Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:56:23.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civil Society, Social Policy and Participatory Democracy: Past, Present and Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Fred Powell
Fred Powell*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Social Studies, and Institute of Social Science for the Twenty-first Century, National University of Ireland, Cork E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article sets out to explore the relationship between civil society, social policy and participatory democracy, challenging the paternalistic and egoistic tradition of charity and the voluntary sector as its defining paradigm. Civil society is linked to the right to associate for social and political purposes. Radical and liberal traditions of civil society are compared and contrasted. It is suggested that historically participatory democracy can be viewed as a Social Left that embraces the politics of difference (recognition/respect) and equality (social justice/redistribution) through the mobilisation of the poor and excluded. The emphasis is on the activist citizen (new social movements) as opposed to the traditional active citizen (charity). It is concluded that this version of civil society potentially offers a new political and cultural grammar for the discourse of social policy – that is reflexive, inclusive and democratic.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 49 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anheier, H. and Seibel, W. (2001), The Non-Profit Sector in Germany, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Archambault, E. (1997), The Non-Profit Sector in France, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998), Acts of Resistance, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2000), ‘A literature from below’, The Nation, 3 July, pp. 25–8.Google Scholar
Byrne, P. (1997), Social Movements in Britain, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colas, D. (1997), Civil Society and Fanaticism, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, N. (1997), Europe: A History, London: Random House.Google Scholar
De Sousa Santos, B. (2007), Democratising Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
De Sousa Santos, B. (2008), Another Knowledge is Possible, London: Verso.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, A. (1956), Democracy in America, New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (2004), Civil Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1993), The Condition of the Working Class in England (originally published in 1844), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1993), The Spirit of Community, New York, NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1995), Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001), The Culture of Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harriss, J. (2002), Depoliticizing Development, London: Anthem Books.Google Scholar
Judt, T. (2007), ‘Supercapitalism’, New York Review of Books, 6 December, pp. 22–7.Google Scholar
Kaldor, M. (2003), Global Civil Society: An Answer to War, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kedward, R. (2005), La Vie en Bleu, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kirby, P. (2001), Introduction to Latin America, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kirby, P. (2003), Introduction to Latin America: Twenty-First Century Challenges, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kline, N. (2007), The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2000), The Democratic Paradox, London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Paine, T. (1969), The Essential Thomas Paine, New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Piven, F. and Cloward, R. (1979), Poor People's Movements, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Powell, F. (2007), The Politics of Civil Society: Neoliberalism or Social Left, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Powell, F. and Geoghegan, M. (2004), The Politics of Community Development, Dublin: A&A Farmar.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, London and New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ringen, S. (2006), ‘Built by association’, Times Literary Supplement, 1 September.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2007), The Demands of Liberty, Cambridge, CA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1996), The Concept of the Political, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. (2001), Beyond Neoliberalism, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar