Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:35:14.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comment
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , Winter 1984 , pp. 667 - 671
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. While I disagree with the interpretation presented in Thomas Sanders's paper, I would like to compliment him for the gentlemanly and professional demeanor in which he proffered his criticism of my work.

2. Simms, “Crisis in Russian Agriculture,” p. 390. See also Gerschenkron, Alexander, “Agrarian Policies and Industrialization: Russia 1861–1917,” in Habakkuk, H. J. and Postan, N., eds., Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. 4, part 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965), p. 778 Google Scholar; Raymond W. Goldsmith, “The Economic Growth of Tsarist Russia 1860–1913,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9 (April 1961): 442; Gregory, Paul, Russian National Income, 1885–1913 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 130–31Google Scholar.

3. See, for example, Gerschenkron, Alexander, “Problems and Patterns of Russian Economic Development,” in Black, Cyril, ed., The Transformation of Russian Society (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960), pp. 56–57 Google Scholar.

4. Gregory, Russian National Income, pp. 130–31.

5. Simms, “Crisis in Russian Agriculture,” pp. 378, 384.

6. See Miliukov, Paul, Russia and Its Crisis (New York: Collier Books, 1962), p. 325 Google Scholar; Sergeevskii, Ivan, Golod v Rossii (Geneva: Society of Old Populists, 1892), p. 32 Google Scholar; Nikolai–on, , Ocherkinashego poreformennago khoziaistva (St. Petersburg, 1893), pp. 258–59.Google Scholar

7. Von Laue, Theodore H., “The High Cost and the Gamble of the Witte System,” in Readings in Russian History, vol. 2, ed. Harcave, Sidney (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1968), p. 70.Google Scholar Emphasis added.

8. Gregory, Russian National Income, pp. 137–38.

9. Emphasis added.

10. Emphasis added.

11. See Shcherbina, F. A., “Krest'ianskie biudzhety i zavisimost’ ikh ot urozhaev i tsen na khleba,” in Chuprov, A. I. and Posnikov, A. S., eds., Vliianie urozhaev i khlebnykh tsen na nekotoriia storony russkago narodnago khoziaistva, vol. 2 (St. Petersburg, 1897), pp. 1–79 Google Scholar.

12. Volin, Lazar, A Century of Russian Agriculture: From Alexander II to Khrushchev (Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970), p. 63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. Simms, “Crisis in Russian Agriculture,” p. 380.

14. I do not feel that I quoted Pavlovsky out of context, as Sanders charges in n. 41. See Simms, “Crisis in Russian Agriculture.” p. 386.

15. Ibid., pp. 380–85.