Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T04:04:21.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Jack V. Haney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 41 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brown suggests that there are several fairly distinct gradations of the nationalist (culturalist) movement ranging from extreme chauvinism to a more benign liberal nationalism, with the “Russites” and “ruralists” occupying the center. But Brown himself acknowledges the difficulties of trying to classify various currents in the movement too rigidly. See Deming, Brown, “Nationalism and Ruralism in Recent Soviet Russian Literature,” Review of National Literatures, 3, no. 1 (Spring 1972) : 183–209.Google Scholar

2. “Vysokii dolg masterov kul'tury” (“The Lofty Duty of Experts of Culture“), Pravda, Nov. 30, 1972.

3. A. Iakovlev, “Protiv antiistorizma,” Literaturnaia gazeta, Nov. 15, 1972.