Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:13:35.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The One-Day Votive Church: A Religious Response to the Black Death in Early Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Russell Zguta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1892, as Moscow prepared to celebrate the five-hundredth anniversary of the death of Saint Sergei of Radonezh, an article appeared in the Moskovskiia vedomosti which suggested that one appropriate way to mark the occasion would be to erect a replica of the small wooden Church of the Holy Trinity built by Saint Sergei at the site of his famed monastery north of Moscow. The article further urged that the project be a cooperative effort and that the proposed church be constructed in one day (that is, a twenty-four-hour period), in the tradition of the obydennye khramy of old.’ The tradition which the civic-minded writer of the article tried to revive dated back to the late fourteenth century. The early Russian chronicles record nineteen one-day votive churches built between 1390 and 1552, all as a response to the pestilence then raging. Ten of these were constructed in Novgorod, nine in Pskov. In addition, four others, one each in Moscow, Iaroslavl', Vologda, and Viatka, can be documented from other sources. All were built of wood in a twenty-four-hour period by communal labor.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , Fall 1981 , pp. 423 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This article was supported in part by funds from the Research Council of the University of Missouri, Columbia and by a grant from the National Library of Medicine (N1H LM 03163) which 1 gratefully acknowledge. Sincere thanks are also due the staff of the Slavic Library of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for their expert, untiring help.

1. Sergei, , “K 500 letnemu iubileiu prepodobnago Sergiia” Moskovskiia vedomosti, 1892, no. 254, p. 2 Google Scholar. Even though donations for the project began streaming in immediately, it never got off the ground for lack of official approval ( S. A., Belokurov, “Skazanie o postroenii obydennago khrama v Vologde vo izbavlenie ot smertonosnyia iazvy” Chteniia v Imperatorskom obshchestve istorii i drevnostei rossiskikh pri Moskovskom universilete, 3 [1893], p. IIIGoogle Scholar).

2. In Novgorod the obydennye khramy were St. Afanasii (1390), Nasonov, A. N., ed., Novgorodskaiapervaia letopis'starshego i mladshego izvodov (Moscow-Leningrad, 1950), p. 384 Google Scholar; St. Anastasiia, St. lliia, and St. Afanasii (1417), ibid., p. 408; the Merciful Savior (1424), Polnoe sobranie russkikh lelopisei (hereafter PSRL), vol. 4, pt. 1: Novgorodskaia chetvertaia letopis', no. 2 (Leningrad, 1925), pp. 431-32; St. Semeon (1467), ibid., p. 446; the Holy Virgin (1507), ibid., p. 469; St. Marko (1533), PSRL, vol. 3: Novgorodskaia tret'ia letopis’ (St. Petersburg, 1841), p. 249; Prepodobnyi Kirill Belozerskii and St. Khristofor the Martyr (1552), ibid., p. 251.

3. In Pskov, the obydennye khramy were St. Afanasii (1407), Nasonov, A. N., ed., Pskovskie letopisi, 2 vols. (Moscow, 1941-55), 2:114–15Google Scholar; All Merciful Savior (1420), ibid., p. 38; Holy Virgin (1442), ibid., 1:46; St. Variant (1466), ibid., p. 72; Sacred Image of Jesus Christ and St. Anastasiia (1487), ibid., 2:223; St. Varlam Khutynskii and the Intercession of the Holy Virgin (1522), ibid., p. 227; Archangel Gavrilo (1532), ibid., 1:105.

4. The four others were in Moscow, St. Iliia (1480), Dmitrii, Zelenin, “'Obydennyia’ polotentsa i obydennye khramy” Zhivaia starina, 20, no. 1 (1911): 16Google Scholar; in Iaroslavl', the Savior (1612), Ioann Solov'ev, laroslavskii Spasoproboinskiiobydennyi khram (Iaroslavl', 1869); in Vologda, Our God and Savior Jesus Christ (1654), S. A. Belokurov, “Skazanie “; in Viatka, Ekaterinskaia obydennaia tserkov' (late sixteenth-early seventeenth century), Zelenin, “'Obydennyia’ polotentsa,” p. 16.

5. A. S. Uvarov, “Materialy dlia arkheologicheskago slovaria,” Moskovskoe arkheologicheskoe obshchestvo. Trudy. Drevnosti, vol. 1, part 2 (Moscow, 1867), pp. 44-45, where Uvarov cites the dates when some of the Pskov and Novgorod votive churches were converted from wood into stone

6. Zelenin, “'Obydennyia'polotentsa,” p. 16.

7. Ibid., note 1.

8. Uvarov, “Materialy,” p. 44.

9. Ibid., p. 46.

10. Shrewsbury, J. F. D., The Plague of the Philistines (London, 1964), pp. 126–30 Google ScholarPubMed.

11. An excellent overview of major epidemics in the East Slavic world from the tenth through the late eighteenth centuries can be found in Alexander, John T.'s Bubonic Plague in Early Modern Russia: Public Health & Urban Disaster (Baltimore, 1980), pp. 11–35 Google Scholar. See also Grmek, Mirko Drazen, “Ancient Slavic Medicine” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 14, no. 1 (January 1959): 22Google ScholarPubMed.

12. Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, p. 12 Google Scholar. F. A. Derbek challenges this early date as too vague and inconclusive, preferring instead the year 1092 as marking the first deadly epidemic outbreak in Kiev ( Derbek, , Istoriia chumnykh epidemii v Rossii s osnovaniia gosudarstva do nastoiashchago vremeni [St. Petersburg, 1905], pp. 6–7 Google Scholar).

13. Abbreviated chronicle references to epidemics in Kievan Rus’ and Muscovy from the tenth through the early eighteenth centuries can be found in Zmeev, L. F., Byloe vrachebnoi Rossii, bk. 1 (St. Petersburg, 1890), pp. 1–30 Google Scholar.

14. Vasil'ev, K. G. and Segal, A. E., Istoriia epidemii v Rossii (Moscow, 1960), p. 28 Google Scholar. The salient arguments surrounding the origins of the Black Death in Russia can be found in Alexander, , Bubonic- Plague, pp. 12–Google Scholar.

15. Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, p. 14 Google Scholar; Lawrence N., Langer, “The Black Death in Russia: Its Effects Upon Urban Labor” Russian History, 2 (1975): 53-67Google Scholar.

16. Nasonov, , Pskovskie letopisi, 2:100-102Google Scholar; Nasonov, , Novgorodskaia pervaialetopis, pp. 362–Google Scholar.

17. Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, p. 14 Google Scholar.

18. Nasonov, , Pskovskie letopisi, 2:102Google Scholar.

19. Nasonov, , Novgorodskaia pervaia letopis, p. 367Google Scholar.

20. Derbek, , Istoriia chumnykh epidemii, pp. 23–Google Scholar.

21. Nasonov, , Novgorodskaia pervaia letopis, p. 383Google Scholar.

22. Ibid. See also Derbek (Istoriia chumnykh epidemii, p. 24, note 4) for an explanation of the apparent time lapse between the plague's first appearance in Pskov and Novgorod respectively.

23. PSRL, vol. 4, pt. 1: Novgorodskaia chetvertaia letopis', p. 368.

24. See notes 2 and 3 above for a listing of all the obydennye khramy recorded in the chronicles.

25. Derbek, , Istoriia chumnykh epidemii, pp. 24–Google Scholar.

26. Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, p. 16 Google Scholar.

27. Vasil'ev and Segal, Istoriia epidemii v Rossii, p. 42.

28. Nasonov, , Pskovskie letopisi, 2:102Google Scholar.

29. Ibid., p. 105.

30. PSRL, vol. 3: Novgorodskaia tret'ia letopis', p. 251.

31. Nasonov, , Pskovskie letopisi, 2:114-15Google Scholar.

32. Ibid., 1:46.

33. PSRL, vol. 3: Novgorodskaia tret'ia letopis', p. 249.

34. Belokurov, “Skazanie,” p. 15.

35. Ibid., p. IX; Uvarov, “Materialy,” p. 46.

36. For a detailed description of the 1654-57 epidemic, see Derbek, , Istoriia chumnykh epidemii, pp. 44–Google Scholar; see also Vasil'ev and Segal, Istoriia epidemii v Rossii, pp. 54–Google Scholar.

37. Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, pp. 17–18Google Scholar.

38. S. M., Shpilevskii, “O chume v Kazani pri tsarstvovanie Alekseia Mikhailovicha” Uchenye zapiski Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo universiteta, 2 (1879), pp. 76-78Google Scholar.

39. A. G., Brikner, “Chuma v Moskve v 1654 godu” Istoricheskii vestnik, 16 (April 1884): 5-22Google Scholar; Zviagintsev, E, “Chuma v Moskve v XVII i XVIII vv.” Istoricheskii zhurnal, 2 (1937): 52-59Google Scholar.

40. PSRL, vol. 31: Letopistsy poslednei chetverti XVIIv. (Moscow, 1968), p. 182.

41. Ibid.

42. Belokurov, “Skazanie,” p. 12. The sudden deaths can perhaps be explained by the presence of the rare but extremely deadly septicemic form of plague in Vologda and elsewhere in central Russia in 1654 ( Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, p. 19 Google Scholar).

43. Belokurov, “Skazanie,” p. 13.

44. Ibid., p. 15.

45. R. E. F. Smith has made the interesting, if unsubstantiated, observation that the rapid construction of the obydennye khramy was perhaps made possible because “the timbers gathered from the forest were prepared and probably numbered in advance” ( Smith, , Peasant Farming in Muscovy [Cambridge, 1977], p. 78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

46. Belokurov, “Skazanie,” p. 15.

47. Ibid., p. 16. Uvarov describes and gives the dimensions of the icon ( “Materialy,” p. 46).

48. Belokurov, “Skazanie,” p. 16.

49. Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, p. 18 Google Scholar.

50. Novombergskii, N. la., Material)'po istorii meditsiny v Rossii, vol. 4 (Tomsk, 1907), p. 166 Google Scholar.

51. Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, p. 19 Google Scholar.

52. Savvaitov, P, “Iz Vologdy” Moskvhianin, 2, no. 4 (1842): 547-8Google Scholar.

53. See note 5 above.

54. See note 4 above.

55. Zelenin, “'Obydennyia'polotentsa,” p. 19.

56. In some Ukrainian villages there had survived well into the mid-nineteenth century the custom of building one-day wooden “cholera crosses” during serious outbreaks of the disease. Evgenii Perfetskii believed that this Ukrainian custom of one-day wooden crosses sprang from a common ancient East Slavic obydennyi tradition (Perfetskii, “'Kholernye’ kresty,” Zhivaia starina, 24 [1915], appendix 3, p. 036 [sic]).

57. Zelenin, “’ Obydennyia’ polotentsa,” pp. 14-15.

58. Ibid., p. 20.

59. Belokurov, “Skazanie,” p. 16.

60. McNeill, William H., Plagues and Peoples (Garden City, N.Y., 1976), p. 170 Google Scholar.

61. Zmeev, , Byloe vrachebnoi Rusi, pp. 1–Google Scholar; Alexander, , Bubonic Plague, pp. 11–12Google Scholar; Derbek, , Istoriia chumnykh epidemii, pp. 6–Google Scholar.

62. V., Ekkerman, Material)/ dlia islorii meditsiny v Rossii: Istoriia epidemii X-XVIIIvv. (Kazan', 1884), p. 53 Google Scholar. In addition to Pskov and Novgorod, Polotsk and Smolensk also acted as primary conduits of epidemic disease into Russia.

63. Novombergskii, N. la., Vrachehnoe stroenie v do-Petrovskoi Rusi (Tomsk, 1907), p. 318 Google Scholar.

64. Ibid.

65. Ibid., p. 319.

66. Nasonov, , Pskovskie letopisi, 1:102Google Scholar.

67. Novombergskii, , Vrachebnoe stroenie, p. 319 Google Scholar.

68. PSRL, vol. 3: Novgorodskaia vtoraia letopis', p. 155.

69. Derbek, , Istoriia chumnykh epidemii, pp. 35, 38Google Scholar.

70. PSRL, vol. 3: Novgorodskaia tret'ia letopis', p. 251. This is the last recorded instance of a oneday votive church in the chronicles.

71. Only recently have scholars begun to explore some of the broader implications of the Black Death and its impact on Russia. In addition to Lawrence N. Langer's article “Black Death in Russia, “see Lawrence N. Langer, “Plague and the Russian Countryside: Monastic Estates in the Late Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries,” Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 10, no. 3 (Fall 1976): 351-68. A discussion of the possible sociopolitical consequences of the plague in Muscovy can be found in Gustave Alef s study, “The Crisis of the Muscovite Aristocracy: A Factor in the Growth of Monarchical Power, “ Forschungen zur osleuropaischen Geschichte, 15 (1970): 36-40.

72. The literature on the Black Death is extensive. A sample of recent scholarship on the impact of the Black Death on Europe can be found in Bowsky, William M., ed., The Black Death: A Turning Point in History? (New York, 1971 Google Scholar). See also John Norris's important article “East or West? The Geographic Origin of the Black Death,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 51, no. 1 (Spring 1977): 1-24. With reference to individual countries and regions, the following studies are available: Biraben, Jean-Noel, Les hommes et la peste en France el dans les pays europeens et mediterraneens, 2 vols. (Paris, 1975–76Google Scholar); Dols, Michael W., The Black Death in the Middle East (Princeton, 1977)Google ScholarPubMed; Shrewsbury, J. F. D., A History of Bubonic Plague in the British Isles (Cambridge, 1970)Google Scholar.

73. Recall the appeals of the people of Pskov to the hierarchy of Novgorod in 1352and 1360under similar circumstances.

74. Philip, Ziegler, The Black Death (New York, 1969), p. 41Google Scholar.

75. Ibid., p. 42.

76. Biraben, , Les hommes et la pesle, 2:70-74Google Scholar.

77. Ziegler, , Black Death, pp. 267–68Google Scholar. Among the more unusual religious responses to the plague in the West was the appearance of the so-called Brotherhood of the Flagellants or Bretheren of the Cross. The movement apparently originated in Eastern Europe, perhaps in Hungary. It took firm root in Germany, whence it spread between 1348 and 1350 to other countries (ibid., p. 88). The Flagellants, ranging in number from several hundred to a thousand at any given time, would enter a village or town, recite their prescribed litany in the local church, and then proceed to engage in collective flagellation in the market square or some public place. According to Ziegler, fear was the motive force behind the movement. While the Flagellants no doubt performed their painful, bizarre ritual in expiation for personal guilt, they did so also “in the hope that their sacrifice might induce God to lift from his people the curse that was destroying them” (ibid., p. 96).

78. Biraben, , Les hommes et la peste, 2: 75Google Scholar.

79. Raymond, Crawfurd, Plague and Pestilence in Literature and Art (Oxford, 1914), pp. 133–36 Google Scholar.

80. Millard, Meiss, Painting in Florence and Siena After the Black Death (Princeton, 1951), p. 70 Google Scholar.

81. Gaborit, Jean Rene, Great Gothic Sculpture, trans. Carole Speriiand Lucia Wildt (New York, 1978), pp. 73–76 Google Scholar.

82. Rice, Tamara Talbot, A Concise History of Russian Art (New York, 1963), pp. 114–20 Google Scholar.

83. In two of the standard works on Russian wooden architecture ( Krasovskii, M. V., Kurs istorii russkoi arkhitektury, pt. 1Google Scholar: Dereviannoe zodchestvo [St. Petersburg, 1916] and 1. Zabello, la., Russkoe dereviannoe zodchestvo [Moscow, 1942]Google Scholar), there is no mention of the one-day votive church.