Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:29:32.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The potential of the smoke-derived compound 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one as a priming agent for tomato seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

Neeru Jain  and
Johannes Van Staden
Neeru Jain
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
Johannes Van Staden*
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
*
*Correspondence: Fax: +27 33 260 5897 Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stimulatory role of 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one, a smoke-derived butenolide, on germination and post-germination events is well documented. Previous studies have involved germinating seeds in the continuous presence of the compound. However, commercial growers cannot exploit the potential of the butenolide for large-scale production of crops due to limited availability and environmental constraints. The present study was undertaken to assess the potential of the butenolide as a priming agent of tomato (Solanum esculentum Mill.) seeds. Flow cytometry data revealed that butenolide-primed seeds had a higher percentage of nuclei at the 4C stage than water-primed seeds. Emergence of the radicle was much faster in the primed seeds. After 36 h of imbibition, a higher percentage of the butenolide-primed seeds (22%) exhibited radicle emergence compared to the water-primed seeds (12%). While butenolide-primed seeds initially germinated more rapidly than either water-primed or unprimed seeds in a 48-h period, water-imbibed seeds reached a similar germination level as the butenolide-primed seeds by 60 h of incubation. The butenolide-primed seeds produced significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more vigorous seedlings than water-primed seeds or seeds in the continuous presence of either water or butenolide. A gradual decrease in the seedling vigour index was recorded for both water and butenolide-primed seeds with increased seed storage at room temperature. Nevertheless, the vigour index was significantly greater in the butenolide-primed seeds than the water-primed seeds. Vigour indices were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher for the butenolide-primed seeds under various stress conditions (salinity, osmoticum or temperature) compared to control or water-primed seeds. Results of the present study suggest that the butenolide is a good seed-priming agent. Additionally, primed seeds retained the promotive effect for a considerable time. This was also the case for tomato seeds under various simulated field stress conditions.

Keywords

butenolidegerminationpriming agentseed storageseedling vigoursmokeSolanum esculentumtomato
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 175 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarado, A.D.andBradford, K.J. (1988) Priming and storage of tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) seeds. I. Effects of storage temperature on germination rate and viability. Seed Science and Technology 16, 601–612.Google Scholar
Amzallag, G.N., Lerner, H.R.andPoljakoff-Mayber, A. (1990) Exogenous ABA as a modulator of the response of sorghum to high salinity. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1529–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arin, L.andKiyak, Y. (2003) The effects of pre-sowing treatments on emergence and seedling growth of tomato seed (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under several stress conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 6, 990–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, M.andFoolad, M.R. (2005) Pre-sowing seed treatment – a shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Advances in Agronomy 88, 223–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, M., Zafar, R.andAshraf, M.Y. (2003) Time-course changes in the inorganic and organic components of germinating sunflower achenes under salt (NaCl) stress. Flora 198, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, B.J.M.andVan Staden, J. (1994) Plant-derived smoke: an effective seed pre-treatment. Plant Growth Regulation 14, 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J.D.andBlack, M. (1982) Physiology and biochemistry of seeds. Viability, dormancy, and environmental control. Vol. 2. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bino, R.J., De Vries, J.N., Kraak, H.L.andVan Pijlen, J.G. (1992) Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in tomato seeds during priming and germination. Annals of Botany 69, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, C.M., Davison, P.A., Ashraf, M.andTaylor, R.M. (1989) Biochemical changes during osmopriming of leek seeds. Annals of Botany 63, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lange, J.H.andBoucher, C. (1990) Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). I. Plant-derived smoke as a seed germination cue. South African Journal of Botany 56, 700–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, I.andVan de Venter, H.A. (1999) The effect of priming treatments on the performance of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai) seeds under temperature and osmotic stress. Seed Science and Technology 27, 871–875.Google Scholar
Flematti, G.R., Ghisalberti, E.L., Dixon, K.W.andTrengove, R.D. (2004) A compound from smoke that promotes seed germination. Science 305, 977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frett, J.J.andPill, W.G. (1989) Germination characteristics of osmotically primed and stored impatiens seeds. Scientia Horticulturae 40, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frett, J.J., Pill, W.G.andMorneau, D.C. (1991) A comparison of priming agents for tomato and asparagus seeds. HortScience 26, 1158–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D.W., Harkins, K.R., Maddox, J.M., Aryes, N.M., Sharma, D.P.andFiroozabady, E. (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220, 1049–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garćia, F.C., Jiménez, L.F.andVázquez-Ramos, J.M. (1995) Biochemical and cytological studies on osmoprimed maize seeds. Seed Science Research 5, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurusinghe, S.H.andBradford, K.J. (2001) Galactosyl-sucrose oligosaccharides and potential longevity of primed seeds. Seed Science Research 11, 121–133.Google Scholar
Gurusinghe, S.H., Cheng, Z.andBradford, K.J. (1999) Cell cycle activity during seed priming is not essential for germination advancement in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydecker, W., Higgins, J.andGulliver, R.L. (1973) Accelerated germination by osmoticum treatment. Nature 246, 42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A.A. (1992) Preplant physiological seed conditioning. Horticultural Reviews 14, 131–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, M.G., Sparg, S.G., Light, M.E.andVan Staden, J. (2006) Stimulation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling vigour by smoke-water and butenolide. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 192, 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanteri, S., Saracco, F., Kraak, H.L.andBino, R.J. (1994) The effects of priming on nuclear replication activity and germination of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seeds. Seed Science Research 4, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, M.E.andVan Staden, J. (2004) The potential of smoke in seed technology. South African Journal of Botany 70, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, D.J., Kristiansen, M., Flematti, G.R., Turner, S.R., Ghisalberti, E.L., Trengove, R.D.andDixon, K.W. (2006) Effects of a butenolide present in smoke on light-mediated germination of Australian Asteraceae. Seed Science Research 16, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, B.E.andKaufmann, M.R. (1973) The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology 51, 914–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oluoch, M.O.andWelbaum, G.E. (1996) Effect of postharvest washing and post-storage priming on viability and vigour of six-year-old muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) seeds from eight stages of development. Seed Science and Technology 24, 195–209.Google Scholar
Ozbingol, N., Corbineau, F.andCôme, D. (1998) Response of tomato seeds to osmoconditioning as related to temperature and oxygen. Seed Science Research 8, 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passam, H.C.andKakouriotis, D. (1994) The effects of osmoconditioning on the germination, emergence and early plant growth of cucumber under saline conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 57, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfearn, M.andOsborne, D.J. (1997) Effects of advancement on nucleic acids in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) seeds. Seed Science Research 7, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, G. (1993) Multinational and national competition for water in the Middle East: Towards the deepening crisis. Journal of Environmental Management 39, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schipper, J., van der Toorn, P.andBruggink, T. (2001) Process for prolonging shelf-life of primed nongerminated seeds. US Patent No. 6,313,3771 B1.Google Scholar
Sung, J.M.andChiu, K.Y. (1995) Hydration effect on seedling emergence strength of watermelon seeds differing in ploidy. Plant Science 110, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A.G., Allen, P.S., Bennett, M.A., Bradford, K.J., Burris, J.S.andMisra, M.K. (1998) Seed enhancements. Seed Science Research 8, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Staden, J., Jäger, A.K., Light, M.E.andBurger, B.V. (2004) Isolation of the major germination cue from plant-derived smoke. South African Journal of Botany 70, 654–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Staden, J., Sparg, S.G., Kulkarni, M.G.andLight, M.E. (2006) Post-germination effects of the smoke-derived compound 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one, and its potential as a preconditioning agent. Field Crops Research 98, 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar