Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:53:56.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Desiccation sensitivity of excised embryonic axes of selected amaryllid species†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Sershen ,
Patricia Berjak  and
Norman W. Pammenter
Sershen
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4041South Africa
Patricia Berjak
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4041South Africa
Norman W. Pammenter*
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4041South Africa
*
*Correspondence Fax: +27 31 260 1195 Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study assessed the desiccation sensitivity of the excised embryonic axes of the following Amaryllidaceae species: Scadoxus puniceus, Amaryllis belladonna, Nerine huttoniae, N. humulus, N. bowdenii, N. filifolia, Haemanthus humulus humulus, H. coccineus, H. deformis, H. bakerae, Brunsvigia gregaria, Brunsvigia orientalis, Boophane disticha, Strumaria discifera, Crinum macowanii and C. bulbispermum. Excised embryonic axes were rapidly dehydrated (flash-dried). Curves of water content (g g− 1) and viability (%) versus drying time (min) were used to interpolate the water content (WC) and drying time (DT) values corresponding to 80% viability (WC/DT, V = 80) for individual species, and used to compare desiccation sensitivity between developmental stages and among years, provenances, species and genera. The seeds of all 16 species were shed with high axis water contents (2.25 ± 1.34 to 6.95 ± 0.89 g g− 1) and were sensitive to desiccation, with WC V = 80 values ranging from 0.13 to 3.15 g g− 1. Germination in amaryllids is unusual in that part of the cotyledon, to which the embryonic axis is attached, grows right out of the seed. It is at this stage that the axes were found to be more desiccation-sensitive in six out of nine species investigated. Seed fresh mass (SFM), axis shedding water content (SWC) and the degree of desiccation sensitivity were species characteristic. SWC, SFM and drying time were not significantly related to desiccation sensitivity. Parent plants were not confined to any particular biome type, occurring in areas characterized by seasonal dry spells. Parent plant habitat and seed characteristics were not useful in predicting the degree of desiccation sensitivity across species belonging to the same family.

Keywords

Amaryllidaceaedesiccation sensitivitydrying timeembryonic axesrecalcitrant seeds
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Presented at the Fifth International Workshop, Desiccation Tolerance and Sensitivity of Seeds and Vegetative Plant Tissues, Drakensberg, South Africa, 14–21 January 2007.

 

References

Berjak, P. and Pammenter, N.W. (1997) Progress in the understanding and manipulation of desiccation-sensitive (recalcitrant) seeds. pp. 689–703in Ellis, R.H.; Black, M.; Murdoch, A.J.; Hong, T.D. (Eds) Basic and applied aspects of seed biology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berjak, P. and Pammenter, N.W. (2004) Recalcitrant seeds. pp. 305–345in Benech-Arnold, R.L.; Sánchez, R.A. (Eds) Handbook of seed physiology. Applications to agriculture. New York, Food Product Press and Haworth Reference Press.Google Scholar
Berjak, P., Farrant, J.M. and Pammenter, N.W. (1989) The basis of recalcitrant seed behaviour: Cell biology of the homoiohydrous seed condition. pp. 89–108in Taylorson, R.B. (Ed.) Recent advances in the development and germination of seeds. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berjak, P., Farrant, J.M., Mycock, D.J. and Pammenter, N.W. (1990) Recalcitrant (homoiohydrous) seeds: the enigma of their desiccation sensitivity. Seed Science and Technology 18, 297–310.Google Scholar
Berjak, P., Pammenter, N.W. and Vertucci, C.W. (1992) Homoiohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: developmental status, desiccation sensitivity and state of water in axes of Landolphia kirkii Dyer. Planta 186, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berjak, P., Mycock, D.J., Wesley-Smith, J., Dumet, D. and Watt, M.P. (1996) Strategies of in vitro conservation of hydrated germplasm. pp. 18–28in Normah, M.N.; Narimah, M.K.; Clyde, M.M. (Eds) In vitro conservation of plant genetic resources. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Percetakan Watan, SDN. BDH.Google Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (1995) Water relations in seed germination. pp. 351–396in Kigel, J.; Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Chin, H.F. (1978) Production and storage of recalcitrant seeds in the tropics. Acta Horticulturae 83, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, H.F. and Roberts, E.H. (1980) Recalcitrant crop seeds. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tropical Press, SDN. BHD.Google Scholar
Connor, K.F., Bonner, F.T. and Vozzo, J.A. (1996) Effects of desiccation on temperate recalcitrant seeds: differential scanning calorimetry, gas chromatography, electron microscopy, and moisture studies on Quercus nigra and Quercus alba. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26, 1813–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daws, M.I., Gaméné, C.S., Glidewell, S.M. and Pritchard, H.W. (2004a) Seed mass variation potentially masks a single critical water content in recalcitrant seeds. Seed Science Research 14, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daws, M.I., Lydall, E., Chmielarz, P., Leprince, O., Matthews, S., Thanos, C.A. and Pritchard, H.W. (2004b) Developmental heat sum influences recalcitrant seed traits in Aesculus hippocastanum across Europe. New Phytologist 162, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daws, M.I., Garwood, N.C. and Pritchard, H.W. (2005) Traits of recalcitrant seeds in a semi-deciduous tropical forest in Panamá: Some ecological implications. Functional Ecology 19, 874–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daws, M.I., Garwood, N.C. and Pritchard, H.W. (2006a) Prediction of desiccation sensitivity in seeds of woody species: a probabilistic model based on two seed traits and 104 species. Annals of Botany 97, 667–674.Google Scholar
Daws, M.I., Cleland, H., Chmielarz, P., Gorian, F., Leprince, O., Mullins, C.E., Thanos, C.A., Vandvik, V. and Pritchard, H.W. (2006b) Variable desiccation tolerance in Acer pseudoplatanus seeds in relation to developmental conditions: a case of phenotypic recalcitrance? Functional Plant Biology 33, 1–8.Google Scholar
Dickie, J.B. and Pritchard, H.W. (2002) Systematic and evolutionary aspects of desiccation tolerance in seeds. pp. 239–259in Black, M.; Pritchard, H.W. (Eds) Desiccation and survival in plants: Drying without dying. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussert, S., Chabrillange, N., Engelmann, F., Anthony, F., Louarn, J. and Hamon, S. (2000) Relationship between seed desiccation sensitivity, seed water content at maturity and climatic characteristics of native environments of nine Coffea L. species. Seed Science Research 10, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1989) Germination-associated events and the desiccation sensitivity of recalcitrant seeds: a study on three unrelated species. Planta 178, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E. (1992) Seed development in the recalcitrant species Quercus robur L.: germinability and desiccation tolerance. Seed Science Research 2, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E. (1996) The role of developmental studies in research on recalcitrant and intermediate seeds. pp. 83–97in Ouédraogo, A.-S.; Poulsen, K.; Stubsgaard, F. (Eds) Intermediate/recalcitrant tropical forest tree seeds. Rome, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E., Blake, P.S. and Clay, H.A. (1996) Desiccation stress in recalcitrant Quercus robur L. seeds results in lipid peroxidation and increased synthesis of jasmonates and abscisic acid. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, J.R., Jin, J.P., Peng, Y.F. and Xia, Q.H. (1994) Desiccation tolerance in two species with recalcitrant seeds: Clausena lansium (Lour.) and Litchi chinensis (Sonn.). Seed Science Research 4, 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaméné, S., Pritchard, H.W. and Harris, C. (1999) The project on handling and storage of recalcitrant and intermediate tropical forest tree seeds. Danida Forest Seed Centre Newsletter 5, 15–16.Google Scholar
Hong, T.D. and Ellis, R.H. (1990) A comparison of maturation drying, germination and desiccation tolerance between developing seeds of Acer pseudoplatanus L. and Acer platanoides L. New Phytologist 116, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, T.D. and Ellis, R.H. (1996) A protocol to determine seed storage behaviour. Rome, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Hong, T.D. and Ellis, R.H. (1998) Contrasting seed storage behaviour among different species of Meliaceae. Seed Science and Technology 26, 77–95.Google Scholar
Hong, T.D., Linington, S. and Ellis, R.H. (1996) Handbooks for genebanks. No. 4. Rome, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Liang, Y.H. and Sun, W.Q. (2002) Rate of dehydration and cumulative desiccation stress interacted to modulate desiccation tolerance of recalcitrant cocoa and ginkgo embryonic tissues. Plant Physiology 128, 1323–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473–497.Google Scholar
Murdoch, A.J. and Ellis, R.H. (2000) Dormancy, viability and longevity. pp. 183–214in Fenner, M. (Ed.) Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities (2nd edition). Wallingford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mycock, D. (1999) Addition of calcium and magnesium to a glycerol and sucrose cryoprotectant solution improves the quality of plant embryo recovery from cryostorage. Cryo-Letters 20, 77–82.Google Scholar
Normah, M.N., Chin, H.F. and Hor, Y.L. (1986) Desiccation and cryostorage of embryonic axes of Hevea brasiliensis Muel.-Arg. Pertanika 9, 299–303.Google Scholar
Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1999) A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccation-tolerance mechanisms. Seed Science Research 9, 13–37.Google Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Greggains, V., Kioko, J.I., Wesley-Smith, J., Berjak, P. and Finch-Savage, W.E. (1998) Effects of differential drying rates on viability retention of recalcitrant seeds of Ekebergia capensis. Seed Science Research 8, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P., Wesley-Smith, J. and Vander Willigen, C. (2002) Experimental aspects of drying and recovery. pp. 93–110in Black, M.; Pritchard, H.W. (Eds) Desiccation and survival in plants: Drying without dying. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Naidoo, S.Berjak, P. (2003) Desiccation rate, desiccation response and damage accumulation: Can desiccation sensitivity be quantified? pp. 319–325in Nicolás, G.; Bradford, K.J.; Côme, D.; Pritchard, H.W. (Eds) The biology of seeds. Recent research advances. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Potts, S.E. and Lumpkin, T.A. (1997) Cryopreservation of Wasabia spp. seeds. CryoLetters 18, 185–190.Google Scholar
Pritchard, H.W. (1991) Water potential and embryonic axis viability in recalcitrant seeds of Quercus rubra. Annals of Botany 67, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, H.W., Daws, M.I., Fletcher, B.J., Gaméné, C.S., Msanga, H.P. and Omondi, W. (2004) Ecological correlates of seed desiccation tolerance in tropical African dryland trees. American Journal of Botany 91, 863–870.Google Scholar
Probert, R.J. and Longley, P.L. (1989) Recalcitrant seed physiology of three aquatic grasses (Zizania palustris, Spartina anglica and Porteresia coarctata). Annals of Botany 63, 53–63.Google Scholar
Sershen, Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P. and Wesley-Smith, J. (2007) Cryopreservation of embryonic axes of selected amaryllid species. Cryo Letters 28, 387–399.Google Scholar
Sershen, Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (2008) Post-harvest behaviour and short- to medium-term storage of recalcitrant seeds and encapsulated embryonic axes of selected amaryllid species. Seed Science and Technology 36, (in press).Google Scholar
Snijman, D.A. (2000) Amaryllidaceae. pp. 570–576in Leistner, O.A. (Ed.) Seed plants of southern Africa: Families and genera. Strelitzia 10. Pretoria, South Africa, National Botanical Institute.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K., Daws, M.I. and Pritchard, H.W. (2007) Responses of Liriope platyphylla F.T. Wang & T. Tang and Ophiopogon japonicus (L.f.) Ker Gawl. seeds to desiccation. Seed Science and Technology 35, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, P.B. and Kemp, R. (1996) Database of tropical tree seed research (DABATTS) with special reference to the Dipterocarpaceae, Meliaceae and Araucariaceae. Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Tompsett, P.B. and Pritchard, H.W. (1998) The effect of chilling and moisture status on the germination, desiccation tolerance and longevity of Aesculus hippocastanum L. seed. Annals of Botany 82, 249–261.Google Scholar
Tweddle, J.C., Dickie, J.B., Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2003) Ecological aspects of seed desiccation sensitivity. Journal of Ecology 91, 294–304.Google Scholar
Vertucci, C.W., Crane, J., Porter, R.A. and Oelke, E.A. (1994) Physical properties of water in Zizania embryos in relation to maturity status, water content and temperature. Seed Science Research 4, 211–224.Google Scholar
Walters, C., Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P. and Crane, J. (2001) Desiccation damage, accelerated ageing and respiration in desiccation tolerant and sensitive seeds. Seed Science Research 11, 135–148.Google Scholar
Wood, C.B., Pritchard, H.W. and Amritphale, D. (2000) Desiccation-induced dormancy in papaya (Carica papaya L.) seeds is alleviated by heat shock. Seed Science Research 10, 135–145.Google Scholar