Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:01:00.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Co-production and Sure Start Children's Centres: Reflecting upon Users', Perspectives and Implications for Service Delivery, Planning and Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Simon Pemberton  and
Jennifer Mason
Simon Pemberton
Affiliation:
Merseyside Social Inclusion Observatory, Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool E-mail: [email protected]
Jennifer Mason
Affiliation:
Merseyside Social Inclusion Observatory, Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the UK, there has been a re-awakening of interest in the ‘co-production’ approach to involve service users in modernised public services. Within this context, Sure Start Children's Centres are being created to address child poverty and social exclusion, with an emphasis on participatory approaches. This paper considers the engagement of users in service delivery, service planning and in monitoring and evaluation activities for Children's Centres in Greater Merseyside. Research findings indicate that a lack of time to implement (and develop trust within) the new arrangements, a lack of awareness by users to participate and a broader thematic (employment and education) and geographical remit for Children's Centres is impacting upon the greater involvement of users in all aspects of co-production. Without such participation it is concluded that there is a real risk that the current needs of those most disadvantaged will not be adequately addressed.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 13 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anning, A., Stuart, J., Nicholls, M., Goldthorpe, J., and Morley, A. (2007), Understanding Variations in Effectiveness among Sure Start Local Programmes, NESS Report 024, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Barnett, N. (2002), ‘Including ourselves: New Labour and engagement with public service’, Management Decision, 40, 4, 310–17.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. (2007), ‘Family support in children's centres (summary): research and policy for the real world’, Family and Parenting Institute, at http://www.familyandparenting.org/publications [accessed 12 November 2007].Google Scholar
Bourne, J. (2006), Sure Start Children's Centres, National Audit Office (NAO) Report HC 104 Session 2006–2007, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Bovaird, T. (2007), ‘Beyond engagement and participation – user and community co-production of services’, Public Administration Review, 67, 5, 846–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office (1999), ‘Modernising Government’, White Paper, at http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4310/4310–00.htm [accessed 20 November 2007].Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2002), Delivering for Children and Families: Interdepartmental Childcare Review, London: The Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. (2006), ‘Childhood, parenting and early intervention: a critical examination of the Sure Start national programme’, Critical Social Policy, 26, 4, 699–721.Google Scholar
Craig, G., Adamson, S., Nasreen, A., Shehzad, A., Dadze-Arthur, A., Elliott, C., McNamee, S., and Murtuja, B. (2007), Sure Start and Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) Populations, National Evaluation (NESS) Research Report 020, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2006a), ‘Sure Start Children's Centres practice guidance’, at http://www.surestart.gov.uk/publications/?Document=1852 [accessed 8 April 2007].Google Scholar
DfES (2006b), Sure Start Children's Centres Planning and Performance Management Guidance, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
DfES (2007), Governance Guidance for Sure Start Children's Centres and Extended Schools: Every Child Matters – Change for Children, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2007), ‘Indices of deprivation 2007’, at http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/neighbourhoodrenewal/deprivation/deprivation [accessed 7 December 2007].Google Scholar
Department of Health (DOH) (2007), Delivering Health Services through Sure Start Children's Centres, London, DOH.Google Scholar
Glass, N. (1999), ‘Sure Start: the development of an early intervention programme for young children in the United Kingdom’, Children and Society, 13, 257–64.Google Scholar
Glass, N. (2005), ‘Surely some mistake?’, The Guardian (Society), at http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,1074,1383034,00.html [accessed 12 September 2006].Google Scholar
Gray, R. and Francis, E. (2007), ‘The implications of US experiences with early childhood interventions for the UK Sure Start Programme’, Child Care, Health and Development, 33, 6, 655–63.Google Scholar
Levitas, R., Panatzis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., and Patsios, M. (2007), The Multidimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Oliver, D. (1991), ‘Active Citizenship in the 1990s’, Parliamentary Affairs, 44, 157–71.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1996), ‘Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy and development’, World Development, 24, 6, 1073–87.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2000), ‘Government control’, British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks-Heeg, S. (2003), ‘Economy, equity or empowerment? New Labour, communities and urban policy evaluation’, in Imrie, R. and Raco, M. (eds), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy, Bristol, The Policy Press, chapter 10.Google Scholar
Williams, F. and Churchill, H. (2006), Empowering Parents in Sure Start Local Programmes, National Evaluation of Sure Start (NESS) Report, London: HMSO.Google Scholar