Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:45:21.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Property and Social Citizenship: Social Policy beyond the North

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Sony Pellissery  and
Ivar Lødemel
Sony Pellissery
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Policy, National Law School of India University, Bangalore E-mail: [email protected]
Ivar Lødemel
Affiliation:
Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how the property rights in land have come to be a constitutive element of social citizenship. Reviewing the theoretical developments on the idea of social citizenship since Marshall’s seminal essay on Citizenship and Social Class (1950), this introductory article identifies four processes which bring property rights to the centre stage of social rights. First, recognition of entitlement beyond ownership opens up different social functions of property. Social citizenship as a tool is able to demand contextually appropriate rights from the bundle of rights that property is constituted of. Second, the idea of social citizenship is global today, and has transcended nation-state boundaries. How trade and communications impact property in land shapes the realisation of social rights. Three, active citizens contribute to the creation of public spaces in emerging urban residential areas. Citizens make social claims on such spaces through radical forms of insurgent citizenship. Four, planning as a tool, which organises property for the realisation of citizens’ social rights, is able to meet the competing objectives of human rights and speculative profiteering by real estate owners. These four aspects become essential to understand how social citizenship is unfolding, particularly in the Global South.

Keywords

Social citizenshipproperty rightsGlobal Southsocial rights
Type
Themed Section: Property and Social Citizenship
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 275 - 292
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, G. S. and Peñalver, E. (2010) Property and Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, T. (2007) ‘Property as fundamental right in India, Europe and South Africa’, Asia Pacific Law Review, 15, 2, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alterman, R. (2011) Takings International, New York: American BarAssociation.Google Scholar
Amore, K., Baker, M. and Howden-Chapman, P. (2011) ‘The ETHOS definition and classification of homelessness: An analysis’, European Journal of Homelessness, 5, 2, 19–38.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1958) Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1985) ‘How should we measure poverty? Some conceptual issues’, ESRC Programme on Taxation, Incentives and Distribution of Income, Discussion Paper No 82, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Bloemraad, I. (2018) ‘Theorising the power of citizenship as claims-making’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 1, 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D. W. (2006) Sufficient Reason, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, A. H. Y. (2011) ‘The Law of Property and the evolving system of property rights in China’, The Development of the Chinese Legal System – Change and Challenges, London and New York: Routledge, 81–112.Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1893) The Distribution of Wealth, London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Crawford, C. (2011) ‘Social function of property and human capacity to flourish’, Fordham Law Review, 80, 1089–134.Google Scholar
Cunha, A. S. (2011) ‘The social function of property in Brazilian Law’, Fordham Law Review, 80, 1171–81.Google Scholar
Davis, D. E. and Fernández, J. C. (2019) ‘Collective property rights and social citizenship: recent trends in Urban Latin America’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746419000459.Google Scholar
Davy, B. (2012) Land Policy, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Davy, B. (2014) ‘Human dignity and property in land – a human rights approach’, in Pellissery, S., Davy, B. and Jacobs, H. (eds.), Land Policies in India, Singapore: Springer, 1–34.Google Scholar
Davy, B. and Pellissery, S. (2013) ‘Citizenship promise (un)fulfilled: the right to housing in informal settings’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, S68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davy, B., Davy, U. and Leisering, L. (2013) ‘The global, the social and rights: new perspectives on social citizenship’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, S1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1967) ‘Toward a theory of property rights’, American Economic Review, 57, 2, 347–59.Google Scholar
De Soto, H. (2000) The Mystery of Capital, London: Blackswan.Google Scholar
Dey Biswas, S. (2019) ‘Social citizenship and plural values of land: land acquisition cases from India’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746419000496.Google Scholar
Domestic Workers Union of India (2019) ‘Recommendations to the new social security code’, report based on the consultation at the Institute of Public Policy, Bangalore dated 17-18 October 2019.Google Scholar
Dovey, K. (2010) Becoming Places: Urbanism, Architecture, Identity, Power, Melbourne: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. (2006) ‘Citizenship and property rights: a new look at social contract theory’, The Journal of Politics, 68, 3, 544–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsinga, M. and Hoekstra, J. (2015) ‘The Janus face of homeownership-based welfare’, Critical Housing Studies, 2, 1, 32–41.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
FEANTSA (2007) FEANTSA Proposal: A Retrospective Module on Homelessness for Household Surveys, Brussels: FEANTSA.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, K. (2000) Kant and Modern Political Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S. R. and Bonilla, D. (2011) ‘The social function of property: a comparative perspective’, Fordham Law Review, 80, 1003–15.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition, London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, J. (1992) Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Friendly, A. (2019) ‘The place of social citizenship and property rights in Brazil’s ‘right to the city’ debate’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746419000435.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2011) The Origin of Political Order, New York: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1982) Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of Public Sphere, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162, 3859, 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, D, (1973/1978) Social Justice and the City, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (1996) Re-Stating Social and Political Change, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Holston, J. (1998) ‘Spaces of insurgent citizenship’, in Sandercock, L. (ed.), Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History, Berkeley: University of California Press, 37–77.Google Scholar
Holston, J. (2009) ‘Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries: insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries’, City and Society, 21, 2, 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holston, J. and Appadurai, A. (1996) ‘Cities and citizenship’, Public Culture, 8, 2, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO (2018) Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture, 3rd edn, International Labour Organisation, https://ilo.userservices.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/41ILO_INST/1252879760002676 [accessed 03.08.2019].Google Scholar
Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. (2007) ‘Investigating citizenship: an agenda for citizenship studies’, Citizenship Studies, 11, 1, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, H. M. (2013) ‘Private property and human rights: a mismatch in the 21st Century’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, S85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, H. and Hvinden, B. (2013) ‘Towards post-Marshallian framework for the analysis of social citizenship’, in Evers, A. and Guillemard, A.M. (eds.), Social policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F. (2012) European Foundations of Welfare State, Amsterdam: Berghagn Books.Google Scholar
King, D. and Waldron, J. (1988) ‘Citizenship, social citizenship and the defence of welfare provision’, British Journal of Political Science, 18, 4, 415–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, D. B. and Robinson, J. (2011) ‘Property: a bundle of rights? Prologue to the property symposium’, Economic Journal Watch, 8, 3, 193–204.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1974/1991) The Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1968) The Land Ethic, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipton, M. and Saghai, Y. (2016) ‘Food security, farmland access ethics, and land reform’, Global Food Security, 12, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (1998) ‘From equality to social inclusion: New Labour and the welfare state’, Critical Social Policy, 18, 2, 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, C. (2011) ‘Property and citizenship: conceptually connecting land rights and belonging in Africa’, Africa Spectrum, 46, 3, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. (1987) ‘Ruling class strategies and citizenship’, Sociology, 21, 339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. (1965) Social Policy in the Twentieth Century, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. (1973) Class, Citizenship, and Social Development; Essays, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. (1981) The Right to Welfare and Other Essays, London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844) On the Jewish Question, https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/ [accessed 03.01.2019].Google Scholar
Mau, S. (2004) ‘Welfare regimes and the norms of social exchange’, Current Sociology, 52, 1, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazza, L. (2017) ‘An Ancient Future’, in Haselsberger, B. (ed.), Encounters in Planning Thought, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1968) Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, Volumes 1–3, New York: Twentieth Century Fund and Pantheon.Google Scholar
Olsen, G. M. (2018) ‘Housing policy, the welfare state and social inequality’, in Greve, B. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Routledge, 378–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2009) ‘Design principles of robust property rights institutions’, in Ingram, G. K. and Hong, Y. (eds.), Property Rights and Land Policies, Cambridge, M. A.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
Paine, T. (1797) Agrarian Justice, Accessed on Oxford scholarship, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928903.003.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1965) ‘Full citizenship for the Negro American? A sociological problem’, Daedalus, 94, 4, 1009–54.Google Scholar
Payne, G. (2001) ‘Urban land tenure policy options: titles or rights?’, Habitat International, 25, 415–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellissery, S. and Jacobs, H. M. (2014) ‘Property in India: global perspectives, national issues’, in Pellissery, S., Davy, B. and Jacobs, H. M. (eds.), Land Policies in India, Singapore: Springer, 207–27.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E. (2009) ‘Property, community, and the problem of distributive justice’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 10, 1, 194–216.Google Scholar
Perlman, J. (2010) Favela: Four Decades of Living on the Edge in Rio de Janeiro, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, M. A.: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pocock, J. (1995) ‘The ideal of citizenship since classical times’, in Beiner, R. (ed.), Theorizing Citizenship, Albany: State University of New York Press, 29–53.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Powell, M. (1995) ‘The strategy of equality revisited’, Journal of Social Policy, 24, 2, 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. (2002) ‘The hidden history of social citizenship’ Journal of Citizenship Studies, 6, 3, 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Harvard: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Rolnik, R. (2013) ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context’, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session25/Documents/A_HRC_25_54_Add.2_ENG.DOC [accessed 02.09.2017].Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1998) ‘Human rights, rationality and sentimentality’, in Rorty, R. (ed.), Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, Vol 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoones, I. (2009) ‘Livelihoods perspectives and rural development’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36, 1, 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice, Boston: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikor, T. and Muller, D. (2009) ‘The limits of state-led land reform: an introduction’, World Development, 37, 8, 1307–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinden, A. (2007) ‘The tragedy of the commons and the myth of a private property solution’, University of Colorado Law Review, 78, 2, 533–612.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (1986) The Ethnic Origins of Nations, Oxford: Basic Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stephens, M. and Fitzpatrick, S. (2007) ‘Welfare regimes, housing systems and homelessness: how are they linked?’, European Journal of Homelessness 1, 201–12.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1995) ‘Two conceptions of citizenship’, British Journal of Sociology, 46, 1, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stjerno, S. and Halvorsen, K. (2008) Work, Oil and Welfare: The Welfare State in Norway, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H. (1912) The Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century, New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1995) ‘Citizenship, identity and social history’, International Review of Social History, 40, 3, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmus, R. M. (1970) The Gift Relationship, London: The New Press.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1974) ‘Social policy’, in Abel-Smith, B. and Titmuss, K. (eds.), Social Policy: An Introduction, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Torgersen, U. (1987) ‘Housing: the wobbly pillar of the welfare state’, in Turner, B., Kemeny, J. and Lundqvist, L. J. (eds.), Between State and Market: Housing in the Post-Industrial Era, Gävle: The National Swedish Institute for Building Research, 171–90.Google Scholar
Turner, B. (1990) ‘Outline of a theory of citizenship’, Sociology, 24, 2, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Habitat and GLTN (2008) Secure Land Rights for All, Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
UN Habitat (2015) UN Habitat: Global Activities Report – 2015, Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2008) The World Investment Report, Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1991) ‘Homelessness and the issue of freedom’, UCLA Law Review, 39, 295–324.Google Scholar
World Bank (2014) Land and Food Security, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/land-and-food-security1 [accessed 31.05.2019].Google Scholar
World Bank (2018) Employment in Agriculture, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS [accessed 03.06.2019].Google Scholar
World Resource Institute (WRI) (2019) Aqueduct 3.0’s Water Risk Indicators https://www.wri.org/resources/data-sets/aqueduct-30-country-rankings [accessed 01.10.2019].Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1988) ‘Polity and group difference: a critique of the ideal of universal citizenship’, Ethics, 99, 2, 250–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar