Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:57:48.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A hydrothermal after-ripening time model for seed dormancy loss in Bromus tectorum L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Necia B. Bair ,
Susan E. Meyer  and
Phil S. Allen
Necia B. Bair
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
Susan E. Meyer
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, UT 84606, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After-ripening, the loss of dormancy under dry conditions, is associated with a decrease in mean base water potential for germination of Bromus tectorum L. seeds. After-ripening rate is a linear function of temperature above a base temperature, so that dormancy loss can be quantified using a thermal after-ripening time (TAR) model. To incorporate storage water potential into TAR, we created a hydrothermal after-ripening time (HTAR) model. Seeds from two B. tectorum populations were stored under controlled temperatures (20 or 30 °C) and water potentials (−400 to −40 MPa). Subsamples were periodically removed from each storage treatment and incubated at 15 or 25 °C to determine germination time courses. Dormancy status (mean base water potential) was calculated from each time course using hydrothermal time equations developed for each seed collection. Seeds stored at −400 MPa did not after-ripen. At water potentials from −400 to −150 MPa, the rate of after-ripening increased approximately linearly with increasing water potential. Between −150 and −80 MPa, there was no further increase in after-ripening rate, while at −40 MPa seeds did not after-ripen and showed loss of vigour. These results suggest that the concept of critical water potential thresholds, previously shown to be associated with metabolic activity and desiccation damage in partially hydrated seeds, is also relevant to the process of after-ripening. The HTAR model generally improved field predictions of dormancy loss when the soil was very dry. Reduced after-ripening rate under such conditions provides an ecologically relevant explanation of how seeds prolong dormancy at high summer soil temperatures.

Keywords

after-ripeningBromus tectorumdormancy losshydrothermal after-ripening timehydrothermal timemodellingwater potential
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 17 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, P. (2003) When and how many? Hydrothermal models and the prediction of seed germination. New Phytologist 158, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, P.S., Thorne, E.T., Gardner, J.S. and White, D.B. (2000) Is the barley endosperm a water reservoir for the embryo when germinating seeds are dried?. International Journal of Plant Science 161, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarado, V. and Bradford, K.J. (2002) A hydrothermal time model explains the cardinal temperatures for seed germination. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 1061–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bair, N.B. (2004) A hydrothermal after-ripening time model of seed dormancy loss in Bromus tectorum. MS Thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Bauer, M.C., Meyer, S.E. and Allen, P.S. (1998) A simulation model to predict seed dormancy loss in the field for Bromus tectorum L. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 1235–1244.Google Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (1990) A water relations analysis of seed germination rates. Plant Physiology 94, 840–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, K.J. (1995) Water relations in seed germination. pp. 351–396. in Kigel, J.;, Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (2002) Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modeling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Science 50, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (2005) Threshold models applied to seed germination ecology. New Phytologist 165, 338–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, M., Meyer, S.E. and Allen, P.S. (1996) A hydrothermal time model of seed after-ripening in Bromus tectorum L. Seed Science Research 6, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, L.O. and McDonald, M.B. (2001) Principles of seed science and technology (4th edition) Boston, Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1980) Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality Seed production 605–635. Hebblethwaite P.B. London Butterworth and CoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1981) The quantification of aging and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Science and Technology 9, 373–409.Google Scholar
Foley, M.E. (1994) Temperature and water status of seed affect afterripening in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Science 42, 200–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forney, C.F. and Brandl, D.G. (1992) Control of humidity in small controlled-environment chambers using glycerol-water solutions. HortTechnology 2, 52–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummerson, R.J. (1986) The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, R.J. (1992) Applied soil physics. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardegree, S.P., Van Vactor, S.S., Pierson, F.B. and Palmquist, D.E. (1999) Predicting variable-temperature response of non-dormant seeds from constant-temperature germination data. Journal of Range Management 52, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebreab, E. and Murdoch, A.J. (1999) Modelling the effects of water stress and temperature on germination rate of Orobanche aegyptiaca seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A.C. and Vertucci, C.W. (1989) Moisture as a regulator of physiological reaction in seeds. pp. 51–67. in Stanwood, P.C.;, McDonald, M.B. (Eds) Seed moisture. Special publication 14. Madison, Wisconsin, Crop Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Leopold, A.C., Glenister, R. and Cohn, M.A. (1988) Relationship between water content and afterripening in red rice. Physiologia Plantarum 74, 659–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R.N. (1981) Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into Western North America: An ecological chronicle. Agro-Ecosystems 7, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, S.E., Debaene-Gill, S.B. and Allen, P.S. (2000) Using hydrothermal time concepts to model seed germination response to temperature, dormancy loss, and priming effects in Elymus elymoides. Seed Science Research 10, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, B.E. (1983) Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiology 72, 66–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, K., Finch-and Savage, W.E. (1997) A statistical perspective on threshold type germination models. pp. 361–368. in Ellis, R.H., Black, M., Murdoch, A.J., Hong, T.D. (Eds) Basic and applied aspects of seed biology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowse, H.R. and Finch-Savage, W.E. (2003) Hydrothermal threshold models can describe the germination response of carrot (Daucus carota) and onion (Allium cepa) seed populations across both sub- and supra-optimal temperatures. New Phytologist 158, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M.J.T. and Schneider, A.S. (1972) Water in biological membranes: adsorption isotherms and circular dichroism as a function of hydration. Journal of Membrane Biology 9, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrestha, A., Roman, E.S., Thomas, A.G. and Swanton, C.J. (1999) Modeling germination and shoot-radicle elongation of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Weed Science 47, 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steadman, K.J., Crawford, A.D. and Gallagher, R.S. (2003) Dormancy release in Lolium rigidum seeds is a function of thermal after-ripening time and seed water content. Functional Plant Biology 30, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vertucci, C.W. and Farrant, J.M. (1995) Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. pp. 237–271. in Kigel, J.;, Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Deckker.Google Scholar
Walters, C. (1998) Understanding the mechanisms and kinetics of seed aging. Seed Science Research 8, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, C., Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P. and Crane, J. (2001) Desiccation damage, accelerated ageing and respiration in desiccation tolerant and sensitive seeds. Seed Science Research 11, 135–148.Google Scholar
Winston, P.W. and Bates, D.H. (1960) Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41, 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar