Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:51:02.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CCTs for Female Heads of Households and Market Citizenship at State-Level in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2016

Anahely Medrano
Anahely Medrano*
Affiliation:
CONACYT-BUAP, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) have become key anti-poverty reduction strategies in Latin America. There are different types of CCTs implemented at the national and subnational level in this region. This paper analyses the design of CCT programmes directed to assist female heads of households at the state level in Mexico. To do so, the study applies an analytical framework to make a comparative study of the key features of the design, looking specifically at the way the target population is constructed as welfare recipients and citizens. The results of this qualitative study suggest that, irrespective of the purposes of these social programmes, the design reflects certain values and normative beliefs related to the notion of market citizenship, which also seem to intersect with certain ideas about motherhood and the poor in Mexico.

Keywords

policy designconditionalitysingle motherssocial policy at subnational level
Type
Themed Section on Assessing the Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin American Societies in the Early Twenty-First Century
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 495 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barba Solano, C. (2004) ‘Régimen de bienestar y reforma social en México’, Serie Políticas Sociales 92, Santiago de Chile, CEPAL.Google Scholar
Bodsworth, E. E. (2012) ‘Challenging choices: welfare to work, lived lives and told stories’, Deakin University.Google Scholar
Breitkreuz, R. S. (2005) ‘Engendering citizenship: a critical feminist analysis of Canadian welfare-to-work policies and the employment experiences of lone mothers’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 32, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL) (2015) Medición de la Pobreza en México y en las Entidades Federativas, México: CONEVAL.Google Scholar
Cook, K., Davis, E., Smyth, P. and McKenzie, H. (2009) ‘The quality of life of single mothers making the transition from welfare to work’, Women and health, 49, 6–7, 475–90.Google Scholar
De Brauw, A., and Hoddinott, J. (2009) ‘Must Conditional Cash Transfer Programs be conditioned to be effective? The impact of conditioning transfers on school enrollment in Mexico’, Journal of Development Economics, 96, 2, 359–70.Google Scholar
Dutrey, A. P. (2007) ‘Successful targeting? Reporting efficiency and costs in targeted poverty alleviation programs’, Programme Paper Number 35’, Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Fuller, S., Pulkingham, J. and Kershaw, P. (2007) ‘Constructing “active citizenship”: single mothers, welfare, and the logics of voluntarism’, Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, http://www.bibliocatalogo.buap.mx:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=34595043&lang=es&site=eds-live.Google Scholar
Gazso, A. (2009) ‘Gendering the “responsible risk taker”: citizenship relationships with gender-neutral social assistance policy’, Citizenship Studies, 13, 1, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazso, A. and McDaniel, S. A. (2010) ‘The risks of being a lone mother on income support in Canada and the USA’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30, 7/8, 368–86.Google Scholar
Gobierno del Estado de Jalisco (2014) Reglas de Operación del Programa Apoyo a Mujeres jefas de familia, http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Documentos/Estatal/Jalisco/wo92845.pdf.Google Scholar
Gobierno del Estado de Jalisco (2015) ‘Reglas de Operación del Programa Apoyo a Mujeres jefas de familia’, http://periodicooficial.jalisco.gob.mx/sites/periodicooficial.jalisco.gob.mx/files/02-07-15-ix.pdf.Google Scholar
Gobierno del Estado de México (2015) ‘Reglas de Operación del Programa Mujeres que lo Logran en Grande’, http://legislacion.edomex.gob.mx/sites/legislacion.edomex.gob.mx/files/files/pdf/gct/2015/ene304.PDF.Google Scholar
Gobierno del Estado de Nuevo León (2012) ‘Reglas de Operación del Programa Jefas de Familia’, http://archivo.nl.gob.mx/?P=sdsocial_mujeres_jefas.Google Scholar
INEGI, (2015) Mujeres y hombres en México. Aguascalientes: INEGI.Google Scholar
Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L. and DeLeon, P. (2007) ‘Social construction and policy design’, Theories of the policy process, 2, 93–126.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, K. (2006) Statecraft, Welfare, and the Politics of Inclusion, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagarde, M. (1993) Los cautiverios de las mujeres: madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Luccisano, L. and Romagnoli, A. (2007) ‘Comparing public social provision and citizenship in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: are there implications for a North American space?’, Politics and Policy, 35, 4, 716–51.Google Scholar
Lund, F., Noble, M., Barnes, H. and Wright, G. (2009) ‘Is there a rationale for conditional cash transfers for children in South Africa? Transformation’, Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 70, 70–91.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1964) Class, Citizenship and Social Development, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Medrano, A. (2013) ‘Elites and poverty in the neoliberal era: the case of Mexico’, Poverty and Public Policy, 5, 2, 203–23.Google Scholar
Medrano, A. and Berrios, P. (2013) ‘Política social en ámbito subnacional en México: análisis del diseño de programas de apoyo económico para mujeres en tres entidades federativas’, Buenos Aires: CLACSO, http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/collect/clacso/index/assoc/D9269.dir/final.pdf.Google Scholar
Medrano, A. (2015) ‘Construcción de ciudadanía social y gobiernos subnacionales: efectos de la política social del Distrito Federal en el ámbito nacional’, Reflexión Política, 17, 34, 74–87.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2006) ‘Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: progresa/oportunidades, Mexico's conditional transfer programme’, Social Policy and Administration, 40, 4, 425–49.Google Scholar
Palomar, C. (2004) ‘Malas madres: la construcción social de la maternidad’, Debate feminista, 15, 30, 12–34.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2006) ‘Active citizenship: the new face of welfare’, paper presented at the International Conference Welfare State Change: Conceptualisation, measurement and interpretation, Store Restrup Herregaard, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M. D., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A. and Peterson, H. (2014) Social construction and policy design: a review of past applications’, Policy Studies Journal, 42, 1, 1–29.Google Scholar
PNUD (2015) ‘Índice de Desarrollo Humano para las entidades federativas, México 2015’, http://www.mx.undp.org/.Google Scholar
Pomar Fernández, S. and Martínez Vázquez, G. (2007) ‘Resignificación identitaria, trabajo y familia: Una disyuntiva para la mujer’, Administración y Organizaciones, 9,18, 95–109.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (2003) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sánchez Bringas, Á., Espinosa, S., Ezcurdia, C. and Torres, E. (2004) ‘Nuevas maternidades o la desconstrucción de la maternidad en México’, Debate Feminista, 30,15, 55–86.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1993) ‘Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy’, American Political Science Review, 87, 02, 334–47.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. L. and Ingram, H. M. (1997) Policy Design for Democracy, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. L. and Ingram, H. M. (2005) Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Sidney, M. (2009) ‘What is next for policy design and social construction theory?’, Policy Studies Journal, 37, 1, 103–19.Google Scholar
Schild, V. (2000) ‘Neo-liberalism's new gendered market citizens: the “civilizing”dimension of social programmes in Chile’, Citizenship Studies, 4, 3, 275–305.Google Scholar
Valencia Lomelí, E. (2010) ‘Los debates sobre los regímenes de bienestar en América Latina y en el Este de Asia: Los casos de México y Corea del Sur’, Espiral, Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad, 16, 47, 65–103.Google Scholar
Walter, M. (2002) ‘Working their way out of poverty? Sole motherhood, work, welfare and material well-being’, Journal of Sociology, 38, 4, 361–80.Google Scholar
Weiss, J. A. (1989) ‘The powers of problem definition: the case of government paperwork’, Policy Sciences, 22, 2, 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ypeij, A. and Ypeij, J. L. (2009) Single Motherhood and Poverty: The Case of the Netherlands, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar