Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:35:10.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of partial drying on seed germination in the aquatic grasses Zizania palustris L. and Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

C. D. Aldridge
Affiliation:
Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6TN, UK
R. J. Probert*
Affiliation:
Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6TN, UK
*
* Correspondence

Abstract

Partial drying of non-dormant seeds had little effect on germination behaviour compared with undried controls. In contrast, partial drying resulted in a marked increase in the germination response of freshly harvested (dormant) seeds of Z. palustris. Partial drying also resulted in a 100-fold reduction in the concentration of gibberellins (GA4+7) required for maximum germination. Although the concentration range of applied abscisic acid (ABA) that permitted germination was unaltered, partial drying increased the final germination percentage at all concentrations tested. The concentration of ABA above which germination was reduced in freshly harvested (dormant) seeds of Z. palustris was 3.16 × 10−7m compared with 10−4m in fresh (non-dormant) seeds of P. coarctata. Changes in the germination response of Z. palustris seeds to applied growth regulators, following partial drying or cold stratification might be explained by similar changes in hormonal status.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, K.A., Oelke, E.A. and Brenner, M.L. (1979) Abscisicacid levels in the grain of wild rice. Crop Science 19, 671676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldridge, C.D. (1991) Physiological studies on desiccation intolerance in propagules of aquatic grasses. PhD thesis, Reading University, UK.Google Scholar
Berjak, P., Dini, M. and Pammenter, N.W. (1984) Possible mechanisms underlying the differing dehydration responses in recalcitrant and orthodox seeds: desiccation-associated subcellular changes in propagules of Avicenia marina. Seed Science and Technology 12, 365384.Google Scholar
Berjak, P., Farrant, J.M., Mycock, D.J. and Pammenter, N.W. (1990) Recalcitrant (homoiohydrous) seeds: the enigma of their desiccation-sensitivity. Seed Science and Technology 18, 297310.Google Scholar
Bewley, J.D. (1979) Physiological aspects of desiccation tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 30,195238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J.D., Kermode, A.R. and Misra, S. (1989) Desiccation and minimal drying treatments of seeds of castor bean and Phaseolus vulgaris which terminate development and promote germination cause changes in protein and messengerRNA synthesis. Annals of Botany 63, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1991) Involvement of ABA in the physiology of developing and mature seeds. pp. 99124 in Davies, W.J., and Jones, H.G. (Eds) Abscisic acid physiology and biochemistry. Environmental Plant Biology Series, Oxford, Bios Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Bouwmeester, H.J. (1990) The effect of environmental conditions on the seasonal dormancy pattern and germination of weed seeds. PhD thesis. Agricultural University, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hong, T.D. and Ellis, R.H. (1990) A comparison of maturation drying, germination, and desiccation tolerance between developing seeds of Acer pseudoplatanus L. and Acer platanoides L. New Phytologist 116, 589596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Seed Testing Association (1985) International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology 13,299355.Google Scholar
Karssen, C.M. (1982) Seasonal patterns of dormancy in weed seeds. pp. 243270 in Khan, A.A. (Ed.) The physiology and biochemistry of seed development, dormancy and germination. Amsterdam,Elsevier Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Karssen, C.M., Zagorski, S., Kepczynski, J. and Groot, S.P.C. (1989) Key role for endogenous gibberellins in the control of seed germination. Annals of Botany 63, 7181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermode, A.R. (1990) Regulatory mechanisms involved in the transition from seed development to germination. CRC Critical Review of Plant Science 9, 155195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermode, A.R., Bewley, J.D., Dasgupta, J. and Misra, S. (1986) The transition from seed development to germination: a key role for desiccation? Horticultural Science (special supplement) 21, 11131118.Google Scholar
Kovach, D.A. and Bradford, K.J. (1992) Imbibitional damage anddesiccation tolerance of wild rice (Zizania palustris) seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 43, 747757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C.F., Moffatt, J.M., Sears, R.G. and Paulsen, G.M. (1989) Seed dormancy and responses of caryopses, embryos and calli to abscisic acid in wheat. Plant Physiology 90 643647.Google Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Farrant, J.M. and Berjak, P. (1984) Recalcitrant seeds: short-term storage effects in Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. may be germination-associated. Annals of Botany 54, 843846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, R.J. and Brierley, E.R. (1989) Desiccation intolerance in seeds of Zizania palustris is not related to developmental age or the duration of post-harvest storage. Annals of Botany 64, 669674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, R.J. and Longley, P.L. (1989) Recalcitrant seed storage physiology in three aquatic grasses (Zizania palustris, Spartina anglicaand Porteresia coarctata). Annals of Botany 63, 5363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, J.A., Sen Mandi, S. and Osborne, D.J. (1981) The loss of desiccation tolerance during germination: an ultrastructural and biochemical approach. Protoplasma 105,225239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker-Simmons, M (1987) ABA levels and sensitivity in developing wheat embryos of sprouting resistant and susceptible cultivars. Plant Physiology 84,6166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed