Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:09:25.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disciplining Difference – Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2009

Judy Nixon
Affiliation:
Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research (CRESR), Sheffield Hallam University E-mail: [email protected]
David Prior
Affiliation:

Extract

Addressing anti-social behaviour (ASB) has been a major policy priority of New Labour since it came to power in 1997. This is reflected in a series of legislative powers enabling a range of agencies to take legal action to tackle ASB (e.g. Crime and Disorder Act 1998; Police Reform Act 2002; Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003; Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005) and in a number of national policy initiatives (e.g. the Home Office ‘Together’ Campaign, 2003; the Respect Action Plan, 2006; the Youth Task Force Action Plan, 2007). These developments are the subject of a growing body of academic analysis and critique, much of which has focused on the use of the ASB powers in the regulation of particular neighbourhoods and communities, especially social housing areas of predominantly White working-class residents (Burney, 2005; Flint, 2006), and of young people, again mostly White and working class (Squires and Stephen, 2005). Specific service or practice developments arising out of ASB policy have also been analysed, for example, Family Intervention Projects (Nixon et al., 2006, 2008), Anti-Social Behaviour Teams (Prior et al., 2006), and the use of ASBOs (Squires, 2006; Matthews et al., 2007) and Dispersal Orders (Crawford and Lister, 2007).

Type
Themed section on Disciplining Difference
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burney, E. (2005), Making People Behave: Anti-Social Behaviour Politics and Policies, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Carr, H. (2007), ‘Locating gender in the discourse of anti-social behaviour’, in Lim, H. and Bottomley, A. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Land Law, London: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (1985), Visions of Social Control, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. and Lister, S. (2007), The Use and Impact of Dispersal Orders, Bristol: Policy Press/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Flint, J. (ed.) (2006), Housing, Urban Governance and Anti-Social Behaviour, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Flint, J. (2009), ‘Subversive subjects and conditional, earned and denied citizenship’, in Barnes, M. and Prior, D. (eds.), Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Holt, A. (2008), ‘Room for resistance? Parenting orders, disciplinary powers and the production of the “bad parent”’, in Squires, P. (ed.), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, C. and Nixon, J. (2001), ‘Taking the blame and losing the home: women and anti-social behaviour’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 23, 4, 395410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isal, S. (2006), Equal Respect? ASBOs and Race Equality, London: The Runnymede Trust.Google Scholar
Jacobs, K., Kemeny, J. and Manzi, T. (2003), ‘Power, discursive space and institutional practices in the construction of housing problems’, Housing Studies, 18, 4, 429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R., Easton, H., Briggs, D. and Pease, K. (2007), Assessing the Use and Impact of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, J. and Hunter, C. (2009), ‘Disciplining women and the governance of conduct’, in Millie, A. (ed.), Securing Respect: Behavioural Expectations and Anti-Social Behaviour in the UK, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, J., Hunter, C., Parr, S., Whittle, S., Myers, S. and Sanderson, D. (2006), ASB Intensive Family Support Projects: An Evaluation of 6 Pioneering Projects, London: DCLG.Google Scholar
Nixon, J. and Parr, S. (2006), ‘Anti-social behaviour: voices from the front line’, in Flint, J. (ed.), Housing, Urban Governance and Anti-social Behaviour: Perspectives, Policy and Practice, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, J., Parr, S. and Sanderson, D. (2008), The Longer-Term Outcomes for Families Who Have Worked with Intensive Family Support Projects, London: DCLG.Google Scholar
Parr, S. and Nixon, J. (2008), ‘Rationalising family intervention projects’, in Squires, P. (ed.), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Bristol: Policy Press, pp.161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, D. (2007), Continuities and Discontinuities in Governing Anti-social Behaviour, Birmingham: Institute of Applied Social Studies, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Prior, D. (2009), ‘The “problem” of anti-social behaviour and the policy knowledge base: analyzing the power/knowledge relationship’, Critical Social Policy, 29, 1, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, D., Farrow, K. and Paris, A. (2006), ‘Beyond ASBOs? Evaluating the outcomes of anti-social behaviour initiatives – early findings from a case study in one English city’,Local Government Studies, 32, 1, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, D. and Spalek, B. (2008), ‘Anti-social behaviour and minority ethnic populations’, in Squires, P. (ed.), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Bristol: Policy Press, pp.117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Accounts Committee (2007), Tackling Anti-social Behaviour: Forty-fourth Report of Session 2006–7, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Squires, P. (2006), ‘New Labour and the politics of antisocial behaviour’, Critical Social Policy, 26, 1, 144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, P. (ed.) (2008), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Squires, P. and Stephen, D. (2005), Rougher Justice: Anti-Social Behaviour and Young People, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar