Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:57:33.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Germination rates of Solanum sisymbriifolium: temperature response models, effects of temperature fluctuations and soil water potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

B.G.H. Timmermans*
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Ecology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. Vos
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Ecology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. van Nieuwburg
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Ecology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
T.J. Stomph
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Ecology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
P.E.L. van der Putten
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Ecology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Correspondence Fax: +31 343 515611 Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Four temperature response models were compared describing the emergence rate of Solanum sisymbriifolium (L.) over a broad range of suboptimal temperatures and at different soil water potentials. In the laboratory, the effects were tested on germination rates at constant (9.1–21.8°C) and diurnally fluctuating temperatures at different soil water potentials. Linear, Q10, expolinear and quadratic models were fitted to the data on rate of emergence against temperature. For model validation, field emergence was monitored in 11 sowings conducted in 2001–2004. Emergence rate increased with temperature and was relatively high at soil water potentials in the range of − 0.21 MPa to − 2.6 × 10− 3 MPa, but was almost zero at − 0.96 MPa and − 1.8 × 10− 3 MPa. Diurnal temperature fluctuations did not have a differing influence on germination rates or final germination percentages compared with constant temperatures. The expolinear and the quadratic models were most accurate in explaining variation of laboratory data, especially at temperatures close to the minimum germination temperature of S. sisymbriifolium. These two models had root mean square errors for predicting field emergence rates (5.9 to 38.4 d) of 0.81 and 0.87 d, respectively, and were considered more appropriate to predict the time to 50% germination for crops grown in conditions near their ‘base temperature’ than the widely used linear temperature (thermal time) models. The Gompertz function was fitted to percentage germination versus the time-accumulated germination rate (using the expolinear function to describe the rate–temperature relation). This combined model adequately predicted the temporal pattern of emergence in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, P. (2003) When and how many? Hydrothermal models and the prediction of seed germination. New Phytologist 158, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarado, V.andBradford, K.J. (2002) A hydrothermal time model explains the cardinal temperatures for seed germination. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 10611069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernaerts, K., Versyck, K.J.andVan Impe, J.F. (2000) On the design of optimal dynamic experiments for parameter estimation of a Ratkowsky-type growth kinetics at suboptimal temperatures. International Journal of Food Microbiology 54, 2738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covell, S., Ellis, R.H., Roberts, E.H.andSummerfield, R.J. (1986) The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in grain legumes I. A comparison of chickpea, lentil, soyabean and cowpea at constant temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 705715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E. (2004) The use of population-based threshold models to describe and predict the effects of seedbed environment on germination and seedling emergence of crops. pp. 5196in Benech-Arnold, R.L.; Sánchez, R.A. (Eds) Handbook of seed physiology: Applications to agriculture. New York, Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E., Steckel, J.R.A.andPhelps, K. (1998) Germination and post-germination growth to carrot seedling emergence: predictive threshold models and sources of variation between sowing occasions. New Phytologist 139, 505516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudriaan, J.andMonteith, J.L. (1990) A mathematical function for crop growth based on light interception and leaf area expansion. Annals of Botany 66, 695701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, A.C., Phelps, K., Reader, R.J.andBurston, S. (2000) Modelling the germination of Stellaria media using the concept of hydrothermal time. New Phytologist 148, 433444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardegree, S.P. (2006) Predicting germination response to temperature I. Cardinal-temperature models and sub-population specific regression. Annals of Botany 97, 11151125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holshouser, D.L., Chandler, J.M.andWu, H-I. (1996) Temperature-dependent model for non-dormant seed germination and rhizome bud break of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Science 44, 257265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jame, Y.W.andCutforth, H.W. (2004) Simulating the effects of temperature and seeding depth on germination and emergence of spring wheat. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 124, 207218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, I.R.andThornley, J.H.M. (1985) Temperature dependence of plant and crop processes. Annals of Botany 55, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebreab, E.andMurdoch, A.J. (1999a) Modelling the effects of water stress and temperature on germination rate of Orobanche aegyptiaca seeds. Journal of Experimantal Botany 50, 655664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebreab, E.andMurdoch, A.J. (1999b) A model of the effects of a wide range of constant and alternating temperatures on seed germination of four Orobanche species. Annals of Botany 84, 549557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S.U., Bailly, C., Côme, D.andCorbineau, F. (2004) Use of the hydrothermal time model to analyse interacting effects of water and temperature on germination of three grass species. Seed Science Research 14, 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.H., Goudriaan, J.andChalla, H. (2003) Using the expolinear growth equation for modelling crop growth in year-round cut chrysanthemum. Annals of Botany 92, 697708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdoch, A.J., Roberts, E.H.andGoedert, C.O. (1989) A model for germination responses to alternating temperatures. Annals of Botany 63, 97111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, D.A., Olley, J., McMeekin, T.A.andBall, A. (1982) Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. Journal of Bacteriology 149, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, J.A., Sanchez, J.J.andGoodman, M.M. (1998) Base temperature and heat unit requirement of 49 Mexican maize races. Maydica 43, 277282.Google Scholar
Scholte, K. (2000a) Effect of potato used as a trap crop on potato cyst nematodes and other soil pathogens and on the growth of a subsequent main potato crop. Annals of Applied Biology 136, 229238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, K. (2000b) Screening of non-tuber bearing Solanaceae for resistance to and induction of juvenile hatch of potato cyst nematodes and their potential for trap cropping. Annals of Applied Biology 136, 239246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, K. (2000c) Growth and development of plants with potential for use as trap crops for potato cyst nematodes and their effects on the number of juveniles in cysts. Annals of Applied Biology 137, 3142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, K.andVos, J. (2000) Effects of potential trap crops and planting date on soil infestation with potato cyst nematodes and root-knot nematodes. Annals of Applied Biology 137, 153164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sié, M., Dingkuhn, M., Wopereis, M.C.S.andMiezan, K.M. (1998) Rice crop duration and leaf appearance rate in a variable thermal environment II. Comparison of genotypes. Fields Crops Research 58, 129140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmaus, S.J., Prather, T.S.andHolt, J.S. (2000) Estimation of base temperatures for nine weed species. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 275286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmermans, B.G.H. (2005) Solanum sisymbriifolium (Lam.): A trap crop for potato cyst nematodes. PhD thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Timmermans, B.G.H., Vos, J., Stomph, T.J., Van Nieuwburg, J.andVan der Putten, P.E.L. (2006) Growth duration and root length density of Solanum sisymbriifolium (Lam.) as determinants of hatching of Globodera pallida (Stone). Annals of Applied Biology 148, 213222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, B.G.H., Vos, J., Van Nieuwburg, J., Stomph, T.J., Van der Putten, P.E.L.andMolendijk, L.P.G. (2007a) Field performance of Solanum sisymbriifolium, a trap crop for potato cyst nematodes. I. Dry matter accumulation in relation to sowing time, location, season and plant density. Annals of Applied Biology 150, 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, B.G.H., Vos, J., Stomph, T.J., Van Nieuwburg, J.andVan der Putten, P.E.L. (2007b) Field performance of Solanum sisymbriifolium, a trap crop for potato cyst nematodes. II. Root characteristics. Annals of Applied Biology 150, 99106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipton, J.L. (1984) Evaluation of three growth curve models for germination data analysis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 109, 451454.Google Scholar
Trudgill, D.L., Squire, G.R.andThompson, K. (2000) A thermal time basis for comparing the germination requirements of some British herbaceous plants. New Phytologist 145, 107114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, W.R. (1971) Role of temperature in the regulation of leaf extension in Zea mays. Nature 229, 4647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, X., Kropff, M.J., McLaren, G.andVisperas, R.M. (1995) A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 77, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar