Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:55:54.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lex orandi, lex credendi: worship and doctrine in Revelation 4–51

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

Fergus King
Fergus King*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan NSW 2308, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A number of New Testament scholars, including John O'Neill and Larry Hurtado, have drawn attention to the prospects which worship texts in the writings of the New Testament offer in revealing the way in which the first Christians thought of Jesus. Whilst the impossibility of separating the Jesus of history from the Christ of faith has contributed to this development and has also been a central impulse in the so-called Third Quest, the ancient principle of lex orandi, lex credendi, coined by Prosper of Aquitaine, gives a further theological foundation for such explorations. However, its later distortion, particularly in the aftermath of the Reformation, has privileged doctrine (credendi) over experience (orandi), and diminished the reciprocity between the two demanded by the classical formulation.

Revelation 4–5 are explored as two texts which are rooted in experience, both of Christian liturgy and the merkavah traditions which drew on the heavenly visions of prophets like Ezekiel and Isaiah. Viewed from this perspective, the visions make claims about the divinity of the Lamb and the propriety of its worship on the basis of religious experience, embodied in authoritative claims for both ‘altered states of consciousness’ and literary tropes. They give pictorial descriptions and visions which should stand as authoritative theological claims in their own right.

However, modern New Testament scholarship, following post-Reformation patterns, attempts to explain these visions in more technical and abstract theological terms such as binitarian or trinitarian. This, it is suggested, is undesirable because of the danger of importing anachronisms, with their attendant theological bag and baggage, of making overly bold claims for our knowledge of the individuals, communities and/or circumstances which produced these texts (given both the oscillation of New Testament writers between binitarian and trinitarian tendencies, and a degree of confusion caused by the role of the Spirit in related discourse), and of shifting the locus of meaning from the texts themselves to secondary explications (a phenomenon which appears peculiarly attractive to modern scholarship).

Drawing on Wittgenstein's reflections on the study and analysis of religious experience, it is suggested that it may be wiser to leave the texts to stand in their own right, rather than to be interpreted via theological categories which may ultimately say more about the concerns of modern scholars than the producers of the texts.

Keywords

altered states of consciousnesshermeneuticslex orandimerkavahRevelationWittgenstein
Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 33 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

An abridged version of this article was presented at ‘Bounden to Say: The Book of Common Prayer Then and Now’, the 3rd St Paul's College Symposium, University of Sydney, 30 Nov. 2011.

References

2 O'Neill, John C., Who did Jesus Think he Was? (Leiden: Brill, 1995), p. 1Google Scholar.

3 Fee, Gordon D., To What End Exegesis? Essays Textual, Exegetical and Theological (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001), p. 330Google Scholar, has argued that ‘trinitarian’ may be used validly: ‘Fully developed doctrine, no, experienced reality, yes’.

4 E.g. Boyarin, Daniel, The Jewish Gospels: The Story of the Jewish Christ (New York: New Press, 2012)Google Scholar provides a popular level, if somewhat selective, overview of such developments, also Lee, Aquila H. I., From Messiah to Pre-existent Son (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2009)Google Scholar.

5 E.g. Heil, John Paul, The Letters of Paul as Rituals of Worship (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2011), p. 3Google Scholar.

6 O'Neill, Who?, p. 2.

7 Hurtado, Larry W, One God, One Lord: Early Christian Devotion and Ancient Jewish Monotheism (London: SCM, 1988), pp. 10–11Google Scholar.

8 Schneiders, Sandra M., The Revelatory Text: Interpreting the New Testament as Sacred Scripture (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1999), pp. 97–111Google Scholar.

9 Carr, Edward H., What is History? (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990), 2nd ednGoogle Scholar; Winschuttle, Keith, ‘The Real Stuff of History’, in Kramer, Hilton and Kimball, Roger (eds), The Future of the European Past (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1997), pp. 127–52Google Scholar.

10 E.g. Funk, Robert W., Hoover, Roy W. and the Jesus Seminar, The Five Gospels: The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus (New York: Macmillan, 1993)Google Scholar. For a sympathetic view of the Seminar, see Borg, Marcus J., Jesus in Contemporary Scholarship (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity, 1994), pp. 160–81Google Scholar. For criticism, see Bock, Darrell L., Studying the Historical Jesus: A Guide to Sources and Methods (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2002), pp. 146–7, 183, 200Google Scholar; Quarles, Charles Leland, ‘The Authenticity of the Parable of the Warring King: A Response to the Jesus Seminar’, in Chilton, Bruce and Evans, Craig A. (eds), Authenticating the Words of Jesus (Leiden: Brill, 1999), pp. 409–29Google Scholar; Witherington III, Ben E., The Jesus Quest: The Third Search for the Jew of Nazareth (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1997), 2nd edn, pp. 42–57Google Scholar. For a lament over the quality of scholarship in the controversies raised by the Seminar, see Casey, Maurice, Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian's Account of his Life and Teaching (London: T&T Clark, 2010), pp. 20–5Google Scholar.

11 Thus Gerhardsson, Birger, Memory and Manuscript with Tradition and Transmission in Early Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998)Google Scholar and scholars like Samuel Byrskog, Rainer Reisner and the Uppsala school.

12 Allison, Dale, Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination and History (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2010), pp. 16–17, esp. n. 75Google Scholar.

13 Allison, Constructing Jesus, p. 17.

14 Mascall, Eric L., Theology and the Gospel of Christ: An Essay in Reorientation (London: SCM, 1984), 2nd edn, pp. 70–6Google Scholar; Schadewaldt, Wolfgang, ‘The Reliability of the Synoptic Tradition’, in Hengel, Martin (ed.), Studies in the Gospel of Mark, trans. Bowden, J. (London: SCM, 1985), pp. 89–113Google Scholar; Schnabel, Eckhard, Early Christian Mission: Jesus and the Twelve (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2004), pp. 20–35Google Scholar.

15 Scroggs, Robin, The Text and the Times: New Testament Essays for Today (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993), pp. 217–18Google Scholar.

16 Dewey, John, The Essential Dewey, vol. 1, Pragmatism, Education, Democracy, ed. Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998), p. 206Google Scholar; James, William, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (New York: Cosimo, 2007), p. 17Google Scholar; McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and his Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Modern World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010), pp. 141–3Google Scholar.

17 Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought (New York: Basic, 1999), p. 6Google Scholar; McGilchrist, Master, p. 149.

18 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, trans. Weisheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G. (London: Sheed & Ward, 1989), pp. 302–7Google Scholar; Thiselton, Anthony, The Two Horizons: New Testament Hermeneutics and Philosophical Description (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993), pp. 16, 53–73Google Scholar.

19 Nagel, cited in McGilchrist, Master, p. 28.

20 McGilchrist, Master, p. 28.

21 Kelsey, David H., Between Athens and Berlin: The Theological Education Debate (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993), pp. 12–19Google Scholar.

22 McGilchrist, Master, p. 96.

23 Ibid., p. 29.

24 Heil, Rituals of Worship, pp. 2–3.

25 Anderson, E. Byron, Worship and Christian Identity: Practicing Ourselves (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2003), p. 25Google Scholar.

26 Ibid.

27 Kavanagh, Aidan, On Liturgical Theology (New York: Pueblo, 1984), pp. 91, 92, 134; Anderson, Worship, p. 26Google Scholar.

28 Moore-Keish, Martha L., Do This in Remembrance of Me: A Ritual Approach to Reformed Eucharistic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008)Google Scholar.

29 Wainwright, Geoffrey, Doxology: The Praise of God in Worship, Doctrine and Life: A Systematic Theology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), pp. 218–83Google Scholar.

30 Moore-Keish, Do This, p. 68. See further Marshall, Paul V., ‘Reconsidering Liturgical Theology: Is there a Lex Orandi for All Christians?’, Studia Liturgica 25 (1995), pp. 129–51Google Scholar.

31 Moore-Keish, Do This, pp. 19–22.

32 Kavanagh, On Liturgical Theology, pp. 81, 105–6.

33 Wannenwetsch, Bernd, Political Worship: Ethics for Christian Citizens, trans. Kohl, Margaret (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 82–3Google Scholar.

34 Hudson, Winthrop S., The Cambridge Connection and the Elizabethan Settlement of 1559 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1980), pp. 124–30Google Scholar; Jenkins, Gary, ‘Peter Martyr and the Church of England after 1558’, in James, Frank A. (ed.), Peter Martyr Vermigli and the European Reformations (Leiden: Brill, 2004), pp. 47–69, esp. pp. 50–5Google Scholar; Kirby, Torrance, ‘“Relics of the Amorites” or “Things Indifferent”: Peter Martyr Vermigli's Authority and the Threat of Schism in the Elizabethan Vestiarian Controversy’, Reformation and Renaissance Review 6/3 (2004), pp. 313–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Griffiths, David N., The Bibliography of the Book of Common Prayer 1549–1999 (London: British Library, 2002), p. 102Google Scholar. For more details on the Scottish Prayer Book of 1637, and the 1549 version, see Hefling, Charles ‘Scotland: Episcopalians and Non-Jurors’, in Hefling, Charles and Shattuck, Cynthia (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 166–76, esp. pp. 166–8Google Scholar.

36 Chapman, Mark D., ‘Christ and the Gethsemane of Mind: Frank Weston Then and Now’, Anglican Theological Review 85/2 (2003), pp. 281–307, esp. pp. 283–4Google Scholar.

37 Davies, John G., ‘The Influence of Architecture on Liturgical Change’, Studia Liturgica 9 (1973), pp. 230–40, esp. pp. 232–3Google Scholar.

38 For the interdependence of worship and doctrine in the apostolic and patristic periods, see Gavrilyuk, Paul L., ‘Canonical Liturgies: The Dialectic of Lex Orandi and Lex Credendi’, in Abraham, William J., Vickers, Jason E. and Van Kirk, Natalie B. (eds), Canonical Theism: A Proposal for Theology and the Church (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008), pp. 61–72Google Scholar.

39 Anderson, Worship, p. 27. Vivendi is used by Irwin, Keith, Context and Text: Method in Liturgical Theology (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1994), pp. 56–7Google Scholar.

40 Tammany, Klara, Living Water: Baptism as a Way of Life (New York: Church Publishing, 2003), p. xviGoogle Scholar.

41 Ramsey, Paul, ‘Liturgy and Ethics’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 7/2 (1979), pp. 139–71Google Scholar; Wannenwetsch, Political Worship, p. 80.

42 Anderson, Worship, p. 27. Saliers, Don, ‘Liturgy and Ethics: Some New Beginnings’, Journal of Religious Ethics 7/2 (1979), pp. 173–89Google Scholar.

43 King, Fergus J., ‘There's More to Meals than Food: A Contextual Interpretation of Paul's Understanding of the Corinthian Lord's Supper’, in Burns, Stephen and Monro, Anita (eds), Christian Worship In Australia (Strathfield: St Paul's, 2009), pp. 167–79Google Scholar.

44 Anderson, Worship, p. 29.

45 Rowland, Christopher, The Open Heaven: A Study of Apocalyptic in Judaism and Early Christianity (New York: Crossroad, 1982), pp. 403–13Google Scholar.

46 Bauckham, Richard, The Climax of Prophecy: Studies on the Book of Revelation (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993), pp. 407–23Google Scholar; Collins, John J., The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature (New York: Crossroads, 1998), 2nd edn, pp. 235–6Google Scholar.

47 Robinson, John A. T., Redating the New Testament (London: SCM, 1976), pp. 239–40Google Scholar.

48 Wilson, J. C., ‘The Problem of the Domitianic Date of Revelation’, New Testament Studies 39 (1993), pp. 606–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See Robinson, Redating, pp. 220–6, 232–3.

49 Scobie, C. H. H., ‘Local Reference in the Letters to the Seven Churches’, New Testament Studies 39 (1993), pp. 587–605Google Scholar.

50 Aune, David, Revelation 1–5, Word Bible Commentary, 52a (Dallas, TX: Word, 1997), pp. 28–9Google Scholar; Revelation 17–22 in Word Bible Commentary 52c (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1998), pp. 1206–8.

51 Bucur, Bogdan G., Angelomorphic Pneumatology: Clement of Alexandria and Other Early Christian Witnesses (Leiden: Brill, 2009), pp. 108–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mowry, Lucetta, ‘Rev 4–5 and Early Christian Liturgical Usage’, Journal of Biblical Literature 71/2 (1952), pp. 75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Wink, Walter, Naming the Powers: The Language of Power in the New Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1994), pp. 5–6Google Scholar.

53 Edwards, Michael J., ‘Treading the Aether: Lucretius, De Rerum Natura 1.62–79’, Classical Quarterly 40/2 (1990), pp. 465–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Gieschen, Charles A., ‘Baptismal Praxis and Mystical Experience in the Book of Revelation’, in DeConick, April D. (ed.), Paradise Now: Essays on Early Jewish and Christian Mysticism (Atlanta, GA: SBL, 2006), pp. 341–54, at p. 353Google Scholar; Hurtado, Larry, At the Origins of Christian Worship (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), p. 90Google Scholar. Also, Hurtado, One God, p. 103.

55 Hurtado, One God, p. 101.

56 Hurtado, One God, p. 102; Hurtado, At the Origins, pp. 63–97; Hurtado, Larry W., Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005), pp.135–7Google Scholar.

57 Alexander, Philip S., ‘Qumran and the Genealogy of Western Mysticism’ in Chazon, Esther G., Halper-Amaru, Betsy and Clements, Ruth A. (eds), New Perspectives on Old Texts: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium of the Orion Center for the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Associated Literature, 9–11 January, 2005 (Leiden: Brill, 2010), pp. 215–35 at p. 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Gruenwald, Ithamar, Apocalyptic and Merkavah Mysticism (Leiden: Brill, 1979), p. 62Google Scholar; Himmelfarb, Martha, ‘Merkavah Mysticism since Scholem: Rachel Elior's The Three Temples’, in Peter Schäfer and Elisabeth Müller-Luckner (eds), Wege mystischer Gotteserfahrung: Judentum, Christentum und Islam (Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 2006), pp. 19–36, at p. 30Google Scholar; Prigent, Pierre, Commentary on the Apocalypse of St John, trans. Pradels, Wendy (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001), pp. 29–32Google Scholar.

59 Russell, Norman, The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition (Oxford: OUP, 2005), pp. 67–71Google Scholar.

60 Rachel Elior, ‘The Foundations of Early Jewish Mysticism: The Lost Calendar and the Transformed Heavenly Chariot’, in Schäfer and Müller-Luckner, Wege mystischer Gotteserfahrung, pp. 1–18 at pp. 2–4.

61 Collins, Apocalyptic Imagination, pp. 2–12. For merkavah and the genre of the apocalypse, see Aune, David E., Apocalypticism, Prophecy and Magic in Early Christianity, WUNT 199 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006), p. 57Google Scholar, esp. the bibliography in n. 56; Gruenwald, Apocalyptic, pp. 29–72.

62 For detailed studies of the merkavah, in the Second Temple period and beyond, see April D. DeConick (ed.), Paradise Now, and Halperin, David J., The Faces of the Chariot: Early Responses to Ezekiel's Vision (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1988)Google Scholar.

63 Aune, Revelation 1–5, pp. 278–9.

64 Himmelfarb, Martha, ‘Revelation and Rapture: The Transformation of the Visionary in Ascent Apocalpyses’, in Collins, John J. and Charlesworth, James H. (eds), Mysteries and Revelations: Apocalyptic Studies since the Uppsala Colloquium (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1991), pp. 79–90, at pp. 88–90Google Scholar.

65 Ostow, Mortimer, ‘The Psychodynamics of Merkavah Mysticism’, in Ostow, Mortimer (ed.), Ultimate Intimacy: The Psychodynamics of Jewish Mysticism (New York: Karnac, 1995), pp. 152–80, esp. p. 155Google Scholar, Seth L. Sanders, ‘Performative Exegesis’, in DeConick, Paradise Now, pp. 57–79, and Peter Schäfer, ‘Communion with the Angels: Qumran and the Origins of Jewish Mysticism’, in Schäfer and Müller-Luckner, Wege mystischer Gotteserfahrung, pp. 37–66, notes the liturgical and communitarian dimensions of the Qumran materials. DeConick, April, ‘Jesus Revealed: The Dynamics of Early Christian Mysticism’, in Arbel, Daphna V. and Orlov, Andrei A. (eds), With Letters of Light: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Early Jewish Apocalypticism, Magic and Mysticism in Honor of Rachel Elior (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011), pp. 301–24Google Scholar, explores the breadth of early Christian experience, and its liturgical and sacramental implications (pp. 316–24).

66 Prigent, Commentary, pp. 233–4. This also shows the ‘eclectic qualities’ of the Johannine vision; Gruenwald, Apocalyptic, p. 69.

67 Prigent, Commentary, pp. 223, 225–7, 229–34; Rowland, Christopher, The Mystery of God: Early Jewish Mysticism and the New Testament (Leiden: Brill, 2009), pp. 65, 72–6Google Scholar.

68 Gruenwald, Apocalyptic, pp. 62–9; Halperin, Faces, pp. 87–96.

69 Cameron C. Afzal, ‘Wheels of Time in the Apocalypse of Jesus Christ’, in DeConick, Paradise Now, pp. 195–209, at p. 208; Prigent, Commentary, p. 232. Rowland, Mystery, p. 73, sees no such reference.

70 Afzal, ‘Wheels’, p. 200. Note that this identification with merkavah does not exclude elements of political parody of Rome also being present, see also Boring, M. Eugene, Revelation in Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching (Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 1989), p. 103Google Scholar.

71 Afzal, ‘Wheels’, p. 200. Other interpretations are possible, but may be disputed on methodological grounds: Ostow, ‘Psychodynamics’, p. 174, considers the merkavah represent ‘the universal unconscious fantasies of mankind’. See David J. Halperin, ‘Methodological Reflections on Psychoanalysis and Judaic Studies: A Response to Mortimer Ostow’, in Ostow, Ultimate Intimacy, pp. 183–99, for the relative merits of psychodynamic, historical and philological approaches.

72 Stone, Michael E., Ancient Judaism: New Visions and Views (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011), pp. 90–121Google Scholar; Collins, Apocalyptic Imagination, pp. 39–40; Rowland, Mystery, pp. 84–9. Collins, John J., ‘Pseudonymity, Historical Reviews and the Genre of Revelation of John’, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 39 (1977), pp. 329–43, at p. 332Google Scholar, suggests that Revelation's departure from pseudonymity is of little consequence. For cultural and neurological foundations for heavenly journeys, see Alan F. Segal, ‘Religious Experience and the Construction of the Transcendent Self’, in DeConick, Paradise Now, pp. 27–40. For the view that apocalypses may be literary constructs, see Himmelfarb, ‘Revelation and Rapture’, pp. 87–8. For a particular focus on religious experience shaping Revelation, see Christopher Rowland with Patricia Gibbons and Vicente Dobroruka, ‘Visionary Experience in Ancient Judaism and Christianity’, in DeConick, Paradise Now, pp. 41–56.

73 Afzal, ‘Wheels’, p. 209.

74 This exemplifies the earlier discussion on the role of worship texts in historical criticism. For material on altered states of consciousness, see Malina, Bruce J. and Pilch, John J., Social-Science Commentary on the Book of Revelation (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000), pp. 41–4Google Scholar; Pilch, John J., ‘Altered States of Consciousness in the Synoptics’, in Stegemann, Wolfgang, Malina, Bruce J. and Theissen, Gerd (eds), The Social Setting of Jesus and the Gospels (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002), pp. 103–15, at p. 105Google Scholar; Tart, Charles, ‘A Systems Approach to Altered States of Consciousness’, in Davidson, Julian M. and Davidson, Richard J. (eds), The Psychobiology of Consciousness (New York: Plenum, 1980), pp. 243–69, at p. 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Alexander, ‘Qumran’, p. 232; Prigent, Commentary, p. 239.

76 Prigent, Commentary, pp. 253–6.

77 Bauckham, Climax, pp. 137–8.

78 Rowland, Mystery, p. 92.

79 Neyrey, Jerome H., The Gospel of John in Cultural and Social Perspective (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009), pp. 33–7Google Scholar.

80 Aune, Revelation 1–5, p. 262.

81 Bauckham, Climax, pp. 120–32; King, Fergus J., ‘Travesty or Taboo: “Drinking Blood” and Revelation 17:2–6’, Neotestamentica 38/2 (2004), pp. 303–25Google Scholar.

82 Prigent, Commentary, p. 255.

83 Neyrey, Jerome H., Honor and Shame in the Gospel of Matthew (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998), pp. 1–32Google Scholar; Malina, Bruce J. and Neyrey, Jerome H., ‘Honor and Shame in the Ancient World: Pivotal Values of the Mediterranean World’, in Neyrey, Jerome H. (ed.), The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1991), pp. 27–65Google Scholar.

84 Fee, To What End?, pp. 330–1, n. 3.

85 Hurtado, One God, pp. 101–4.

86 Hanson, R. P. C. and Hanson, A. T., Reasonable Belief: A Survey of the Christian Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 155Google Scholar.

87 Paglia, Camille, ‘Junk Bonds and Corporate Raiders: Academe in the Hour of the Wolf’, in Paglia, Camille (ed.), Sex, Art, and American Culture (London: Viking, 1992), pp. 170–248Google Scholar, esp. p. 189.

88 Segal, Alan F., Two Powers in Heaven: Early Rabbinic Reports about Christianity and Gnosticism (Leiden: Brill, 2002), p. 2Google Scholar, prefers the rabbinic term ‘two powers in heaven’, to avoid leaning towards either ditheism or binitarianism. However, he admits this may import dualism instead.

89 Kilpatrick, G. D., The Eucharist in Bible and Liturgy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 57Google Scholar.

90 Burchard, Christoph, ‘The Importance of Joseph and Aseneth for the Study of the New Testament: A General Survey and a Fresh Look at the Lord's Supper’, New Testament Studies 33 (1987), pp. 102–34, at p. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 Wharton, Annabel J., ‘Good and Bad Images from the Synagogue of Dura Europos: Contexts, Subtexts, Intertexts’, Art History 17 (1994), pp. 1–25, at p. 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Ibid., p. 14.

93 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, ed. Rhees, (Retford: Brynmill, 1979), p. 2eGoogle Scholar.

94 Price, S. R. F., ‘Between Man and God: Sacrifice in the Imperial Roman Cult’, Journal of Roman Studies 70 (1980), pp. 28–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Gorman, Michael J., Cruciformity: Paul's Narrative Spirituality of the Cross (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001), p. 71Google Scholar.

96 Wittgenstein, Remarks, p. 7e.

97 Hurtado, One God, p. 2, introduces a ‘binitarian shape’ with no further definition.

98 Buber, Martin, Two Types of Faith, trans. Goldhawk, P. M. A. (London: Routledge, Kegan & Paul, 1951), p. 128Google Scholar.

99 Hurtado, At the Origins, p. 95. Binitarian is used to avoid the impression of ditheism (Lord Jesus Christ, p. 53); further, Hurtado, Larry W., How on Earth did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005), p. 48Google Scholar.

100 Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ, p. 50.

101 Hurtado, Larry W., God in New Testament Theology (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2010)Google Scholar.

102 Wittgenstein, Remarks, p. 2e.

103 McGilchrist, Master, pp. 5–14.

104 Thus Clinton Arnold's introductory comments in Wilkins, Michael J., Matthew, Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2002), p. viGoogle Scholar.

105 Wittgenstein, Remarks, p. 5e.

106 Schweitzer, Albert, The Quest of the Historical Jesus, trans. Montgomery, W. (London: SCM, 1981), 2nd edn, p. 311Google Scholar, see also Pope-Levison, Priscilla and Levison, John, Jesus in Global Contexts (Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1992), p. 14Google Scholar.

107 Tyrrell, George, Christianity at the Crossroads (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1909), p. 49Google Scholar.

108 Hurtado, At the Origins, p. 94. See also O'Collins, Gerald, ‘The Holy Trinity: The State of the Questions’, in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel and O'Collins, Gerald (eds), The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 1–25, esp. p. 7Google Scholar. For an overview of the Spirit in Revelation see Bauckham, Richard, The Theology of the Book of Revelation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 109–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

109 Bauckham, Climax, p. 134.

110 Bucur, Angelomorphic, pp. 91–104.

111 Bauckham, Theology, p. 111; Bucur, Angelomorphic, p. 92

112 For an overview of Spirit in the New Testament, see James Mackey, P., The Christian Experience of God as Trinity (London: SCM, 1983), pp. 66–87Google Scholar.

113 See further, Kinlaw, Pamela E., The Christ is Jesus: Metamorphosis, Possession, and Johannine Christology (Boston: Brill, 2005), pp. 152–61Google Scholar.

114 Gorman, Cruciformity, p. 71.

115 Bucur, Angelomorphic, p. 100.

116 I assume here a hermeneutics of ‘inter-subjective agreement’, see Apel, Karl-Otto, Towards a Transformation of Philosophy (London: Routledge, Kegan & Paul, 1980), p. 111Google Scholar.

117 Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja, Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 57Google Scholar.

118 Scroggs, The Text, pp. 219–33, further explores the interplay between dogmatic theology and New Testament theology.