Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:48:14.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed banking in ancient forest species: why total sampled area really matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2012

Jan Plue ,
Ken Thompson ,
Kris Verheyen  and
Martin Hermy
Jan Plue*
Affiliation:
Division for Forest, Nature and Landscape Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B-3001Belgium
Ken Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, SheffieldS10 2TN, UK
Kris Verheyen
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267, B-9090Belgium
Martin Hermy
Affiliation:
Division for Forest, Nature and Landscape Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B-3001Belgium
*
*Correspondence Fax: +468164955 Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates how methodological aspects of seed-bank sampling affect seed-bank records in temperate deciduous forests. We focused explicitly on seed-bank records of ancient forest species, which are assumed to lack a persistent seed bank; a hypothesis suspected to be partly due to methodological shortcomings. Through a quantitative review of 31 seed-bank studies in temperate deciduous forests of central and north-west Europe, we quantified the role of sampling methodology in constraining total seed-bank records and seed-bank records of ancient forest species (γ-diversity, average species' retrieval frequency and average seed density). A major methodological trade-off was established between sampled plot area and the number of plots: at an increased number of plots, the area sampled per plot decreased significantly. The total surface area sampled in a study was the primary determinant of γ-diversity, both for overall species richness and for ancient forest species richness. A high retrieval frequency of ancient forest species indicated that few plots were intensively sampled. The parallel increase in total species richness and ancient forest species richness and the non-significance of their ratio in relation to methodological variables suggests that ancient forest species are not particularly rare in the seed bank compared to other species. These results imply that sampling methodology has a far-reaching impact on seed-bank records such as γ-diversity, the detection of ancient forest species and ultimately seed-bank composition. We formulate a set of guidelines to improve the quality of seed-bank studies in temperate deciduous forests.

Keywords

diversitymethodologysampling errorsampling guidelinesseed banktemperate deciduous forest
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 123 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosio, L., Iglesias, L., Marin, C. and Del Monte, J.P. (2004) Evaluation of sampling methods and assessment of the sample size to estimate the weed seed bank in soil, taking into account spatial variability. Weed Research 44, 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrein, D., Rusterholz, H.P. and Baur, B. (2005) Disturbance of suburban Fagus forests by recreational activities: effects on soil characteristics, above-ground vegetation and seed bank. Applied Vegetation Science 8, 175–182.Google Scholar
Augusto, L., Dupouey, J.-L., Picard, J.-F. and Ranger, J. (2001) Potential contribution of the seed bank in coniferous plantations to the restoration of native deciduous forest vegetation. Acta Oecologia 22, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeten, L., Jacquemyn, H., Van Calster, H., Van Beek, E., Devlaeminck, R., Verheyen, K. and Hermy, M. (2009) Low recruitment across life stages partly accounts for the slow colonization of forest herbs. Journal of Ecology 97, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, R.M., Bakker, J.P., Grandin, U., Kalamees, R., Milberg, P., Poschlod, P., Thompson, K. and Willems, J.H. (1998) Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity. Functional Ecology 12, 834–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigwood, D.W. and Inouye, D.W. (1988) Spatial pattern analysis of seed banks: an improved method and optimized sampling. Ecology 69, 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossuyt, B. and Hermy, M. (2001) Influence of land use history on seed banks in European temperate forest ecosystems: a review. Ecography 24, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossuyt, B. and Honnay, O. (2008) Can the seed bank be used for ecological restoration? An overview of seed bank characteristics in European communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 19, 875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossuyt, B., Heyn, M. and Hermy, M. (2002) Seed bank and vegetation composition of forest stands of varying age in central Belgium: consequences for regeneration of ancient forest vegetation. Plant Ecology 162, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossuyt, B., Van Wichelen, J. and Hoffmann, M. (2007) Predicting future community composition from random soil seed bank sampling – evidence from a drained lake bottom. Journal of Vegetation Science 18, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.H.F. and Oosterhuis, L. (1981) The role of buried seeds in coppicewoods. Biological Conservation 21, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, G.P., Howell, R. and Anderson, M.A. (1997) Vegetation succession following ride edge management in lowland plantations and woods. 2. The seed bank resource. Biological Conservation 82, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Frenne, P., Baeten, L., Graae, B.J., Brunet, J., Wulf, M., Orczewska, A., Kolb, A., Jansen, I., Jamoneau, A., Jacquemyn, H., Hermy, M., Diekmann, M., De Schrijver, A., De Sanctis, M., Decocq, G., Cousins, S.A.O. and Verheyen, K. (2011) Interregional variation in the floristic recovery of post-agricultural forests. Journal of Ecology 99, 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlaeminck, R., Bossuyt, B. and Hermy, M. (2004) The effect of sampling period on results of seedling germination experiments in cropland and forest. Belgian Journal of Botany 137, 27–35.Google Scholar
Dougall, T.A.G. and Dodd, J.C. (1997) A study of species richness and diversity in seed banks and its use for the environmental mitigation of a proposed holiday village development in a coniferized woodland in south east England. Biological Conservation 6, 1413–1428.Google Scholar
Dupuy, J.M. and Chazdon, R.L. (1998) Long-term effects of forest regrowth and selective logging on the soil seed bank of tropical forests in NE Costa Rica. Biotropica 30, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrecht, L. and Schmidt, W. (2008) Bedeutung der bodensamenbank und des diasporentransports durch forstmaschinen für die entwicklung der vegetation auf rückegassen. Forstarchiv 79, 91–105 (in German).Google Scholar
Glass, G.V. and Hopkins, D.V. (1995) Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd edition). Boston, Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Gross, K.L. (1990) A comparion of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Journal of Ecology 78, 1079–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, F. (2011) Getting started with meta-analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermy, M. and Verheyen, K. (2007) Legacies of the past in present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Ecological Research 22, 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermy, M., Honnay, O., Firbank, L., Grashof-Bokdam, C. and Lawesson, J.E. (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biological Conservation 91, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holderegger, R. (1996) Effects of litter removal on the germination of Anemone nemorosa. Flora 191, 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopfensperger, K.N. (2007) A review of similarity between seed bank and standing vegetation across ecosystems. Oikos 116, 1438–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowska-Blaszczuk, M. and Grubb, P.J. (1997) Soil seed banks in primary and secondary deciduous forest in Bialowieza, Poland. Seed Science Research 7, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowska-Blaszczuk, M. and Grubb, P.J. (2006) Changing perspectives on the role of the soil seed bank in northern temperate deciduous forests and in tropical lowland rain forests: parallels and contrasts. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowska-Blaszczuk, M., Kwiatkowska, A.J., Panufnik, D. and Tanner, E. (1998) The size and diversity of the soil seed banks and the light requirements of the species in sunny and shady natural communities of the Bialowieza Primeval Forest. Plant Ecology 136, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellson, G. (1992) Seed banks in Danish deciduous forests – species composition, seed influx and distribution pattern in soil. Ecography 15, 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostel-Hughes, F., Young, T.P. and Carreiro, M.M. (1998) Forest leaf litter quantity and seedling occurrence along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 2, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leckie, S., Vellend, M., Bell, G., Waterway, M.J. and Lechowicz, M. (2000) The seed bank in an old-growth, temperate deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 78, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology (2nd English edition). Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Måren, I.E., Janovksy, Z., Spindelbock, J.P., Daws, M.I., Kaland, P.E. and Vandvik, V. (2010) Prescribed burning of northern heathlands: Calluna vulgaris germination cues and seed-bank dynamics. Plant Ecology 207, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterken, G.P. (1976) Long-term changes in the woodlands of Rockingham forest and other areas. Journal of Ecology 64, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrov, V.V. (1987) Seed bank in the soil of broad-leaved forests (new data). Biologiya 42, 55–59.Google Scholar
Plue, J., Goyens, G., Van Meirvenne, M., Verheyen, K. and Hermy, M. (2010) Small-scale seed bank spatial structure in a forest soil. Seed Science Research 20, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, J.N., Wright, B.D., Gross, C.L. and Whalley, W.R.D.N. (2010) Comparison of seedling emergence and seed extraction techniques for estimating the composition of soil seed banks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterthwaite, W.H. (2010) Competition for space can drive the evolution of dormancy in a temporally invariant environment. Plant Ecology 208, 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M., Ewald, J., Fischer, A., von Oheimb, G., Kriebitsch, W.-U., Schmidt, W. and Ellenberg, H. (2003) Liste der typischen Waldgefäβpflanzen Deutschlands. Mitteilung der Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst- und Holzwirtschaft 212, 1–34 (in German).Google Scholar
Snyder, R.E. (2006) Multiple risk reduction mechanisms: can dormancy substitute for dispersal? Ecology Letters 9, 1106–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staaf, H., Jonsson, M. and Olsen, L.-G. (1987) Buried germinative seeds in mature beech forests with different herbaceous vegetation and soil types. Holarctic Ecology 10, 268–277.Google Scholar
Stark, K.E., Arsenault, A. and Bradfield, G.E. (2008) Variation in soil seed bank species composition of a dry coniferous forest: spatial scale and sampling considerations. Plant Ecology 197, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Heerdt, G.N.J., Schutter, A. and Bakker, J.P. (1999) The effect of water supply on seed-bank analysis using the seedling-emergence method. Functional Ecology 13, 428–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. (1986) Small-scale heterogeneity in the seed bank of an acidic grassland. Journal of Ecology 74, 733–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K., Bakker, J.P., Bekker, R.M. and Hodgson, J.G. (1998) Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. Journal of Ecology 86, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verheyen, K., Honnay, O., Motzkin, G., Hermy, M. and Foster, D.R. (2003) Response of forest plant species to land-use change: a life-history trait-based approach. Journal of Ecology 91, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, S.J., Thompson, K. and Kent, M. (1993) Seed banks as a neglected area of biogeographic research: a review of literature and sampling techniques. Progress in Physical Geography 17, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wódkiewicz, M. and Kwiatkowska-Falinska, A.J. (2010) Similarity between seed bank and herb layer in a natural deciduous temperate lowland forest. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 79, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobel, M., Kalamees, R., Püssa, K., Roosaluste, E. and Moora, M. (2007) Soil seed bank and vegetation in mixed coniferous forest stands with different disturbance regimes. Forest, Ecology and Management 250, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Plue Supplementary Table 1

Table S1. All 36 studies (including additional references not listed in the article reference list) with their main methodological characteristics (a) and data quality remarks (b). Studies marked in grey were excluded due to methodological aberrations.

Download Plue Supplementary Table 1(File)
File 610.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Plue Supplementary Table 2

Table S2: Three full unpublished datasets including basic details on the various studies. As these studies remain unpublished until today, seed bank data are only presented as presence-absence data.

Download Plue Supplementary Table 2(File)
File 95.2 KB