jewish question’, in Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1975), Collected Works, Vol. 3, Marx and Engels: 1843–44, London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Mubangizi, J. (2004), ‘Towards a new approach to the classification of human rights with specific reference to the African context’, African Human Rights Law Journal, 4, 1, 93–107.Google Scholar
Pembroke, L. (ed.) (1994), Self-Harm: Perspectives from Personal Experience, London: Survivors Speak Out.Google Scholar
Pembroke, L. (1995), ‘National self-harm network’, Openmind, 73, 13.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, D. (2007), ‘New mental health legislation for England and Wales: some aspects of consensus and conflict’, Journal of Social Policy, 36, 1, 79–95.Google Scholar
Rubin, E. (1949), Experimenta Psychologia, Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Sayce, L. (2000), From Psychiatric Patient to Citizen: Overcoming Discrimination and Social Exclusion, Basingstoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. (1996), Only Paradoxes to Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, P. (1982), Psychopolitics, London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Spandler, H. (2007), From Social Exclusion to Inclusion? A Critique of the Inclusion Imperative in Mental Health, Medical Sociology online, 2, 2, 3–16.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (1986), ‘Editor's introduction’, in Lefort, C., The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. (2003), Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vasak, K. (1977), ‘Human rights: a thirty-year struggle − the sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, UNESCO Courier, 30, 11.Google Scholar
Williams, P. (1991), The Alchemy of Race and Rights, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
ŽiŽek, S. (2005), ‘Against human rights’, New Left Review, 34.Google Scholar