Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T01:14:21.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interagency Working to Support the Health of People Who Are Homeless

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Louise Joly ,
Claire Goodman ,
Katherine Froggatt  and
Vari Drennan
Louise Joly
Affiliation:
Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London E-mail: [email protected]
Claire Goodman
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire E-mail: [email protected]
Katherine Froggatt
Affiliation:
School of Health and Medicine, University of Lancaster E-mail: [email protected]
Vari Drennan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, St. George's, University of London & Kingston University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interagency working is a recurrent theme in homelessness policy literature, but is ill defined and rarely addressed in UK homelessness research. This article draws on findings from a study that explored how interagency working is achieved between statutory and voluntary sector services concerned with improving the health of people experiencing homelessness. We argue that a focus on the health needs and behaviours perceived as being a risk to the general population directly influences interagency working and how professional networks organise themselves. The findings are discussed with reference to the impact of social policy on the health of people who are homeless.

Type
Themed Section on Exploring Multiple Exclusion Homelessness
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 523 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Six, P., Goodwin, N., Peck, E. and Freeman, T. (2006), ‘An integrated theory of networks’, in P. 6, Goodwin, N., Peck, E. and Freeman, T. (eds.), Managing Networks of Twenty-First Century Organisations, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Alcohol Concern (2003), Alcohol and Men, London: Alcohol Concern.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1998), ‘Politics of risk society’, in Franklin, J. (ed.), The Politics of Risk Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bond, J., Cartlidge, A., Gregson, B., Barton, A. G., Philips, P. R., Armitage, P., Brown, A. M. and Reedy, B. L. E. C. (1987), ‘Interprofessional collaboration in primary care’, Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 37, April,158–61.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office Social Exclusion Task Force (2007), Reaching Out: Progress on Social Exclusion, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Craig, T., Baylis, E., Klein, O., Manning, P. and Reader, L. (1995), The Homeless Mentally Ill Initiative – an Evaluation of Four Teams, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Crane, M. and Warnes, A. M. (2001), ‘Primary health care services for single homeless people: defects and opportunities’, Family Practice, 8, 3, 272–6.Google Scholar
Crane, M. and Warnes, A. M. (2007), ‘The outcomes of rehousing older homeless people: a longitudinal study’, Ageing and Society, 27, 6, 891–918.Google Scholar
Croft-White, C. and Rayner, G. (1999), London Health Strategy Rapid Review of Health and Homelessness, London: NHS Executive.Google Scholar
Curran, C. I. and Flannigan, C. E. (1997), ‘Belfast's single homeless healthcare project’, Health Summary, 14, 12, 11–13.Google Scholar
Daiski, I. (2006), ‘Perspectives of homeless people on their health and health needs priorities’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58, 3, 273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (1976), Letter to Michael Meacher MP Parliamentary Secretary Department of Health and Social Security, CHAR, London.Google Scholar
Department of Communities and Local Government (2006), Strong and Prosperous Communities – The Local Government White Paper (Vol. II), London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2005), National Health Service Act 1977 Alternative Provider Medical Services (No. 2) Directions 2005, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Fopp, R. (2002), ‘Increasing the potential for gaze, surveillance and normalisation: the transformation of an Australian policy for people who are homeless’, Surveillance and Society, 1, 1, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Jones, S., Reilly, S. and Gaulton, E. (2004), ‘Tackling the needs of the homeless: a controlled trial of health advocacy’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 12, 3, 221–32.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973), ‘The strength of weak ties’, The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6, 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregson, B. A., Cartlidge, A. M. and Bond, J. (1992), ‘Development of a measure of professional collaboration in primary health care’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 46, 1, 48–53.Google Scholar
Homeless Link (2010), Improving Homeless Londoners’ Mental Health, http://www.homeless.org.uk/mental-health-London [accessed 01.11.2010].Google Scholar
Homeless Link Cymru (2005), Recommendations on the Development of Homelessness and Healthcare Policy in Wales, Wales: Homeless Link Cymru.Google Scholar
Homelessness Directorate (2003a), Homelessness and Health Information Sheet – Number 1 – Personal Medical Services, London: ODPM.Google Scholar
Homelessness Directorate (2003b), The Homelessness Act 2002, London: ODPMGoogle Scholar
Home Office Statistical Bulletin – Crime in England and Wales 2005/6, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office (2008), A Guide to Antisocial Behaviour Tools and Powers, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Hough, J. and Rice, B. (2010), Providing Personalised Support to Rough Sleepers: An Evaluation of the City of London Pilot, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Johnsen, S., Cloke, P. and May, J. (2005), ‘Day centres for homeless people: spaces of care or fear?’, Social and Cultural Geography, 6, 6, 787–811.Google Scholar
Johnsen, S. and Fitzpatrick, S. (2010), ‘Revanchist sanitisation or coercive care? The use of enforcement to combat begging, street drinking and rough sleeping in England’, Urban Studies, 47, 8, 1703–23.Google Scholar
Judge, C. and Sarangi, J. (2003), ‘Evidence-based management of an outbreak of hepatitis A among intravenous drug users, the homeless and hostel dwellers’, British Journal of Infection Control, 4, 3, 18–21.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (1988), The Action Research Planner, Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., Lynch, E. and Goodlad, R. (2001), Good Practice in Joint Multi-Agency Working on Homelessness, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
Kumar, D., Citron, K. M., Leese, J. and Watson, J. M. (1995), ‘Tuberculosis among the homeless at a temporary shelter in London: report of a chest x-ray screening programme’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 49, 6, 629–33.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. M. (1950), ‘Inter-agency teamwork for tuberculosis control’, Public Health Nursing, 42, 8, 453–7.Google Scholar
Maclean, U. and Naumann, L. (1979), ‘Primary medical care for the single homeless: the Edinburgh experiment’, Health Bulletin, 37, 1, 6–10.Google Scholar
Medical Campaign Project (1988), The Medical Campaign Project: Campaign for Improved Access to Health Care for Single Homeless People – Final Report, London: Medical Campaign Project.Google Scholar
Millie, A., Jacobson, J., Hough, M. and Paraskevopoulou, A. (2005), Anti Social Behaviour in London: Setting the Context for the London Antisocial Behaviour Strategy, London: Greater London Authority.Google Scholar
Neale, J. (2008), ‘Homelessness, drug use and Hepatitis C: a complex problem explored within the context of social exclusion’, International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 6, 429–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newburn, T. and Rock, P. (2005), Living in Fear: Violence and Victimisation in the Lives of Single Homeless People, London: Crisis.Google Scholar
Pannell, J. and Parry, S. (1999), ‘Implementing “joined-up thinking”: multiagency services for single homeless people in Bristol’, in Kennett, P. and Marsh, A. (eds.), Homelessness, Exploring the New Terrain, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Powell, P. V. (1987), ‘A “house doctor” scheme for primary health care for the single homeless in Edinburgh’, Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, October, 444–7.Google Scholar
Powell, P. V. (1988a), ‘Primary health care for the single homeless’, British Medical Journal, 297, 84–5.Google Scholar
Powell, P. V. (1988b), ‘Qualitative assessment in the evaluation of the Edinburgh primary health care scheme for single homeless hostel dwellers’, Community Medicine, 10, 3, 185–96.Google Scholar
Ramsden, S. S., Nyiri, P., Bridgewater, J. and El Kabir, D. J. (1989), ‘A mobile surgery for single homeless people in London’, British Medical Journal, 298, 372–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, S., Graham-Jones, S., Gaulton, E. and Davidson, E. (2004), ‘Can a health advocate for homeless families reduce workload for the primary healthcare team? A controlled trial’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 12, 1, 63–74.Google Scholar
Riley, A., Harding, G., Underwood, M. R. and Carter, Y. H. (2003), ‘Homelessness: a problem for primary care?’, British Journal of General Practice, June, 473–9.Google Scholar
Royal College of General Practitioners (2002), ‘RCGP statement on homelessness and primary care’, http://www.rcgp.org.uk/default.aspx?page=2262 [accessed 01.11.2010].Google Scholar
RSA (2007), ‘Drugs – facing facts: the report of the RSA commission on illegal drugs, communities and public policy (executive summary)’, RSA, London.Google Scholar
Scott, R., Gaskell, P. G. and Morrell, D. C. (1966), ‘Patients who reside in common lodging houses’, British Medical Journal, 2, 1561–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R., Mose, E. and Murphy, M. (1975), Primary Medicine for the Homeless: An Experiment in Primary Medical Care for Single Homeless People at the St George's Men's Care Unit of the Methodist East End Mission, London: CHAR.Google Scholar
Southern, A., Premarante, N., English, M., Balazs, J. and O'Sullivan, D. (1999), ‘Tuberculosis among homeless people in London: an effective model of screening and treatment’, International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 3, 11, 1001–8.Google Scholar
Syed, N. A., Hearing, S. D., Shaw, I. S., Probert, C. S. J., Brooklyn, T. N., Caul, E. O., Barry, R. E. and Sarangi, J. (2003), ‘Outbreak of hepatitis A in the injecting drug user and homeless populations in Bristol: control by a targeted vaccination programme and possible parenteral transmission’, European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 15, 8, 901–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wales Audit Office (2007), A Review of the Effectiveness of the National Homelessness Strategy, Cardiff: Wales Audit Office.Google Scholar
Walker, A., Kershaw, C. and Nicholas, S. (2006), Crime in England and Wales 2005/06. Home Office Statistical Bulletin, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Warnes, A. M., Crane, M., Whitehead, N. and Fu, R. (2003), Homeless Fact File, London: Crisis.Google Scholar
West, E. L., Gadkowski, L. B., Østbye, T., Piedrahita, C. and Stout, J. E. (2008), ‘Tuberculosis knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among North Carolinians at increased risk of infection’, North Carolina Medical Journal, 69, 1, 14–20.Google Scholar
Wood, A., Sclare, P. and Love, J. (2001), ‘Service innovations: a service for the homeless with mental illness in Aberdeen’, Psychiatric Bulletin, 25, 137–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar