Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:36:06.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Identities of One Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Robert W. Jenson
Robert W. Jenson
Affiliation:
Lutheran Theological Seminary Gettysburg Pennsylvania 17325
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following speculations do not pretend to state a complete doctrine of the Trinity, though they do state decisive parts of one. The first section is an account of what is, in my view, the function of a Trinity-doctrine, and will to some extent repeat work also published elsewhere. The second section is an interpretation of the trinitarian word ‘hypostasis’, that tries to display the conceptual revolution made by the traditional trinitarian assertion of ‘three hypostases of God’. The third considers the oneness of God, by analysing a famous argument of Gregory of Nyssa. And the fourth draws some further conclusions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 Most compendiously in Story and Promise, pp. 113–28.

page 8 note 1 e.g., Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1072b. Lapidary: ho theos kreitton kai aphthartos physis. Fragments, 1476a, 32.

page 9 note 1 Ad Ablabium, quod non sint tres dei. Opera, ed. Jacger, vol. III/I, pp. 37–57.

page 9 note 2 ibid., p. 42, lines 13–20.