Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:07:34.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The application of image analysis in monitoring the imbibition process of white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

A. Dell'Aquila
Affiliation:
Germplasm Institute, CNR, 70126 Bari, Italy
J.W. van Eck
Affiliation:
Plant Research International, PO Box 16, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
G.W.A.M. van der Heijden*
Affiliation:
Plant Research International, PO Box 16, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Correspondence Fax: +31 317 418094 Email: [email protected]

Abstract

An image analysis system is described to study the process of imbibition in white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) seeds. The system consists of two components: 1) an environmental system where seeds germinate; 2) a computer imaging system, composed of a Charged Coupled Device (CCD)-imaging sensor, an image frame grabber, a computer and a video monitor. The measurement software can determine area, perimeter, width, length and eccentricity as descriptors of changes in seed size during swelling. The captured images of imbibing seeds allowed estimation of timing of ‘visible germination’ occurrence without any subjective evaluation. Using the area parameter, the imbibition process can be described graphically by a series of curves similar to the triphasic pattern of water uptake, with extension and rate depending on the degree of seed viability and germination medium conditions. Imbibitional osmotic stress, provided by -1.5 MPa mannitol, induced a large delay in germination and, upon stress removal, a more uniform radicle emergence. The versatility and the sensitivity of the method, together with the feasibility to investigate germination rate in individual seeds within a population, suggest that image analysis techniques have high potential in seed biology studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bewley, J.D. (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant Cell 9, 10551066.Google Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (1990) A water relations analysis of seed germination rates. Plant Physiology 94, 840849.Google Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (1996) Population-based models describing seed dormancy behaviour: implications for experimental design and interpretation. pp. 313339in Lang, G.A. (Ed) Plant dormancy. Physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Chavagnat, A. and Bastien, J.C. (1991) Determination de la qualitè des grains de Cupressus sempervirens L. et Cupressus arizonica E. Greene par la radiographie aux rayons X. Seed Science and Technology 19, 139146.Google Scholar
Dell'Aquila, A. (1992) Water uptake and protein synthesis in germinating wheat embryos under the osmotic stress of polyethylene glycol. Annals of Botany 69, 167171.Google Scholar
Draper, S.R. and Keefe, P.D. (1989) Machine vision for the characterization and identification of cultivars. Plant Varieties and Seeds 2, 5362.Google Scholar
Foucat, L., Chavagnat, A. and Renou, J-P. (1993) Nuclear magnetic resonance micro-imaging and X-radiography as possible techniques to study seed germination. Scientia Horticulturae 55, 323331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, M.S. and Stanwood, P.C. (1993 a) Measurement of seedling growth rate by machine vision. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 36, 959963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, M.S. and Stanwood, P.C. (1993 b) Imaging techniques to enhance the preservation and utilization of seed germplasm. Journal of Seed Technology 17, 5464.Google Scholar
ISTA (1985) International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology 13, 299355.Google Scholar
Keefe, P.D. and Draper, S.R. (1986) The measurement of new characters for cultivar identification in wheat using machine vision. Seed Science and Technology 14, 715724.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., van der Burg, W.J., Aarste, J.W., van Zwol, R.A., Jalink, H. and Bino, R.J. (1993) X-ray studies on changes in embryo and endosperm morphology during priming and imbibition of tomato seeds. Seed Science Research 3, 171178.Google Scholar
McCormac, A.C., Keefe, P.D. and Draper, S.R. (1990) Automated vigour testing of field vegetables using image analysis. Seed Science and Technology 18, 103112.Google Scholar
McCormac, A.C. and Keefe, P.D. (1990) Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) seed vigour: imbibition effects. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 893899.Google Scholar
McDonald, M.B. (1998) Seed quality assessment. Seed Science Research 8, 265275.Google Scholar
Simak, M. (1984) A method for removal of filled-dead seeds from a sample of Pinus contorta. Seed Science and Technology 12, 767775.Google Scholar
Simak, M., Bergsten, U. and Henriksson, G. (1989) Evaluation of ungerminated seeds at the end of germination test by radiography. Seed Science and Technology 17, 361369.Google Scholar
Steere, W.C., Levengood, W.C. and Bondie, J.M. (1981) An electronic analyser for evaluating seed germination and vigour. Seed Science and Technology 9, 567576.Google Scholar
Still, D.W., Dahal, P. and Bradford, K.J. (1997) A single-seed assay for endo-β-mannanase activity from tomato endosperm and radicle tissues. Plant Physiology 113, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Still, D.W. and Bradford, K.J. (1997) Endo-β-mannanase activity from individual tomato endosperm caps and radicle tips in relation to germination rates. Plant Physiology 113, 2129.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, G.W.A.M., Polder, G., van Eck, J.W. and van der Schoor, R. (1999) Automatic determination of germination of seeds. 1999 World Seed Conference6–8 September 1999Cambridge, UKProgramme & Abstracts, 14 pp.Google Scholar
van de Vooren, J.G., Polder, G. and van der Heijden, G.W.A.M. (1991) Application of image analysis for variety testing of mushroom. Euphytica 57, 245250.Google Scholar