Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:16:18.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Useful Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Anne Corden  and
Jane Millar
Anne Corden
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York E-mail: [email protected]
Jane Millar
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy, Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy, University of Bath, Bath E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are many key references in the articles in this themed section, including the review article. Rather than repeating those, here we give some web references and also some specific references to the topic of archiving and secondary analysis of qualitative data (with thanks to Rachel Thomson who provided these). This is not a topic that we have covered in any depth in this themed section but it is an important area for anyone thinking of adopting this methodology. We also provide some references on ethical issues.

Type
Some useful sources
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 593 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References on archiving and secondary analysis (with acknowledgement to Rachel Thomson)

Bishop, L. (2005), ‘Protecting respondents and enabling data sharing: reply to Parry and Mauthner’, Sociology, 39, 2, 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornat, J. (2003), ‘A second take: revisiting interviews with a different purpose’, Oral History, Spring, 47–53.Google Scholar
Bornat, J. (2005), ‘Recycling the evidence: different approaches to the reanalysis of gerontological data’, Forum: Qualitative Research [On-line Journal], 6, 1, Art. 42. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-42-e.htm [Date of access: 4 August 2006].Google Scholar
Corti, L. (2000, December), ‘Progress and problems of preserving and providing access to qualitative data for social research – the international picture of an emerging culture’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm.Google Scholar
Corti, L. (2006), Methodological Innovations On-Line, 1, 2, 2006). Special edition: ‘Making qualitative data more re-usable: issues of context and representation’, www.sirius.soc.plymouth.ac.uk/~andyp/.Google Scholar
Corti, L. and Thompson, P. (2003), ‘Secondary analysis of archive data’, in Searle, C. et al. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage Publications, www.sagepub.co.uk/book.aspx?pid=104452.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. (1997), ‘Qualitative data archiving: some reflections on its prospects and problems’, Sociology, 31, 1, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, J. (2004) Re-working Qualitative Data, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S., Holland, J. and Thomson, R. (2006), ‘Making the long view: the question of context from the perspective of archiving a qualitative longitudinal study’, Methodological Innovations Online, 1, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J., Thomson, R. and Henderson, S. (2004), Feasibility Study for a Possible Longitudinal Study: Discussion Paper, www.lsbu.ac.uk/inventingadulthoods/feasibility_study.pdf.Google Scholar
Mauthner, N., Parry, O. and Backett-Milburn, K. (1998), ‘The data are out there, or are they? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data’, Sociology, 32, 4, 733–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, O. and Mauthner, N. (2004), ‘Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative data’, Sociology, 38, 1, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, O. and Mauthner, N. (2005), ‘Back to basics: who re-uses qualitative data and why?’, Sociology, 39, 2, 337–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ethics

British Sociological Association (2002), Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association, March 2002, Durham: British Sociological Association, www.britsoc.co.uk/equality/63.htm.Google Scholar
Social Research Association (2003), Ethical Guidelines, London: Social Research Association, www.the-sra.org.uk/documents/pdfs/ethics03.pdf.Google Scholar