Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:58:18.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mainstreaming Effective Employment Support for Individuals with Health Conditions: An Analytical Framework for the Effective Design of Modified Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2018

Adam Whitworth
Adam Whitworth*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is a highly effective model of employment support for individuals with severe mental health conditions. Its potential modification for new settings and larger cohorts is of keen interest across advanced economies given shared health-related (un)employment challenges. Despite mushrooming policy interest and activity around modified IPS a significant barrier and risk at present is the absence of a well-considered analytical framework to enable structured critical reflection about the effective translation of IPS principles and fidelity into modified IPS services. This article fills this void through the presentation for the first time in the literature of such an analytical framework, unpacking as it does so a set of key original analytical distinctions that are unhelpfully homogenised in current literature and policy thinking and highlighting the wider potential of IPS principles and models to the nature of good employment support for other individuals with health conditions and disabilities.

Keywords

Individual Placement and SupportIPSfidelity scaledisability employment gapwork and health
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 517 - 533
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bond, G., Becker, D., Drake, R. and Vogler, K. (1997) ‘A fidelity scale for the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment’, Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin, 40, 4, 265–84.Google Scholar
Bond, G., Campbell, K., Evans, L., Gervey, R., Pascaris, A., Tice, S., Del Bene, D. and Revell, G (2002) ‘A scale to measure quality of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 17, 239–50.Google Scholar
Bond, G., Drake, R. and Becker, D. (2008) ‘An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment’, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 4, 280–90.Google Scholar
Bond, G., Becker, D. and Drake, R. (2011) ‘Measurement of fidelity of implementation of evidence-based practices: case example of the IPS fidelity scale’, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 18, 126–41.Google Scholar
Bond, G., Drake, R. and Becker, D. (2012a) ‘Generalizability of the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment outside the US’, World Psychiatry, 11, 1, 32–9.Google Scholar
Bond, G., Peterson, A., Becker, D. and Drake, R. (2012b) ‘Validation of the Individual Placement and Support fidelity scale (IPS-25)’, Psychiatric Services, 63, 8, 758–63.Google Scholar
Burns, T. and Catty, J. (2008) ‘IPS in Europe: the EQOLISE trial’, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 4, 313–7.Google Scholar
Burns, T., Yeeles, K., Langford, O., Vazquez Montes, A. and Burgess, J. (2015) ‘A randomised controlled trial of time-limited individual placement and support: IPS-LITE trial’, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 207, 351–6.Google Scholar
Campbell, K., Bond, G. and Drake, R. (2010) ‘Client predictors of employment outcomes in high-fidelity supported employment’, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198, 8, 556– 63.Google Scholar
Centre for Mental Health (CMH) (2015) The IPS Fidelity Scale, https://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/ips-fidelity-scale [accessed 16.10.2018].Google Scholar
Considine, M., Lewis, J., O'Sullivan, S. and Sol, E. (2015) Getting Welfare to Work: Street-Level Governance in Australia, the UK and the Netherlands, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coole, C., Drummond, A. and Watson, P. (2012) ‘Individual work support for employed patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled pilot trial’, Clinical Rehabilitation, 27, 1, 40–50.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions-Department of Health (DWP-DH) (2016) Work, Health and Disability Green Paper Data Pack, Technical Annex, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/644090/work-health-and-disability-green-paper-data-pack.pdf [accessed 24.01.2017].Google Scholar
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. and White, M. (2008) ‘Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.Google Scholar
Eleveld, A. (2017) ‘Activation policies: policies of social inclusion or social exclusion?’, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 25, 3, 277–85.Google Scholar
Ellison, M., Klodnick, V., Bond, G., Krzos, I., Kaiser, S., Fagan, M. and Davis, M. (2015) ’Adapting supported employment for emerging adults with serious mental health conditions’, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 42, 2, 206–22.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2018) Disability Statistics – Employment Patterns http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Disability_statistics_-_employment_patterns [accessed 08.08.2018].Google Scholar
Ferguson, K., Xie, B. and Glynn, S. (2012) ‘Adapting the individual placement and support model with homeless young adults’, Child Youth Care Forum, 41, 277–94.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. and Wright, S. (2017) ‘A hand up or a slap down? Criminalising benefit claimants in Britain via strategies of surveillance, sanctions and deterrence’, Critical Social Policy, doi: 10.1177/0261018317726622.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Bond, G., Becker, D., Swanson, S. and Langfitt-Reese, S. (2015) ‘Predictive validity of the Individual Placement and Support fidelity scale (IPS-25): a replication study’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43, 209–16.Google Scholar
Li-Tsang, C., Li, E., Lam, C., Hui, K. and Chan, C. (2008) ‘The effect of a job placement and support program for workers with musculoskeletal injuries: a randomized control trial (RCT) study’, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18, 3, 299–306.Google Scholar
Lockett, H., Waghorn, G., Kydd, R. and Chant, D. (2016) ‘Predictive validity of evidence-based practices in supported employment: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Mental Health Review Journal, 21, 4, 261–81.Google Scholar
Luciano, A., Drake, R., Bond, G., Becker, D., Carpenter-Song, E., Lord, S., Swarbrick, P. and Swanson, S (2014) ‘Evidence-based supported employment for people with severe mental illness: past, current, and future research’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40, 1–13.Google Scholar
Margolies, P., Humensky, J., Chiang, I., Covell, N., Broadway-Wilson, K., Gregory, R., Jewell, T., Scannevin, G., Baker, S. and Dixon, L. (2017) ‘Is there a role for fidelity self-assessment in the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment?’, Psychiatric Services, 68, 9, 975–8.Google Scholar
Margolies, P., Humensky, J., Chiang, I., Covell, N., Jewell, T., Broadway-Wilson, K., Gregory, R., Scannevin, G. and Dixon, L. (2018) ‘Relationship between self-assessed fidelity and self-reported employment in the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment’, Psychiatric Services, 69, 5, 609–12.Google Scholar
Marshall, T., Goldberg, R., Braude, L., Dougherty, R., Daniels, A., Shom Ghose, S., George, P. and Delphin-Rittmon, M. (2014) ‘Supported employment: assessing the evidence, Psychiatric Services, 65, 1, 16–23.Google Scholar
McGrew, J. and Griss, M. (2005) ‘Concurrent and predictive validity of two scales to assess the fidelity of implementation of supported employment’, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 29, 1, 41–7.Google Scholar
McGurk, S., Twamley, E., Sitzer, D, McHugo, G. and Muser, K. (2007) ‘A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia’, American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1791–802.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J., Drake, R. and Bond, G. (2018) ‘Economic, labor and regulatory moderators of the effect of Individual Placement and Support among people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44, 1, 22–31.Google Scholar
Modini, M., Tan, L., Brinchmann, B., Wang, M. J., Killackey, E., Glozier, N., Mykletun, A. and Harvey, S. (2016) ‘Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of the international evidence’, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 209, 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
Mowbray, C., Holter, M., Teague, G. and Bybee, D. (2003) ‘Fidelity criteria: development, measurement, and validation’, American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 3, 315–40.Google Scholar
Mueser, K., Drake, R. and Bond, G. (2016) ‘Recent advances in supported employment for people with serious mental illness’, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 29, 196–201.Google Scholar
OECD (2015) Fit Mind, Fit Job: From Evidence to Practice in Mental Health and Work, Mental Health and Work, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Oguz, S., Merad, S. and Snape, D. (2013) Measuring National Well-Being – What Matters Most to Personal Well-Being?, London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
Paulson, R., Post, R., Herinckx, H. and Risser, P. (2002) ‘Beyond components: using fidelity scales to measure and assure choice in program implementation and quality assurance’, Community Mental Health Journal, 38, 2, 119–28.Google Scholar
Poremski, D., Rabouin, D. and Latimer, E. (2017) ‘A randomised controlled trial of evidence based supported employment for people who have recently been homeless and have a mental illness’, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 44, 217–24.Google Scholar
Smith, D., Atmatzidis, K., Capogreco, M., Lloyd-Randolfi, D. and Seman, V. (2017) ‘Evidence-based interventions for increasing work participation for persons with various disabilities: A systematic review’, OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 37, 25, 3S–13S.Google Scholar
Suijkerbuijk, Y., Schaafsma, F., van Mechelen, J., Ojajarvi, A., Corbiere, M. and Anema, J. (2017) ‘Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, 9, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011867.pub2.Google Scholar
Sveinsdottir, V., Løvvik, C., Fyhn, T., Monstad, K., Ludvigsen, K., Øverland, S. and Reme, S. (2014) ‘Protocol for the effect evaluation of Individual Placement and Support (IPS): a randomized controlled multicenter trial of IPS versus treatment as usual for patients with moderate to severe mental illness in Norway’, BMC Psychiatry, 14: 307.Google Scholar
van Stolk, C., Hofman, J., Hafner, M. and Janta, B. (2014) Psychological Wellbeing and Work: Improving Service Provision and Outcomes, London: Department for Work and Pensions and Department of Health, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/273433/psychological-wellbeing-and-work.pdf [accessed 12.03.2017].Google Scholar
Waddell, G. and Burton, K. (2006) Is Work Good for your Health and Wellbeing? An Independent Review, London: The Stationery Office, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214326/hwwb-is-work-good-for-you.pdf [accessed 22.05.2017].Google Scholar
Work and Pensions Select Committee (WPSC) (2016) The Future of Jobcentre Plus: Second Report of Session 2016–17, HC57, London: House of Commons, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmworpen/57/5702.htm [accessed 04.02.2017].Google Scholar
Work and Pensions Select Committee (WPSC) (2017) Disability Employment Gap: Seventh Report of Session 2016–17, HC56, London: House of Commons, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmworpen/56/56.pdf [accessed 16.03.2017].Google Scholar