Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:17:46.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CORRUPTION, CHARACTER, AND INSTITUTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2019

Mario Villarreal-Diaz
Mario Villarreal-Diaz*
Affiliation:
Enterprise and Policy Analytics, University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Is corruption merely a flaw of character, or is it more fundamentally related to the institutional environment? Scholars from various disciplines mainly side with the narrative that, ultimately, corruption is a problem of character flaws. Policy prescriptions around the world are designed based on this understanding. In this essay, I challenge this understanding, arguing that it is at best incomplete, and misleading at worst. I argue that we should focus instead on three aspects of how the prevalence of virtuous acts is profoundly tied to people’s institutional environment and the incentive structure that derives from it. First, I observe that there is a difference between virtue and acting virtuously, and that even with the aid of moral education and coercion, virtue itself is hard to come by. Second, I discuss how formal institutions and social norms influence people’s propensity to perform virtuous acts rather than engage in corruption. Finally, I explore how institutions that increase the transaction costs associated with everyday life also increase the prevalence of corruption. Based on these three explorations I derive some public policy guidelines that, if followed, might increase the probability of success of anticorruption programs.

Keywords

Corruptioncharactervirtueinstitutionstransaction cost
Type
Research Article
Information
Social Philosophy and Policy , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , Winter 2018 , pp. 264 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank the other contributors to this volume, as well as the journal’s anonymous reviewer, for their insightful comments.

References

1 Precise estimations are hard to obtain and there are discrepancies among sources. Quoted estimates are based on data from the Secretaria de Seguridad Pública de la Ciudad de México, http://www.ssp.cdmx.gob.mx/

2 See Rotberg, Robert I., The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders Can Combat Graft (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017), 290–94 and 301–321;Google Scholar Underkuffler, Laura S., Captured by Evil: The Idea of Corruption in Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013), 242–43.Google Scholar Notably, organizational behavior literature explores the importance of rules in promoting desirable behavior and good character. See Katz, Daniel, “The Motivational Basis of Organizational Behavior,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 9, no. 2, (1964): 1099–1743.Google ScholarPubMed

3 For a contrasting view, see Ferretti’s paper in this volume. Her analysis suggests that institutional corruption can always be traced to corrupt individuals’ actions, thus her “continuity” theory. On my model, by contrast, people create institutions. In the process, because they have limited foresight, they can inadvertently institute opportunities and incentives that corrupt agents interacting with the institutions they create. Where my model is accurate, it explains rather than merely posits corruption.

4 Jain, A., “Corruption: A Review,” Journal of Economic Surveys 15, no. 1 (2001): 71–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 In economics, this is called rent-seeking. See, Tullock, Gordon, “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft,” Western Economic Journal 5 (1967): 224–32;Google Scholar Krueger, Anne O., “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society,” American Economic Review 64 (1974): 291–303.Google Scholar

6 Nye, J. S., “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis,” The American Political Science Review 61, no. 2 (1967): 417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 An economic rent is the difference between the minimum payment needed to bring a factor of production —labor, capital, or land—into productive use, and what is actually paid. For example, let’s say that a person will be willing to work for 10 dollars per hour, but gets paid 12 dollars per hour. The 2 dollar difference is an economic rent. Corruption can be used to increase these excess payments by granting special privileges not available to others, such as licenses, quotas, monopoly power, and so on.

8 Rose-Ackerman, Susan, Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a classic approach to the issue also see Rose-Ackerman, Susan, Corruption: A Study in Political Economy (New York: Academic Press, 1978).Google Scholar

9 Jain, “Corruption,” 73.

10 Underkuffler, Captured by Evil, 223.

11 Ibid., 58.

12 Parker, Wilmer III, “Every Person Has a Price?” in Rider, Barry ed., Corruption: The Enemy Within (The Hague : Kluwer Law International, 1997), 87.Google Scholar

13 Brooks, Robert C., “The Nature of Political Corruption,” in Heidenheimer, Arnold J. ed., Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1978), 56.Google Scholar

14 Digital Edition of the 1755 Classic Dictionary by Samuel Johnson accessed on July 15th, 2017. http://johnsonsdictionaryonline.com/?p=16540

15 Heywood, P. M. and Rose, Jonathan, “Curbing Corruption or Promoting Integrity? Probing the Hidden Conceptual Challenge,” in Hardi, P., Heywood, M., and Torsello, D., eds., Debates of Corruption and Integrity (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 109–110.Google Scholar

16 Aristotle, , The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Ross, W. D. and Brown, Lesley (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 1107a.Google Scholar

17 Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1103a.

18 Annas, Julia, Intelligent Virtue (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 11079b.

20 Ibid., 1104b.

21 Ibid., 1179b.

22 For an account of how acting on one’s self-interest is related to morality, see Kapur Badhwar, Neera, "Altruism versus Self-Interest: Sometimes a False Dichotomy," Social Philosophy and Policy 10, no. 1 (1993): 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 For a comprehensive review of the principal-agent theory see, Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Martimort, David, The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Akerlof, George, “The Market for ‘Lemons’,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 3 (1970): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Ugur, Mehmet and Dasgupta, Nandini, “Corruption and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidence on Low-Income Countries and Beyond,” MPRA Paper No. 31226 (2011).Google Scholar

26 Persson, Anna, Rothstein, Bo, and Teorell, Jan, "Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail—Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem," Governance 26, no. 3 (2013): 449–71;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Ivanov, Kalin, “The Limits of a Global Campaign against Corruption,” in Bracking, Sarah, ed., Corruption and Development. The Anti-Corruption Campaigns (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 28–45;Google Scholar Lawson, Letitia, “The Politics of Anti-Corruption Reform in Africa,” Journal of Modern African Studies 47, no. 1 (2009): 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Becker, Gary S. and Stigler, George J., “Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers,” Journal of Legal Studies 3, no. 1 (1974): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Persson, Rothstein, and Teorell, “Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail,” 4.

29 Rose-Ackerman, Susan, “Governance and Corruption,” in Lomborg, B. ed., Global Crises, Global Solutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 310–11.Google Scholar

30 Klitgaard, , Controling Corruption (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 1988) 23–24.Google Scholar

31 Persson, Rothstein, and Teorell, “Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail,” 3.

32 Ibid., 2–3.

33 Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, “Controlling Corruption through Collective Action,” Journal of Democracy 24, no. 1 (2013): 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Ostrom, Elinor, "A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997," American Political Science Review 92, no. 1 (1998): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Rothstein, Bo, “Anti-Corruption: The Indirect ‘Big Bang’ Approach,” Review of International Political Economy 18 (2011): 228–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Underkuffler, Captured by Evil, 225.

37 For a basic introduction see Dixit, Avinash K. and Skeath, Susan, Games of Strategy: Fourth International Student Edition (W. W. Norton and Company, 2015).Google Scholar For an excellent applied account to collective action problems, see Gaus, Gerald, "A Tale of Two Sets: Public Reason in Equilibrium," Public Affairs Quarterly 25, no. 4 (2011): 305–325.Google Scholar

38 Marquette, Heather and Peiffer, Caryn, “Corruption and Collective Action,” UK DLP Research Paper 32 (2015): 16.Google Scholar

39 Adsera, Alicia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, Mark, “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19, no. 2 (2003): 445–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert W., "Corruption," Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3 (1993): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Barro, Robert J., “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model,” Public Choice 14, no. 1 (1973): 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Teorell, Jan, “Corruption as an Institution: Rethinking the Origins of the Grabbing Hand,” Working Paper Series No. 5, The Quality of Government Institute, Göteborg University (2007).Google Scholar

43 Rotberg, Corruption Cure, 3–7 and 130–75.

44 Underkuffler, Captured by Evil, 223–43.

45 Rotberg, Corruption Cure, 30.

46 Klitgaard, Controling Corruption, 42.

47 Rose-Ackerman, Susan and Palifka, Bonnie J., Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Nye, Corruption and Political Development, 12.

49 Leff, Nathaniel H., "Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption," American Behavioral Scientist 8, no. 3 (1964): 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50 Scott, James C., Comparative Political Corruption (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972), 37.Google Scholar

51 Rotberg, Corruption Cure, 29. Rotberg further critiques the argument by saying that “there is no added functionality in dysfunctionality.” Additionally, he correctly points out the role of corruption in granting fake licenses, permits, inspections, and so on, that may pose a real danger for a society. This would be a case where corruption increases transaction costs.

52 Coase, Ronald H., "The Nature of the Firm," Economica 4, no. 16 (1937): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 See North, Douglass C., Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic Performance (San Francisco, CA: ICS Press, 1992);Google Scholar North, Douglass C., "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review 84, no. 3 (1994): 359–68;Google Scholar Schmidtz, David, "The Institution of Property," Social Philosophy and Policy 11, no. 2 (1994): 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54 North, Douglass C., “Institutions” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, no. 1 (1991): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 For an account of the economizing approach, see Robertson, Dennis H., "What Does the Economist Economize?" Economic Commentaries (1956): 148.Google Scholar

56 Rotberg, Corruption Cure, 32.

57 Ibid., 41.

58 Ibid., 310.

59 Ibid., 38.

60 Ibid., 312.

61 André Melo, Marcus, Pereira, Carlos, and Mauricio Figueiredo, Carlos, "Political and Institutional Checks on Corruption: Explaining the Performance of Brazilian Audit Institutions," Comparative Political Studies 42, no. 9 (2009): 1217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Rose-Ackerman, Susan, Corruption: A Study in Political Economy (New York: Academic Press, 1978), 6–10.Google Scholar

63 Collier, Paul, "How to Reduce Corruption," African Development Review 12, no. 2 (2000): 191–205;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Mungiu, Alina, "Corruption: Diagnosis and Treatment," Journal of Democracy 17, no. 3 (2006): 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64 For a regrettable set of examples, see Kulczycki, Andrzej and Windle, Sarah, “Honor Killings in the Middle East and North Africa: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Violence Against Women 17, no. 11 (2011): 1442–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

65 Rose-Ackerman and Palifka, Corruption and Government, 436.

66 Tsebelis, George, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

67 North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990);CrossRefGoogle Scholar Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James, The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development (World Bank Publications, 2010);CrossRefGoogle Scholar McCloskey, Deirdre N., “It Was Ideas and Ideologies, Not Interests or Institutions, Which Changed in Northwestern Europe, 1600–1848,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 25, no. 1 (2015): 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar