Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:50:59.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food Insecurity in German households: Qualitative and Quantitative Data on Coping, Poverty Consumerism and Alimentary Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2015

Sabine Pfeiffer ,
Tobias Ritter  and
Elke Oestreicher
Sabine Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
Department for Sociology, University of Hohenheim E-mail: [email protected]
Tobias Ritter
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Science Research, ISF Munich E-mail: [email protected]
Elke Oestreicher
Affiliation:
Department for Sociology, University of Hohenheim E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides empirical results on food consumption patterns of German low-income households and those living under conditions of welfare as defined by Social Code II (Sozialgesetzbuch II). We focus on nutritional consumption patterns, strategies of food choices and typologies of coping with alimentary exclusion in Germany. Quantitative data from SILC/Eurostat are examined alongside qualitative data derived from a longitudinal study composed of more than 450 biographical interviews, conducted over a period of five years. The quantitative data reveal that food poverty and alimentary participation in German households is severe compared to the European average, the UK and even to Greece. The qualitative data give insight into a broad variety of individual coping strategies, eliciting evidence of the essential role of alimentary participation, as well as its tight restrictions.

Keywords

Hungernutritional povertyfood insecurityalimentary participationpovertyconsumerismGermany
Type
Themed Section on Hunger, Food and Social Policy in Austerity
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 483 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caraher, M. and Dowler, E. (2014) ‘Food for poorer people: conventional and “alternative” transgressions’, in Goodman, M. and Sage, C. (eds.), Food Transgressions: Making Sense of Contemporary Food Politics, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 227–46.Google Scholar
Cooper, N., Purcell, S. and Jackson, R. (2014) Below the Breadline: The Relentless Rise of Food Poverty in Britain, Manchester, Oxford, Salisbury: Church Action on Poverty, Oxfam, TrusselTrust.Google Scholar
Dowler, E. and O'Connor, D. (2012) ‘Rights based approaches to addressing food poverty and food insecurity in Ireland and UK’, Social Science and Medicine, 74, 1, 44–51.Google Scholar
Gannon, M. and Bailey, N. (2014) ‘Attitudes to the “necessities of life”: would an independent scotland set a different poverty standard to the rest of the UK?’, Social Policy and Society, 13, 3, 321–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt-Gilménez, E., Shattuck, A., Altieri, M., Herren, H. and Gliessman, S. (2012) ‘We already grow enough food for 10 billion people . . . and still can't end hunger’, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 36, 6, 595–8.Google Scholar
Kaitila, V. (2014) ‘Transnational income convergence and national income disparity: Europe, 1960–2012’, Journal of Economic Integration, 29, 2, 343–71.Google Scholar
Max Rubner-Institut (2008) Nationale Verzehrstudie II – Ergebnisbericht, Teil 2, Karlsruhe: BundesforschungsinstitutfürErnährungund Lebensmittel.Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2000) ‘Qualitative content analysis’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2, Art. 20, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204.Google Scholar
OECD (2011) Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising, Country Note Germany, Paris: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/germany/49177659.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD (2012) Terms of Reference, OECD Project on the Distribution of Household Incomes, Paris: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/IDD-ToR.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD (2014) Society at a Glance, OECD Social Indicators, Paris: OECD, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/soc_glance-2014-en.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, S., Ritter, T. and Hirseland, A. (2011) ‘Hunger and nutritional poverty in Germany: quantiative and qualitative empirical insights’, Critical Public Health, 21, 4, 417–28.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, G. (2004) ‘Biographical research’, in Seale, C., Giampieto, G., Gubrium, J. F. and Silverman, D. (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage, pp. 48–64.Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt (2013) Datenreport 2013: Ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Wiesbaden: Destatis.Google Scholar
Tosun, J., Wetzel, A. and Zapryanova, G. (2014) ‘The EU in crisis: advancing the debate’, Journal of European Integration, 36, 3, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withbeck, L., Xiaojin, Ch. and Johnson, K. (2006) ‘Food insecurity among homeless and runaway adolescents’, Public Health Nutrition, 9, 1, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar