Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:22:36.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Making Safe’: A Coordinated Community Response to Empowering Victims and Tackling Perpetrators of Domestic Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2013

Alan Clarke  and
Sarah Wydall
Alan Clarke
Affiliation:
Department of Law and Criminology, Aberystwyth University E-mail: [email protected]
Sarah Wydall
Affiliation:
Department of Law and Criminology, Aberystwyth University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article describes an exploratory study of the Making Safe Scheme, which is a multi-agency initiative designed to provide a coordinated and integrated response to domestic violence by focusing on both victims and perpetrators. A key feature of the intervention is that it enables victims to remain in their own homes, provided it is considered safe to do so, and re-houses perpetrators. Consequently, the wrong-doer leaves the home and practitioners can work with families in their established communities to prevent further abuse. In 2008, the project was awarded the Butler Trust Public Protection Award for its innovative work with victims and offenders. The findings from this study focus on a number of themes: perpetrator accountability, the changing balance of power in abusive relationships and the increased opportunities for victims and their families to engage in recovery work whilst remaining in the family home.

Keywords

Domestic violenceperpetrator programmespreventionvictims
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 393 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, H. (2007) Supporting Women after Domestic Violence: Loss, Trauma and Recovery, London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Barrera, M. (1986) ‘Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models’, American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 4, 413–45.Google Scholar
Bell, M. E. and Goodman, L. A. (2001) ‘Supporting battered women involved with the court system: an evaluation of a law-school based advocacy intervention’, Violence against Women, 7, 12, 1377–404.Google Scholar
Bilby, C. and Hatcher, R. (2004) Early Stages in the Development of the Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme (IDAP): Implementing the Duluth Domestic Violence Pathfinder, Home Office Online Report 29/04, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Binney, V., Harknell, G. and Nixon, J. (1981) Leaving Violent Men, Leeds: Women's Aid Federation of England.Google Scholar
Blacklock, N. (2001) ‘Domestic violence: working with perpetrators, the community and its institutions’, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7, 1, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossy, J. and Coleman, S. (2000) Womanspeak: Parliamentary Domestic Violence Internet Consultation, Bristol: Women's Aid Federation of England.Google Scholar
Bowen, E., Brown, L. and Gilchrist, E. (2002) ‘Evaluating probation based offender programmes for domestic violence perpetrators: a pro-feminist approach’, The Howard Journal, 41, 3, 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, K., Sarre, S., Tarling, R. and Wilkinson, M. (2010) The Delivery of Domestic Abuse Programmes: An Implementation Study of the Delivery of Domestic Abuse Programmes in Probation Areas and Her Majesty's Prison Service, Ministry of Justice Research Series 15/10, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Dobash, R. E. and Dobash, R. P. (1992) Women, Violence and Social Change, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dobash, R., Dobash, R., Cavanagh, K. and Lewis, R. (1996) Research Evaluation of Programmes for Violent Men, Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
Dupuis, A. and Thorns, D. C. (1998) ‘Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security’, The Sociological Review, 46, 1, 24–47.Google Scholar
Dutton, M., Goodman, L., Lennig, D., Murphy, J. and Kaltman, S. (2006) Ecological Model of Battered Women's Experience over Time, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
Eadie, T. and Knight, C. (2002) ‘Domestic violence programmes: reflections on the shift from independent to statutory provision’, The Howard Journal, 41, 2, 167–81.Google Scholar
Erez, E. and Ibarra, P. R. (2007) ‘Making your home a shelter: electronic monitoring and victim re-entry in domestic violence cases’, British Journal of Criminology, 47, 1, 100–20.Google Scholar
Fleury, R. E., Sullivan, C. M. and Bybee, D. I. (2000) ‘When ending the relationship does not end the violence: women's experiences of violence by former partners’, Violence Against Women, 6, 12, 1363–83.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Control in Contemporary Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, E., Johnson, R., Takriti, R., Weston, S., Beech, A. and Kebbell, M. (2003) Domestic Violence Offenders: Characteristics and Offending-Related Needs, Findings 217, London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office.Google Scholar
Gondolf, E. W. (2002) Batterer Intervention Systems: Issues, Outcomes and Recommendations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Great Britain (2004) Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Great Britain (2010) Crime and Security Act 2010, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Harne, L. and Radford, J. (2008) Tackling Domestic Violence: Theories, Policies, and Practice, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hester, M. and Westmarland, N. (2006) Service Provision for Perpetrators of Domestic Violence, Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Hester, M., Westmarland, N., Gangoli, G., Wilkinson, M., O'Kelly, C., Kent, A. and Diamond, A. (2006) Domestic Violence Perpetrators: Identifying Needs to Inform Early Intervention, Bristol: University of Bristol in Association with the Northern Rock Foundation and the Home Office.Google Scholar
Holder, R. (2001) ‘Domestic and family violence: criminal justice interventions’, Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse Issues Paper, 3, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hoyle, C. and Sanders, A. (2000) ‘Police response to domestic violence: from victim choice to victim empowerment?’, British Journal of Criminology, 40, 1, 14–36.Google Scholar
Ibarra, P. R. and Erez, E. (2005) ‘Victim-centric diversion? The electronic monitoring of domestic violence cases’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 2, 259–76.Google Scholar
Jones, A., Pleace, N. and Quilgars, D. (2002) Firm Foundations: An Evaluation of Shelter's Homelessness to Home Service, London: Shelter.Google Scholar
Jones, A., Bretherton, J., Bowles, R. and Croucher, K. (2010) The Effectiveness of Schemes to Enable Households at Risk of Domestic Violence to Remain in Their Homes, research report, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. B. and Johnson, M. P. (2008) ‘Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: research update and implications for interventions’, Family Court Review, 46, 3, 476–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malos, E. and Hague, G. (1997) ‘Women, housing, homelessness and domestic violence’, Women's Studies International Forum, 20, 3, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netto, G., Pawson, H. and Sharp, C. (2009) ‘Preventing homelessness due to domestic violence: providing a safe space or closing the door to new possibilities’, Social Policy and Administration, 43, 7, 719–35.Google Scholar
Pawson, H. (2001) Repeat Homelessness in Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.Google Scholar
Pence, E. and Paymar, M. (1986) Power and Control: Tactics for Men Who Batter, Duluth, MN: Minnesota Program Development.Google Scholar
Porteous, J. D. (1976) ‘Home: the territorial core’, Geographical Review, 66, 4, 383–90.Google Scholar
Randall, P. (1997) Adult Bullying: Perpetrators and Victims, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rees, A. and Rivet, M. (2005) ‘“Let a hundred flowers bloom, let a hundred schools of thought contend”: towards a variety in programmes for perpetrators of domestic violence’, Probation Journal, 52, 3, 277–88.Google Scholar
Reeve, K., Casey, R. and Goudie, R. (2006) Homeless Women: Still Being Failed Yet Striving to Survive, London: Crisis, http://www.crisis.org.uk/publications-search.php?fullitem=182 (accessed 09.03.2012).Google Scholar
Saunders, A. (1995) ‘It Hurts Me Too’: Children's Experiences of Domestic Violence and Refuge Life, London: ChildLine/Women's Aid Federation.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1989) ‘Space, urbanism and the created environment’, in Held, D. and Thompson, J. (eds.), Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his Critics, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, M., Falk, D. and Elliott, B. (2002) ‘Enhancing coordinated community responses to reduce recidivism in cases of domestic violence’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 5, 551–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, N., Miller, P. and Richardson-Foster, H. (2012) ‘Engaging with children's and parents’ perspectives on domestic violence’, Child and Family Social Work, 17, 2, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, E. (2007) Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, J. (2002) ‘Domestic violence and women's safety: feminist challenges to restorative justice’, in Strang, H. and Braithwaite, J. (eds.), Restorative Justice and Family Violence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–61.Google Scholar
Walby, S. and Allen, J. (2004) Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study, No. 276, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Warr, M. and Ellison, C. G. (2000) ‘Rethinking social reactions to crime: personal and altruistic fear in family households’, American Sociological Review, 106, 3, 551–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, M. (2001) ‘“I must get out”: the geographies of domestic violence’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 3, 365–82.Google Scholar
Westmarland, N. and Kelly, L. (2012) ‘Why extending measurements of “success” in domestic violence perpetrator programmes matters for social work’, British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs049.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., Johnson, H. and Daly, M. (1995) ‘Lethal and non-lethal violence against wives’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 3, 331–62.Google Scholar
Wydall, S. (2010) ‘“Making Safe”: a multi-agency scheme in Scarborough and Ryedale’, Respect Newsletter, Autumn: Young People and Domestic Violence, 31–4.Google Scholar