Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:55:46.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new procedure for making observations of embryo morphology in dust-like seeds with rigid coats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Clara de Vega*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1095, 41080-Sevilla, Spain
Renata Carmo de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Institute de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Caixa Postal 593, Uberlândia, MG, 38400-902, Brazil
*
*Correspondence: Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Observing the embryo in dust-like seeds with a rigid coat presents a particular challenge, because it is not possible to use conventional techniques applied to normal-sized seeds. A new combination of softening and clearing techniques, which is remarkably effective for direct observations of embryos in minute seeds, is reported here. Moreover, no special seed treatment is required prior to application of this combination of techniques, and good results are obtained from living and preserved material. Dust-like seeds of Cytinus hypocistis and Cytinus ruber with a rigid coat were treated successively with Franklin's and with Jeffrey's softening fluids, and then with Herr's clearing fluid. The combined action of the two softening fluids caused sufficient seed coat rupture to allow Herr's fluid to clear seed tissues, permitting effective observation of the embryo. This technique should be applicable to a wide range of species with dust-like seeds, and its possibilities for biological studies are numerous.

Type
In Brief
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boone, L.S., Fate, G., Chang, M. and Lynn, D.G. (1995) Seed germination. pp. 1438 in Press, M.; Graves, J. (Eds) Parasitic plants. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Bouman, F. and Meijer, W. (1994) Comparative structure of ovules and seeds in Rafflesiaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 193, 187212.Google Scholar
Chaffey, N., Cholewa, E., Regan, S. and Sundberg, B. (2002) Secondary xylem development in Arabidopsis: A model for wood formation. Physiologia Plantarum 114, 594600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czakó, M., Jang, J.C., Herr, J.M. and Marton, L. (1992) Differential manifestation of seed mortality induced by seed specific expression of the gene for diphtheria toxin A chain in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Molecular and General Genetics 235, 3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, L.H., Nias, J. and Briun, A. (1991) The fruit and consumers of Rafflesia keithii (Rafflesiaceae). Biotropica 23, 191199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, T. and Fries, A. (2004) Genetic analysis of fibre size in a full-sib Pinus sylvestris L. progeny test. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19, 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferdy, J.B., Loriot, S., Sandmeier, M., Lefranc, M. and Raquin, C. (2001) Inbreeding depression in a rare deceptive orchid. Canadian Journal of Botany 79, 11811188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, G.L. (1945) Preparation of thin sections of synthetic resins and wood-resin composites, and a new macerating method for wood. Nature 155, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Franco, J.G. and Rico-Gray, V. (1997) Dispersal, viability, germination and seed bank of Bdallophyton bambusarum (Rafflesiaceae) in the coast of Veracruz, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical 45, 8794.Google Scholar
Gleiser, G., Picher, M.C., Veintimilla, P., Martínez, J. and Verdú, M. (2004) Seed dormancy in relation to seed storage behaviour in Acer. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145, 203208.Google Scholar
Gómez, L.D. (1983) Rafflesiaceae. pp. 89–93 in Burger, W. (Ed.) Flora Costaricensis. Fieldiana Botanica II. Chicago, Illinois, Field Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
González, F. and Rudall, P.J. (2003) Structure and development of the ovule and seed in Aristolochiaceae, with particular reference to Saruma. Plant Systematics and Evolution 241, 223244.Google Scholar
Guzowska, I. (1964) Reinvestigation of embryo sac development, fertilization and early embryogeny in Cytinus hypocistis L. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 33, 157–166.Google Scholar
Heo, K., Kimoto, Y., Riveros, M. and Tobe, H. (2004) Embryology of Gomortegaceae (Laurales): Characteristics and character evolution. Journal of Plant Research 117, 221228.Google Scholar
Herr, J.M. (1971) A new clearing-squash technique for the study of ovule development in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 58, 785790.Google Scholar
Jersáková, J. and Johnson, S.D. (2006) Lack of floral nectar reduces self-pollination in a fly-pollinated orchid. Oecologia 147, 60–68.Google Scholar
Johansen, D.A. (1940) Plant microtechnique. New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.D. (2000) Batesian mimicry in the non-rewarding orchid Disa pulchra, and its consequences for pollinator behaviour. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71, 119132.Google Scholar
Kebreab, E. and Murdoch, A.J. (1999) Effect of temperature and humidity on the longevity of Orobanche seeds. Weed Research 39, 199211.Google Scholar
Kostiainen, K., Jalkanen, H., Kaakinen, S., Saranpaa, P. and Vapaavuori, E. (2006) Wood properties of two silver birch clones exposed to elevated CO2 and O3. Global Change Biology 12, 12301240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, J.E. and Arduin, M. (1997) Manual básico de métodos em morfologia vegetal. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, EDUR.Google Scholar
Kuijt, J. (1969) The biology of parasitic flowering plants. Berkeley, California, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lennartsson, T., Oostermeijer, J.G.B., Van Dijk, J. and den Nijs, H.C.M. (2000) Ecological significance and heritability of floral reproductive traits in Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Basic and Applied Ecology 1, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matusova, R., Van Mourik, T. and Bouwmeester, H.J. (2004) Changes in the sensitivity of parasitic weed seeds to germination stimulants. Seed Science Research 14, 335344.Google Scholar
Noland, T.L., Parker, W.C. and Morneault, A.E. (2006) Natural variation in seed characteristics of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). New Forests 32, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W.C., Noland, T.L. and Morneault, A.E. (2006) The effects of seed mass on germination, seedling emergence, and early seedling growth of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). New Forests 32, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponzi, R. and Pizzolongo, P. (1982) Cytinus hypocistis L. embryogenesis: Some biological and ultrastuctural aspects of fertilization and embryo development. Giornale Botanico Italiano 116, 149166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajora, O.P., Mosseler, A. and Major, J.E. (2002) Mating system and reproductive fitness traits of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in large, central versus small, isolated, marginal populations. Canadian Journal of Botany 80, 11731184.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H.N. (1995) Terrestrial orchids: From seed to mycotrophic plant. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E.L. and Carlquist, S. (1997) SEM studies on vessels in ferns. III. Phlebodium and Polystichum. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, A. (2006) Pollinator limitation and inbreeding depression in orchid species with and without nectar rewards. New Phytologist 169, 419430.Google Scholar
Tigabu, M. and Odén, P.C. (2003) Discrimination of viable and empty seeds of Pinus patula Schiede & Deppe with near-infrared spectroscopy. New Forests 25, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L.E. (2003) The cost of inbreeding in Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 90, 235242.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Dong, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y.S., Wu, W.H., Deng, X.W. and Xue, Y.B. (2004) Genome-wide analyses of S-Locus F-box-like genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Molecular Biology 56, 929945.Google Scholar