Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:17:30.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government Transfers and Poverty Alleviation among Older Adults in the United States from 2002 to 2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2020

Peiyi Lu ,
Mack Shelley  and
Yi-Long Liu
Peiyi Lu
Affiliation:
Gerontology Program, Department of Political Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Mack Shelley
Affiliation:
Departments of Political Science and Statistics, Iowa State University, USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Yi-Long Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies have indicated government transfers greatly alleviate poverty among older Americans. Yet recent social policy changes were suggested to increase older Americans’ fiscal insecurity. New evidence is needed to expand the evaluation of government transfers. Longitudinal Health and Retirement Study data from 2002 to 2014 were used. We computed individuals’ poverty status both when household income included and did not include government transfers. Results indicated the poverty rate dropped dramatically when household income included government transfers. The poverty alleviation effect was significantly greater among people who were female, older, members of a minority group, having fewer years of education, residing in the South, and living in a bigger household. Evidence from this study solidified the overall poverty alleviation effect of government transfers in old age. Differential effects among various demographic groups could be attributed to their initial status and divergent political beliefs about who should receive government transfers.

Keywords

Government transfersantipoverty policyolder adultshealth and retirement study
Type
Article
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 561 - 579
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Shalom, Y., Moffitt, R. A. and Scholz, J. K. (2011) An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Anti-poverty Programs in the United States, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics, https://www.nber.org/papers/w17042.pdf [accessed 11.11.2018].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitler, M. and Hoynes, H. (2016) ‘The more things change, the more they stay the same? The safety net and poverty in the Great Recession’, Journal of Labor Economics, 34, S1, S403–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitler, M. P. and Karoly, L. A. (2015) ‘Intended and unintended effects of the war on poverty: what research tells us and implications for policy’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 3, 639–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, D. (2019) ‘Theories of the causes of poverty’, Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cellini, S. R., McKernan, S. M. and Ratcliffe, C. (2008) ‘The dynamics of poverty in the United States: a review of data, methods, and findings’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 3, 577–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Goede, M. (1996) ‘Ideology in the US welfare debate: neo-liberal representations of poverty’, Discourse and Society, 7, 3, 317–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiszbein, A. and Schady, N. R. (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty, Washington, DC: The World Bank, http://81.17.84.10/bitstream/20.500.12323/2851/1/Conditional%20Cash%20Transfers_report.pdf [accessed 12.11.2018].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, L., Wimer, C., Garfinkel, I., Kaushal, N. and Waldfogel, J. (2015) ‘Waging war on poverty: poverty trends using a historical supplemental poverty measure’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 3, 567–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilens, M. (2009) Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haveman, R., Blank, R., Moffitt, R., Smeeding, T. and Wallace, G. (2015) ‘The war on poverty: measurement, trends, and policy’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 3, 593–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwan, C. and Walsh, C. A. (2018) ‘Old age poverty: a scoping review of the literature’, Cogent Social Sciences, 4, 1, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1478479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, C. and Louth, J. (2019) ‘The neoliberal production of deserving and undeserving poor: a critique of the Australian experience of microfinance’, Social Policy and Society, 1–17, doi: 10.1017/S1474746419000125.Google Scholar
Marchand, J. and Smeeding, T. (2016) ‘Poverty and aging’, in Moody, H. R. and Sasser, J. R. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 905–50.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. D. and Sullivan, J. (2012) Dimensions of Progress: Poverty from the Great Society to the Great Recession, Paper presented at the Fall 2012 Brookings Panel on Economic Activity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B. D. and Sullivan, J. X. (2013) Winning the War: Poverty from the Great Society to the Great Recession, Working Paper 18718, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, https://www.nber.org/papers/w18718.pdf [accessed 24.11.2018].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. H. (2013) ‘Changing social security in the US: rising insecurity?’, Social Policy and Society, 12, 1, 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, J., Moller, S. and Karides, M. (2003) ‘Envisioning dependency: changing media depictions of welfare in the 20th century’, Social Problems, 50, 4, 482-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, R. A. (2015) ‘The deserving poor, the family, and the US welfare system’, Demography, 52, 3, 729–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, H. R. and Sasser, J. R. (2018a) ‘Should age or need be the basis for entitlement?’, in Aging Concepts and Controversies, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 149–60.Google Scholar
Moody, H. R. and Sasser, J. R. (2018b) ‘What Is the future for social security?’, in Aging Concepts and Controversies, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 161–74.Google Scholar
Rank, M. R. (2006) ‘Toward a new understanding of American poverty’, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 20, 17–51.Google Scholar
Rank, M. R. and Hirschl, T. A. (2002) ‘Welfare use as a life course event: toward a new understanding of the US safety net’, Social Work, 47, 3, 237–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rector, R. and Sheffield, R. (2014) The War on Poverty After 50 Years, Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, http://ohiofamilyrights.com/Reports/Reports/Special-Reports-Page-4/The-War-on-Poverty-After-50-Years.pdf [accessed 11.11.2018].Google Scholar
Rushefsky, M. E. (2017) ‘Poverty and welfare: the poor ye always have with you?’, in Public Policy in the United States: Challenges, Opportunities, and Changes, New York: Routledge, 171–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, L., Giannarelli, L., Schiferl, M. and Zedlewski, S. R. (2011) ‘How do states’ safety net policies affect poverty?’, Poverty and Public Policy, 3, 4, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziliak, J. P. (2015) Recent Developments in Antipoverty Policies in the United States, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar