Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:23:28.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic and Political Inclusion in Human Development Conditional Income Transfer Programmes in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2016

Armando Barrientos  and
Juan M. Villa
Armando Barrientos
Affiliation:
Professor of Poverty and Social Justice at the Global Development Institute, The University of Manchester, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Juan M. Villa
Affiliation:
Research Fellow at the Global Development Institute, The University of Manchester, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most countries in Latin America have implemented human development conditional income transfer programmes to address intergenerational persistence of poverty. Typically, these programmes provide income transfers to households in poverty, conditional on children attending school and on household members attending health clinics. Evaluations have established that programmes reach their explicit short- and medium-term objectives, especially as regards nutrition, children's schooling and improved health care utilisation. It is too early to say whether they will be successful in reducing the intergenerational persistence of poverty. Crucially, this will depend on whether they contribute to the economic and political inclusion of groups in poverty. This article reviews the available literature and finds that participation in human development conditional income transfer programmes leads to improvements in productive capacity, but that favourable labour market conditions will be needed to guarantee economic inclusion. Improved political participation associated with programme participation raises the prospects for greater political inclusion.

Keywords

Conditional Cash TransfersCCTLatin Americapovertyeconomic inclusionpolitical inclusion
Type
Themed Section on Assessing the Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin American Societies in the Early Twenty-First Century
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 421 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alzúa, M. L., Cruces, G. and Ripani, L. (2010) Welfare Programs and Labour Supply in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence for Latin America, CEDLAS-UNLP.Google Scholar
Attanasio, O. and Di Maro, V. (2005) ‘Efectos de mediano plazo del Programa Oportunidades sobre el consumo en áreas rurales’, in Hernández, B. and Hernández, M. (eds), Evaluación Externa de Impacto del Programa Oportunidades 2004: Aspectos Económicos y Sociales, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, pp. 17–52.Google Scholar
Baez, J. E. and Camacho, A. (2011) Assessing the Long-Term Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers on Human Capital: Evidence from Colombia, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Baez, J. E., Camacho, A., Conover, E. and Zárate, R. A. (2012) Conditional Cash Transfers, Political Participation, and Voting Behavior, Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barham, T., Macours, K. and Maluccio, J. A. (2013) More Schooling and More Learning? Effects of a Three-Year Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Nicaragua after 10 Years, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2009) ‘Labour markets and the (hyphenated) welfare regime in Latin America’, Economy and Society, 38, 1, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2013a) Social Assistance in Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2013b) ‘The rise of social assistance in Brazil’, Development and Change, 44, 44, 4.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2014) ‘On the distributional implications of social protection reforms in Latin America’, in Cornia, G. A. (ed.), Falling Inequality in Latin America: Policy Changes and Lessons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. and Villa, J. M. (2015) ‘Antipoverty transfers and labour force participation effects’, Journal of Development Studies, 51, 9, 1224–40Google Scholar
Behrman, J. R., Cheng, Y. and Todd, P. (2004) ‘Evaluating pre-school programs when length of exposure to the program varies: a non-parametric approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 1, 108–32.Google Scholar
Bohn, S. (2011) ‘Social policy and vote in Brazil: Bolsa Família and the shifts in Lula's electoral base’, Latin American Research Review, 46, 1, 54–79.Google Scholar
Borges Sugiyama, N. (2011) ‘The difussion of conditional cash transfer programs in the Americas’, Global Social Policy, 11, 2210;3, 250–78.Google Scholar
Britto, T. and Soares, F. V. (2011) ‘Bolsa Família and the citizen's basic income: a misstep?’, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth Working Paper 77, United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
Carnes, M. and Mares, I. (2010) Deindustrialization and the Rise of Non-Contributory Social Programs in Latin America, Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Cecchini, S. and Madariaga, A. (2011) Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes: The Recent Experience in Latin America and the Caribbean, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Chile: United Nations.Google Scholar
Cecchini, S. and Martínez, R. (2011) Protección social inclusiva en América Latina: Una mirada integral, un enfoque de derechos, Santiago: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Chen, S. and Ravallion, M. (2012) More Relatively Poor People in a Less Absolutely Poor World, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Coady, D. and Parker, S. (2009) Targeting Social Transfers to the Poor in Mexico, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Cutler, D. M., Knaul, F., Lozano, R., Méndez, O. and Zurita, B. (2000) Financial Crisis, Health Outcomes and Aging: Mexico in the 1980s and 1990s, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
De Janvry, A., Finan, F. and Sadoulet, E. (2010) Local Electoral Incentives and Decentralized Program Performance, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la O, A. L. (2013) ‘Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behaviour? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico’, American Journal of Political Science, 57, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Econometría (2012). ‘Impactos de Largo Plazo del Programa Familias en Acción en Municipios de Menos de 100 mil Habitantes en los Aspectos Claves del Desarrollo del Capital Humano (Informe final)’, DPS-DNP.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. H. G. and Robalino, D. (2010) Social Protection in Latin America: Achievements and limitations, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Fiszbein, A. and Schady, N. (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Freije, S. and Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (2012) Long Term Impact of a Cash-Transfer Program on Labor Outcomes of the Rural Youth in Mexico, Center for International Development at Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
Fried, B. J. (2012) ‘Distributive politics and conditional cash transfers: the case of Brazil's Bolsa Família’, World Development, 40, 5, 1042–53.Google Scholar
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S. W. and Rubio-Codina, M. (2012) ‘Investing cash transfers to raise long-term living standards’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 1, 164–92.Google Scholar
Giovagnoli, P. (2005) Poverty Alleviation or Political Networking? A Combined Qual-Quant Analysis of the Implementation of Safety Nets in Post Crisis Argentina, London: Development Studies Institute, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
González de la Rocha, M. and Escobar, A. L. (2012) Pobreza, transferencias condicionadas y sociedad, Mexico City: CIESAS.Google Scholar
Hall, A. (2008) ‘Brazil's Bolsa Família: a double-edged sword?’, Development and Change, 39, 5, 799–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccoud, L., Hadjab, P. D. E.-M. and Chaibub, J. R. (2010) The Consolidation of Social Assistance in Brazil and Its Challenges, 1988–;2008, London: International Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Linos, E. (2013) ‘Do conditional cash transfer programmes shift votes? Evidence from the Honduran PRAF’, Electoral Studies, 32, 4, 864–74.Google Scholar
Mahon, J. E. (2009) ‘Can new social programs bring about a new period of political incorporation in Latin America?’, Mimeo, Williams College, Williamstown, MA.Google Scholar
Manacorda, M., Miguel, E. and Vigorito, A. (2011) ‘Government transfers and political support’, Amercan Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 1–28.Google Scholar
MIDEPLAN (2009) Fundamentos para la Operación de un Sistema Intersectorial de Protección Social, Secretaría Ejecutiva del Sistema de Protección Social.Google Scholar
Nino-Zarazua, M. (2011) Mexico's Progresa-Oportunidades and the Emergence of Social Assistance in Latin America, BWPI, The University of Manchester, http://ideas.repec.org/p/bwp/bwppap/14211.html [accessed10.07.2014].Google Scholar
Nupia, O. (2011) Anti-Poverty Programs and Presidential Election Outcomes: Familias en Acciòn in Colombia, Universidad de los Andes Facultad de Economìa.Google Scholar
Paes-Sousa, R., Regalia, F. and Stampini, M. (2013). Conditions for Success in Implementing CCT Programs: Lessons for Asia from Latin America, Policy Brief No. IDB-PB-192, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993) ‘When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change’, World Politics, 45, 4, 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoufias, E. (2005) Progresa and Its Impacts on the Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, L. (2012) Jai Ho? The Impact of a Large Public Works Programme on the Government's Election Performance in India, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. (2008) ‘The president's “new” constituency: Lula and the pragmatic vote in Brazil's 2006 presidential elections’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 40, 29–49.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. and Power, T. (2013) ‘Bolsa Família and the shift in Lula's electoral base, 2002–2006: a reply to Bohn’, Latin American Research Review, 48, 2, 3–24.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. (2014). ‘Conditionality and support for redistributive transfers: results from observational and survey-experimental studies’, Mimeo, FGV, Sao Paulo.Google Scholar