Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T05:42:52.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Practical Politics of Doughnut Economics and Climate Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2025

Peter Taylor-Gooby Open the ORCID record for Peter Taylor-Gooby [Opens in a new window]
Peter Taylor-Gooby*
Affiliation:
University of Kent, Kent, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An attractive way to address both the climate crisis and the problem of global inequality is to tax rich countries, individuals and businesses, who are responsible for the greater part of carbon emissions, and redistribute the proceeds to create carbon-neutral infrastructure and address human needs through state action (see Raworth 2017 Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist, Penguin Random House; Gough 2017 Heat, Need and Human Greed, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.). However the dominant value framework in which ideas about wealth, need, and redistribution are embedded centres on deservingness. This largely justifies existing poverty and wealth-holdings, making redistribution within and beyond the rich countries of the global North hard to achieve. Two developments – the ‘deliberative wave’ of citizen participation in government, and the impact of crises in nurturing prosocial values – point to a rapid and sustained value shift. This paper reviews and analyses evidence to consider the practical politics of oughnut economics.

Keywords

Doughnut economicsclimate changehuman needattitudes to inequalitydeservingness
Type
Article
Information
Social Policy and Society , First View , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D. (2021) Societal Cohesion in Britain Through Eighteen Months of COVID-19, London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
Abrams, D. and Vasiljevic, M. D. (2014) ‘How does macroeconomic change affect social identity (and vice versa)?: Insights from the European context’, Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14, 1, 311–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainscough, J. and Willis, R. (2024) ‘Embedding deliberation: guiding the use of deliberative mini-publics in climate policy-making’, Climate Policy, DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2303337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arıkan, G. and Günay, D. (2021) ‘Public attitudes towards climate change’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23, 1, 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120951013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axel, F. and Meyer, R. (2004) ‘Climate change in environmental attitudes?’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 33, 119–137.Google Scholar
Baumberg, B. (2016) ‘The stigma of claiming benefits’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 2, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechert, I. and Osberg, L. (2023) ‘A few people make all the difference’, International Journal of Sociology, 53, 6, 421–447, DOI: 10.1080/00207659.2023.2274713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J., Middleton, S., Davis, A., Oldfield, N., Smith, N., Cusworth, J. and Williams, J. (2008) An MIS for Britain: What do People Think? University of Loughborough.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2012) Deliberative research as a tool to make value judgements, CASEpaper 159, LSE.Google Scholar
Chan, S., Boran, I., van Asselt, H., Iacobuta, G., Niles, N., Rietig, K., Scobie, M., Bansard, J.S., Pugley, D.D., Delina, L.L., Eichhorn, F., Ellinger, P., Enechi, O., Hale, T., Hermwille, L., Hickmann, T., Honegger, M., Epstein, A.H., La Hoz Theuer, S., Mizo, R., Sun, Y., Toussaint, P. and Wambugu, G. (2019) ‘Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance’, Wires, 20, 1.Google Scholar
Chancel, L., Bothe, P. and Voituriez, T. (2023) Climate Inequality Report 2023, World Inequality Lab Study 2023/1, WIL Paris.Google Scholar
Climate Change Tracker (2024) https://climatechangetracker.org/co2/yearly-atmospheric-co2 [accessed 7.12.2024].Google Scholar
Cologna, V. and Siegrist, M. (2020) ‘The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, F. L. (1979) Who should be Helped: Public Support for Social Services, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Coughlin, R. M. (1980) Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy, Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, RS 42.Google Scholar
CQC (2023) Experts by Experience, https://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/jobs/experts-experience Google Scholar
Davis, A., Hecht, K., Burchardt, T., Gough, I., Hirsch, D., Rowlingson, K. and Summers, K. (2020) Living on Different Incomes in London. CASE report 127, London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (and Melrose, M. ) (1999) Poverty, Riches and Social Citizenship, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. (2020) Understanding Human Need, Policy Press.Google Scholar
Dean, H. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1992) Dependency Culture, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991) A Theory of Human Need, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsässer, L. and Schäfer, A. (2023) ‘Political inequality in rich democracies’, Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, M., Seva, J. and Kulin, J. (2019) ‘Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes’, Global Environmental Change, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanning, A. L., O’Neill, D. W., Hickel, J. and Roux, N. (2022) ‘The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations’, Nature Sustainability, 5, 26–36, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00799-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. (2009) When the People Speak, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Fleming, D. A., Chong, A. and Bejarano, H. (2014) ‘Trust and reciprocity in the aftermath of natural disasters’, The Journal of Development Studies, 50, 1482–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, S., Ellersgaard, C., Reeves, A. and Grau Larsen, A. (2023) ‘The meaning of merit’, Social Forces, soad131. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad131 Google Scholar
Friedman, S. and Laurison, D. (2020) The Glass Ceiling, Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, M. and Koch, M. (2019) ‘Public support for sustainable welfare compared’, Sustainability, 11, 15, 4146. Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., Sahakian, M., Gumbert, T., Di Giulio, A., Maniates, M., Lorek, S. and Graf, A. (2021) Consumption Corridor, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Systems Institute (GSI) (2023) Global Tipping Points Report 2023, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. and Bächtiger, A. (2023) ‘Catching the ‘deliberative wave’? how (disaffected) citizens assess deliberative citizen forums’, British Journal of Political Science, 53, 1, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2017) Heat, Need and Human Greed, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J. S., and Pierson, P. (2010) ‘Winner-take-all politics: public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States’, Politics and Society, 38, 2, 152–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadler, M. (2005) ‘Why do people accept different income ratios?’, Acta Sociologica, 48, 2, 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699305053768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K. J. (2003) ‘Greed, envy, and admiration’, American Political Science Review, 117, 1, 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawdon, J. and Ryan, J. (2011) ‘Social relations that generate and sustain solidarity after a mass tragedy’, Social Forces, 89, 4, 1363–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, K. (2017) A Relational Analysis of Top Incomes and Wealth, Inequalities Institute WP 11, London: LSE.Google Scholar
Heiserman, N. and Simpson, B. (2017) ‘Higher inequality increases the gap in the perceived merit of the rich and poor’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 80, 3, 243–253, https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272517711919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickel, J. (2020) Less is More, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Horwitz, S. R. and Dovidio, J. F. (2017) ‘The rich—love them or hate them?’, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, E. (2014) ‘A global politics of pity?’, International Political Sociology, 8, 1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Panel on Climate Change (2023) AR6 Synthesis Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/ [accessed 31.1.2025].Google Scholar
Jakobsson, N., Muttarak, R. and Schoyen, M. A. (2018) ‘Dividing the pie in the eco-social state,’ Environment and Planning C, 36, 313–339.Google Scholar
Kim, T. (2024) ‘Did the COVID-19 pandemic fuel public support for social protection?’, Journal of Social Policy, 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/S004727942400014X (First View).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, C. (2023) Serious Money, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Koo, H. J., Piff, P. K. and Shariff, A. F. (2023) ‘If I could do it, so can they’, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14, 3, 333–341, https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221098921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnarajan, S., Doucette, J. and Andersen, D. (2023) ‘Early-adulthood economic experiences and the formation of democratic support’, British Journal of Political Science, 53, 2, 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvaløy, B., Finseraas, H. and Listhaug, O. (2012) ‘The publics’ concern for global warming’, Journal of Peace Research, 49, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laenen, T. and Roosma, F. (2022), ‘Solidarity Who should get what and why?’, in Yerkes, M. A. and Bal, M. (eds.), Insights from Welfare Deservingness Theory and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–75.Google Scholar
Lage, J., Johannes, T., Zell-Ziegler, C., Best, B., Cordroch, L. and Wiese, F. (2023) ‘Citizens call for sufficiency and regulation’, Energy Research and Social Science, 104, 103254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, W. and Steinberger, J. K. (2017) ‘Human well-being and climate change mitigation’, Wires Climate Change, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C. A. (2016) ‘How three narratives of modernity justify economic inequality’, Acta Sociologica, 49, 2, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, A. (2020) Climate Change and the Nation State: The Realist Case, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (2024) Understanding Theories and Concepts in Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mandelli, M. (2022) ‘Understanding ecosocial policies’, European Review of Labour and Research, 28, 3, 333–348. Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1954) Motivation and Personality, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Merz, J. J., Barnard, P., Rees, W. E., Smith, D., Maroni, M., Rhodes, C. J., Bajaj, J., Joy, M., Weidmann, T. and Sutherland, R. (2023) ‘World scientists’ warning’, Science Progress, 106, 3, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.25455/wgtn.24173100 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mijs, J. J. (2019) ‘The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand’, Socio-Economic Review, 19, 1, 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward-Hopkins, J. and Oswald, Y. (2021) ‘‘Fair’ inequality, consumption and climate mitigation’, Environmental Research Letters, 16, 034007. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D. and Yannick, O. (2020) ‘Providing decent living with minimum energy’, Glob Environ Change, 65, 102168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. (2023) Power and mobilization, in Creating an Ecosocial Future, ch 7 Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Nast, C. (2020) ‘Can universal basic income fix the coronavirus crisis?’ Wired UK. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/can-universal-basic-income-fix-the-coronavirus-crisis [accessed 18.11.2024].Google Scholar
Nettle, D., Johnson, E., Johnson, M. and Saxe, R. (2021). ‘Why has the COVID-19 pandemic increased support for Universal Basic Income?’ Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 1, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, K. (2020) ‘Spain to become first country in Europe to roll out a universal basic income’, The Independent, 6 April.Google Scholar
NHS (2019) Role Summary: Experts by Experience, https://www.england.nhs.uk, uploads 2019/11.Google Scholar
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F. and Steinberger, J. (2018) ‘A good life for all within planetary boundaries’, Nature Sustainability, 1, 88–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2020) Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2021) Learning about Inequality and Demand for Redistribution, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2024) Total Private and Official Flows, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oswald, Y., Owen, A. and Steinberger, J. K. (2020) ‘Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories’, Nature Energy, 5, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, A. and Gugushvili, D. (2020) ‘Ecosocial divides in Europe’, Sustainability, 12, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Parker, K. (2012) Yes, the Rich are Different, Pew Research Centre Report.Google Scholar
Participedia (2024) Participedia, https://participedia.net/, consulted September 2024.Google Scholar
Pickard, J. (2020) ‘More than 100 UK opposition politicians call for universal basic income after lockdown’, Financial Times, 21 April.Google Scholar
Pierson, M. and Sundell, A. (2023) ‘The rich have a slight edge’, British Journal of Political Science, 1–12, DOI: 10.1017/S0007123423000066 Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2020) Capital and Ideology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plant, R., Taylor-Gooby, P. and Lesser, H. (1980) Political Philosophy and Social Welfare, Routledge.Google Scholar
Poverty and Inequality Commission (PIC), Scotland (2024) Experts by Experience Panel, https://povertyinequality.scot/about/experts-by-experience-panel/ [accessed 19.11.24].Google Scholar
Prabhakar, R., Lymer, A. and Rowlingson, K. (2017) ‘Does information about wealth inequality and inheritance tax raise public support for wealth taxes?’, in Peeters, B., Gribnau, H. and Badisco, J. (eds.), Building Trust in Taxation, Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qureshi, Z. (2023) Rising Inequality: A Major Issue of our Time, Brookings.Google Scholar
Rao, N. D. and Min, J. (2017). ‘Decent living standards’, Social Indicators Research, 1–20. Google ScholarPubMed
Raworth, K. (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist, Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Reeves, A. and Friedman, S. (2024) Born to Rule, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I., Buskens, V., van de Rijt, A., Vergeldt, N. and van der Lippe, T. (2021) ‘How rich is too rich?’, Social Indicators Research, 154, 1, 115–143, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02552-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J. and Steffen, W. (2009) ‘Planetary boundaries’, Ecology and Society, 14, 2, 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlingson, K. and Connor, S. (2011) ‘The ‘deserving’ rich? inequality, morality and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 40, 437–452, DOI: 10.1017/S0047279410000668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowntree, B. S. (1901) Poverty: a Study of Town Life, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Rodriguez, A., Jetten, G. and Rodriguez-Bailon, R. (2019) ‘Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 6, 1114–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, R, (2017) Uneasy Street, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
Spade, D. (2020) ‘Solidarity not charity’, Social Text, 38, 1, 142, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spies-Butcher, B. and Stebbing, A. (2016) ‘Climate change and the welfare state?’, Journal of Sociology, 52, 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhay, E., Klašnja, K. and Rivero, G. (2021) ‘Ideology of affluence: rich americans’ explanations for inequality and attitudes toward redistribution’, The Journal of Politics, 3-83, 1. DOI: 10.1086/709672 Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P., Hvinden, B., Mau, S., Leruth, B., Schoyen, M. A. and Gyory, A. (2019) ‘Moral economies of the welfare state’, Acta Sociologica, 62, 2, 119–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2005) Attitudes to Social Justice, IPPR Report, London.Google Scholar
Tjernström, E. and Tietenberg, T. (2008) ‘Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies?’, Ecological Economics, 65, 2, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UCL (2024) ‘Deliberative Democracy’, The Constitution Unit, UCL.Google Scholar
UN (2021) Climate Change ‘Biggest Threat Modern Humans Have Ever Faced, Press release, 21.2.2021. Google Scholar
UNDRR (2020) Huge Rise in Natural Disasters, UNDRR.Google Scholar
Walker, J., Tepper, S. J. and Gilovich, T. (2021) ‘People are more tolerant of inequality when it is expressed in terms of individuals rather than groups at the top’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T. and Steinberger, J. (2020) ‘‘Scientists’ warning on affluence’, Nature Communications, 11, 3107, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y [accessed 19.11.2024].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, R., Curato, N. and Smith, G. (2022) ‘Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis’, Wires, 13, 2, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.759 Google Scholar
World Inequality Database (2024) https://wid.world/ [accessed 31.1.2025].Google Scholar
World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2023) The Global Climate 2011–2020: A Decade of Acceleration, WMO.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. (2017) ‘Political orientation, environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes’, Energy Economics, 63, 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zitelmann, R. (2021) ‘Attitudes to wealth in seven countries’, Economic Affairs, 41, 211–224. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ecaf211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar