Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:56:39.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Steven L. Hoch's “B. N. Mironov and His 'Demographic Processes and Problems'”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Boris N. Mironov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A forum on Boris Mironov's Russian and English editions of The Social History of Imperial Russia, 1700-1917 (2000) offers the comments of four scholars on different aspects of Mironov's work. David L. Ransel introduces the forum with a consideration of whether Russian and western historical scholarship has been or should be converging, and he reviews the Russian-language response to Mironov's book. William G. Wagner discusses Mironov's key conclusions: that the imperial period was marked by the development of a more individualistic personality, the democratic nuclear family, civil society, and a state order based on the rule of law. He questions, however, the validity of the modernization paradigm as an adequate tool for analyzing these developments. Willard Sunderland comments on the use of the concept of empire in Mironov's book, calling attention to the assertion that imperial Russia was a “normal” European state and that it was not a “true colonial state.” The focus of the book, he argues, remains Russian society within the space of the empire, not the society of the empire as a whole. Steven L. Hoch considers Mironov's chapter on demographic processes, criticizing the use of demographic theory and its application to problems such as fertility and mortality. He also argues that Mironov accepts too uncritically the utility of the statistical data at hand. Boris Mironov responds to Wagnar, Sunderland, and Hoch in turn.

Type
Forum
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , Fall 2001 , pp. 591 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kinsey, Alfred C., Pomeroy, Wardell B., and Martin, Clyde E., Sexual Behavior in theHuman Male (Philadelphia, 1948), 219.Google Scholar

2. Daniel Kaiser, “Domestic Life in Early Modern Russia” (paper presented at the conference, “Family Forms in Russian and Ukrainian History in Comparative Perspective,“ University of Vienna, November, 2000); Czap, Peter, “Marriage and the Peasant Joint Family in the Era of Serfdom,” in Ransel, David L., ed., The Family in Imperial Russia: New Linesof Historical Research (Urbana, 1978), 112–13Google Scholar.

3. Semenova, Lidiia N., Ocherki istorii byta i kul´turnoi zhizni Rossii: Pervaia polovina XVIIIv. (Leningrad, 1982), 18,26.Google Scholar

4. Hellie, Richard, Slavery in Russia, 1450-1725 (Chicago, 1982), 438, 687.Google Scholar

5. On this, see Kaiser, Daniel H. and Engel, Peyton, “Time-Awareness and Age- Awareness in Early Modern Russia,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 35, no. 4 (October 1993): 824–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. John Bushnell, “Peasant Marriage in Riazan uezd, 1690-1960: Demography, Geography, Seasonality” (Unpublished paper, 1992).

7. Coale, AnsleyJ., Anderson, Barbara, and Härm, Erna, Human Fertility in Russia sincethe Nineteenth Century (Princeton, 1979).Google Scholar

8. Ibid., 17.

9. Ross, John A., ed., International Encyclopedia ofPopulation (New York, 1982), 1:98–99.Google Scholar

10. Coale, Ansley J., Factors Associated with the Development of Low Fertility (New York, 1966), vol. 2.Google Scholar

11. Giliarovskii, F. V., Issledovaniia o rozhdenii i smertnosti detei v Novgorodskoi gubernii (St. Petersburg, 1866), 74 Google Scholar; P. Griaznov, Opyt sravnitel´nogo izucheniia gigienicheskikh usloviikrest´ianskogo byta i mediko-topografiia Cherepovetskogo uezda (St. Petersburg, 1880), 168; T. Ivanovskaia, “Deti v poslovitsakh i pogovorkakh,” Vestnik vospitania, bk. 2 (1908): 122; Tian-Shanskaia, Ol´ga Semenova, Zhizn´ “Ivana” (St. Petersburg, 1914; reprint, Riazan', 1995), 7– 8;Google Scholar V Stepanov, “Svedeniia o rodil´nykh i krestil´nykh obriadakh v Klinskom uezde Moskovskoigubernii,“ Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 1906, no. 3-4:222; Shein, P. V., Velikoros vsvoikhpe.sniakh,obriadakh, obychaiakh, verovaniiakh, skazkakh, legendakh i t.p. (St. Petersburg, 1898), vol. 1, pt. 1, p. 10 Google Scholar; A. N. Engel´gardt, Iz derevni: 12pisem, 1872-1887 (Moscow, 1937), 68; Zhbankov, D. N., Vliianie otkhozhikh promyslov na dvizhenie narodonaseleniia Kostromskoi guberniipo dannym 1866-1883gg. (Kostroma, 1887), 17, 87 Google Scholar.

12. Tomilin, S. A., “K voprosu o plodovitosti krest´ianki i vliianii ee na detskuiu smertnost´,“ in Riabushkin, T. V., ed., Sovetskaia demografiia za 70 let: Is istorii nauki (Moscow, y), 107–9.Google Scholar

13. Mironov, Boris N., Sotsial´naia istoriia Rossiiperioda imperii (XVIII-nachaloXXv.): Genezislichnosti, demokraticheskoi sem´i, grazhdanskogo obshchestva i pravovogo gosudarstva, 2 vols. (St. Petersburg, 1999), 1:186.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., 1:186.

15. Ibid., 1:184-85.

16. Ibid., 2:349.

17. Ibid., 2:346, 2:349. Merl´, Stephan, “Ekonomicheskaia sistema i uroven´ zhizni v dorevoliutsionnoi Rossii i Sovetskom Soiuze: Ozhidaniia i real´nost´,'’ Otechestvennaia istoriia, 1998, no. 1:98–99 Google Scholar; Gregory, Paul, “Russian Living Standards during the Industrialization Era, 1885-1913,” Review of Income and Wealth 26 (1980): 87–113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Ibid., 1:195, 1:191.