No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
The task undertaken in this essay is to consider the significance for Christology of a relatively orthodox incarnational kind, of the fact that Jesus of Nazareth was a first century Jew. In other words the frame of reference taken here is the Christianity of the Christian creeds. The question asked is what the Jewishness of Jesus means for that. The task, no doubt, would have been much easier, though less interesting, had we followed the example of those who seek to demythologise the doctrine of the Incarnation, either in the interests of an eirenic global, pluralist, theology of religions, or in the interests of a purely expressivist, anti-realist, analysis of Christian faith. Even on such views as these, as represented by John Hick and Don Cupitt for example, there would be some interesting questions remaining: what still differentiates Christianity from Judaism? Why follow the Jewish prophet, Jesus, rather than some other? Does the Christian ideal necessarily retain its historical links with the Jewish ideal? But these are not the questions pursued here. It is not necessary to abandon the characteristic tenets of one's faith in order to make progress in inter-faith dialogue. Rather, what we bring to the dialogue and submit to mutual questioning are the distinctive and representative faith-stances, true to the patterns of belief and worship of the majority of our coreligionists.
page 28 note 1 Wiles, M. F., The Remaking of Christian Doctrine, SCM Press 1974, p. 18Google Scholar.
page 29 note 2 See Sykes, S. W., ‘The Strange Persistence of Kenotic Christology in Kee, A. and Long, E. T. (eds.), Being and Truth. Essays in Honour of John Macquarrie, SCM Press 1986Google Scholar.
page 29 note 3 Woods, G. F., Theological Explanation, Nisbet 1958Google Scholar.
page 30 note 4 Isaiah, chapter 53.
page 30 note 5 Moltmann, J., The Crucified God, SCM Press 1974Google Scholar.
page 30 note 6 Oman, J., Grace and Personality, Cambridge University Press 1917Google Scholar.
page 31 note 7 Farrer, A. M., Saving Belief, Hodder and Stoughton 1964, p. 69Google Scholar.
page 31 note 8 Farrer, A. M., Faith and Speculation, A. & C. Black 1967, p. 103Google Scholar.
page 32 note 9 Vermes, G., Jesus the Jew, Collins 1973Google Scholar.
page 32 note 10 Sanders, E. P., Jesus and Judaism, SCM Press 1985Google Scholar.
page 32 note 11 S. Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments, chapter two.
page 32 note 12 Farrer, A. M., A Science of God?, Geoffrey Bles 1966, p. 78Google Scholar.
page 35 note 13 Brown, D., The Divine Trinity, Duckworth 1985Google Scholar.
page 37 note 14 Morris, T. V., The Logic of God Incarnate, Cornell University Press 1986Google Scholar.
page 37 note 15 In ‘The Uniqueness of the Incarnation’, now reprinted in Hebblethwaite, B. L., The Incarnation. Collected Essays in Christology, Cambridge University Press 1987, pp. 49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 41 note 16 Grant, M., Jesus, Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1977, chapter tenGoogle Scholar.
page 41 note 17 Op. cit. pp. 37–40.
page 41 note 18 Op. cit. p. 320.
page 41 note 19 Wiles, M. F., God's Action in the World, SCM Press 1986, pp. 90–93Google Scholar.