Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:03:53.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: European Social Policy and Society after Brexit: Neoliberalism, Populism, and Social Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2018

Steve Corbett  and
Alan Walker
Steve Corbett
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Liverpool Hope University E-mail: [email protected]
Alan Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The narrow referendum decision for British exit from the European Union (Brexit), and its explosive political consequences, has become a lens through which decades-long tensions in European society can be viewed. The result, which was expected to be a clear Remain victory, has been interpreted as various combinations of: the unleashing of xenophobic and racist anti-immigrant sentiment; a kick back against disinterested elites by ‘left behind’ people; the fermenting of nationalist populism by political and media actors; a clash of cultural values; a rejection of ‘market is all’ globalisation in favour of national borders; or as a reaction against austerity, inequality and insecurity (Corbett, 2016; Goodwin and Heath, 2016; Hobolt, 2016; Inglehart and Norris, 2016; Kaufmann, 2016; Pettifor, 2016; Room, 2016; Seidler, 2018; Taylor-Gooby, 2017). This British-made shock has parallels in and consequences for wider European society. In the Referendum, the EU became an emblematic representation of the distrusted, remote, technocratic elites, who are said to be responsible for an unbelievably large number of societal ills. Meanwhile across Europe there are varieties of Eurosceptic populism and distrust of elites on both the right and left (Ivaldi et al., 2017).

Type
Themed Section: European Social Policy and Society after Brexit: Neoliberalism, Populism, and Social Quality
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 87 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abts, K. and Rummens, S. (2007) ‘Populism versus democracy’, Political Studies, 55, 2, 405–24.Google Scholar
Corbett, S. (2016) ‘The Social consequences of Brexit for the UK and Europe’, International Journal of Social Quality, 6, 1, 11–31.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (2017) ‘Progressive neoliberalism versus reactionary populism: a Hobson's choice’, in Geiselberger, H. (ed.), The Great Regression, Cambridge: Polity, 40–8.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. and Heath, O. (2016) ‘Brexit vote explained: poverty, low skills and lack of opportunities’, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 31 August, https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/brexit-vote-explained-poverty-low-skills-and-lack-opportunities [accessed 09.08.2018].Google Scholar
Hobolt, S. B. (2016) ‘The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 9, 1259–77.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F. and Norris, P. (2016) ‘Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash’, Faculty Research Working Paper Series: RWP16-026, Harvard University, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2818659 [accessed 22.08.2018].Google Scholar
Ivaldi, G., Lanzone, M. E. and Woods, D. (2017) ‘Varieties of populism across a left-right spectrum: the case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos, and Five Star Movement’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 4, 354–76.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, E. (2016) ‘It's NOT the economy, stupid: Brexit as a story of personal values’, LSE British Politics and Policy Blog, 7 July, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/personal-values-brexit-vote/ [accessed 09.08.2018].Google Scholar
Müller, J-W. (2016) What is Populism?, Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Pettifor, A. (2016) ‘Brexit and its consequences’, Globalizations, 14, 1, 127–32.Google Scholar
Room, G. (2016) ‘After the referendum: picking up the bits’, IPR Blog, 4th July, University of Bath, http://blogs.bath.ac.uk/iprblog/2016/07/04/after-the-referendum-picking-up-the-bits-by-professor-graham-room/ [accessed 09.08.2018].Google Scholar
Seidler, V. (2018) Making Sense of Brexit, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, B. (2008) ‘The thin ideology of populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 1, 95–110.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. (2004) ‘Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9, 3, 269–88.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2017) ‘Re-doubling the crisis of the welfare state: the impact of Brexit on UK welfare state politics’, Journal of Social Policy, 46, 4, 815–35.Google Scholar