Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:01:50.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hermeneutics in Modern Theology: Some Doctrinal Reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

John Webster
John Webster
Affiliation:
Christ Church, Oxford OX1 1DP, EnglandUK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The territory indicated by my title is impossibly vast, and some delimitations are in order at the beginning. What follows does not attempt any kind of thorough or nuanced historical analysis of the great tangle of issues to which the terms of the title refer. ‘Hermeneutics’ and ‘modern theology’ don't exist as simple entities; the terms are shorthand ways of identifying very complex traditions of thought and cultural practices, and a serious attempt to trace those traditions and the variations in their relationship would be little short of a history of Western Christian thought since the rise of nominalism. What is offered here is more restricted and precise, chiefly an essay in Christian dogmatics. At its simplest, my proposal is that the Christian activity of reading the Bible is most properly (that is, Christianly) understood as a spiritual affair, and accordingly as a matter for theological description. That is to say, a Christian description of the Christian reading of the Bible will be the kind of description which talks of God and therefore talks of all other realities sub specie divinitatis. There is certainly an historical corollary to this proposal — namely, the need for some account of why the dominant traditions of Western Protestantism (and more recently of Western Catholicism) have largely laid aside, or at least lost confidence in, this kind of dogmatic depiction of the church's reading of the Bible, replacing it with, or annexing it to, hermeneutical theory of greater or lesser degrees of sophistication and greater or lesser degrees of theological content.

Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , August 1998 , pp. 307 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Geffré, C., The Risk of Interpretation. On Being Faithful to the Christian Tradition in a Non–Christian Age (Paulist Press, New York, 1987)Google Scholar.

2 Dupré, L., Passage to Modernity. An Essay in the Hermeneutics of Nature and Culture (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1993), p. 9Google Scholar.

3 Gill and MacMillan, Dublin, 1988, German original J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1986.

4 SCM, London, 1994.

5 Theological Hermeneutics, p. 8.

6 Ibid., p. 137.

7 Ibid., p. 136.

8 Ibid., p. 137.

9 Text and Interpretation, p. xvii.

10 The Analogical Imagination. Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism (SCM, London, 1981)Google Scholar.

11 Plurality and Ambiguity. Hermeneutics, Religion, Hope (Harper & Row, New York, 1987)Google Scholar.

12 T & T Clark, Edinburgh, 1994.

13 Westminster, Philadelphia, 1981.

14 See for example, many of the contributions to Braaten, C.E., Jenson, R.W., ed., Reclaiming the Bible for the Church (Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1995)Google Scholar.

15 Ricoeur, P., ‘The Task of Hermeneutics’, in Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981), p. 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Ibid.

17 Taylor, C., Sources of the Self. The Making of Modem Identity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1989), p. 36Google Scholar.

18 Elwes, R.H.M., ed., The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, Vol. 1 (Bell, London, 1883), p. 8Google Scholar.

19 Bruns, G.L., Inventions. Writing, Textuality and Understanding in Literary History (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1982), p. xiiGoogle Scholar.

20 Theologico–potitical Treatise, p. 8.

21 Wood, C., The Formation of Christian Understanding, p. 16Google Scholar.

22 Bruns, , Inventions, p. xiGoogle Scholar.

23 Ibid.

24 Ibid., p. 12; cf. also C. Wood, op. cit., pp. 53f.: ‘There is no understanding in general, of which every achieved understanding is an instance’. More generally, I am indebted to the emphasis on action theory in interpretation in various works by Wolterstorff, N., notably Works and Worlds of Art (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980)Google Scholar; and Divine Discourse. Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)Google Scholar.

25 Donfried, K.P., ‘Alien Hermeneutics and the Misappropriation of Scripture’, in Braaten, C.E., Jenson, R.W., ed., Reclaiming the Bible, p. 23Google Scholar.

26 Church Dogmatics III/4 (T&T Clark, Edinburgh, 1961), pp. 18, 23Google Scholar; in The Christian Life. Church Dogmatics IV/4. Lecture Fragments (T &T Clark, Edinburgh, 1981), p. 6Google Scholar, the phrase is ‘formed and contoured reference’. The context is Barth's depiction of the moral situation as an encounter between the commanding God and the obedient human covenant partner, a situation which is not a variant upon some primary ethical situation, but simply itself. It is a much less heavily theoretical cousin to Geertz's (and Ryle's) ‘thick description’.

27 Geertz, C., ‘Introduction’, in Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (Harper, New York, 1983), p. 5Google Scholar.

28 Theology Today 43 (1986), pp. 361–76.

29 Ibid., p. 362.

30 Ibid., p. 374.

31 Ibid., p. 372.

32 Theology Today 43 (1986), pp. 377–82.

33 Ibid., p. 378.

34 Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991, pp. 165–73.

35 Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61 (1993), pp. 41–56Google Scholar.

36 Yale University Press, New Haven, 1992.

37 Ibid., p. 38.

38 Ibid., p. 39.

39 Ibid., p. 45.

40 For a brief critique of the notion of ‘using’ the Bible, from the standpoint of divine priority, see Gunton, C., ‘Using and Being Used: Scripture and Systematic Theology’, Theology Today 47 (1990), pp. 248–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, 1985.

42 Church Dogmatics IV/3 (T & T Clark, Edinburgh, 1963), p. 8Google Scholar. The context of this is Barth's extensive recovery of the prophetic office of Christ in Church Dogmatics IV/3. It is worth recording that this doctrine offers a fruitful dogmatic context within which to expound a theology of the Bible. The older Protestant dogmatics customarily treated the Bible in two places: first (and primarily) in the locus de revelatione, and second (with much less intensity), in the treatment of the munus prophelicum Christi, where the mediating functions of Bible and church proclamation were discussed. When handled in the first locus, the Bible often became too tied up with the foundational enterprise of seeking indubitable foundations for knowledge, as well as with the rationalistic method of deducing proofs for doctrines from Biblical propositions. Handled in the second context, however, the Bible is much more happily related to the living presence and activity of the risen Christ.

43 Modem Theology 2 (1986), pp. 197–212.

44 Ibid., p. 199.

45 Ibid., p. 208.

46 Church Dogmatics I/1 (T & T Clark, Edinburgh, 1975), p. 139Google Scholar.

47 Jenson, R.W., ‘Hermeneutics and the Life of the Church’, in Braaten, C.E. and Jenson, R.W., ed., Reclaiming the Bible for the Church, p. 93Google Scholar.

48 Gadamer, H.-G., Philosophical Hermeneutics (Universityof California Press, Berkeley, 1976), p. 5Google Scholar.

49 The discussion of theological hermeneutics in Hodgson, P., Winds of the Spirit. A Constructive Christian Theology (Westminster John Knox Press, Louisville, 1994), pp. 10–14Google Scholar, is a standard recent example.

50 Frei, H., The Identity of Jesus Christ. The Hermeneutical Bases of Dogmatic Theology (Fortress Press, Philadelphia, 1975), p. 34Google Scholar.

51 Further on the implications of the notion of Christus praesens for hermeneutics, see Ritschl, D., Memory and Hope. An Inquiry Concerning the Presence of Christ (MacMillan, New York, 1967), esp. pp. 61fGoogle Scholar.

52 Torrance, T.F., Divine Meaning. Studies in Patristic Hermeneutics (T & T Clark, Edinburgh, 1995), p. 5Google Scholar.

53 Jeanrond, W., Text and Interpretation, pp. 7fGoogle Scholar.

54 Ibid., p. 8.

55 Ibid., pp. xvif.

56 Though he is rather wide of the mark in including Barth's account among them: Theological Hermeneutics, p. 136.

57 Cf. Williams, R., ‘The Literal Sense of Scripture’, Modern Theology 7 (1991), pp. 121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Doctrinal Criticism: Some Questions’, in Coakley, S., Pailin, D., ed., The Making and Remaking of Christian Doctrine. Essays in Honour of Maurice Wiles (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1993), pp. 239–264Google Scholar; ‘Does It Make Sense to Speak of Pre-Nicene Orthodoxy’, in Williams, R., ed., The Making of Orthodoxy. Essays in Honour of Henry Chadwick (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990), p. 1–23Google Scholar.

58 Wolterstorff, N., Divine Discourse, p. 187Google Scholar.

59 Ibid., p. 18.

60 Barth's reluctance to talk of the Bible as directly God's Word is set out by Wolterstorff, , Divine Discourse, pp. 63–74Google Scholar; a somewhat crisper account is found in McCormack, B., ‘Historical–Criticism and Dogmatic Interest in Karl Barth's Theological Exegesis of the New Testament’, Lutheran Quarterly 5 (1991), pp. 211–225, esp. p. 220Google Scholar. For a deep analysis of the wider issue, see Jungel, E., The Doctrine of the Trinity. God's Being Is in Becoming (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1976), pp. 47–55Google Scholar.

61 Kelsey, D.H., ‘The Bible and Christian Theology’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 48 (1980), p. 396Google Scholar.

62 Jeanrond, W., Text and Interpretation, p. 103Google Scholar.

63 A favourite phrase of Jüngel, E., here cited from ‘The Dogmatic Significance of the Question of the Historical Jesus’, in Theological Essays II (T &T Clark, Edinburgh, 1995), p. 91Google Scholar, where it is being used to talk of the disturbing quality of revelation.

64 Morgan, R., with Barton, J., Biblical Interpretation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988), p. 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf.pp. 270f.

65 See here Berkouwer's, G.C. excellent discussion of perspicuity in Holy Scripture (Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1975), pp. 267–298Google Scholar.

66 Jeanrond, W., Text and Interpretation, p. 104Google Scholar.

67 Ibid.

68 Watson, F., Text, Church and World, p. 3Google Scholar.

69 Taylor, C., ‘Theories of Meaning’, in Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985), p. 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For analysis of some of the consequences of this for issues in theology and hermeneutics, see Lundin, R., The Culture of Interpretation. Christian Faith and the Postmodern World (Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1993), esp. the title essay, pp. 31–52Google Scholar; Kerr, F., Theology after Wittgenstein (Blackwell, Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar.

70 Descartes, R., Discourse on the Method, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, trans Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985), p. 115Google Scholar.

71 Steiner, G., ‘In a Post–Culture’, in Extraterritorial. Papers on Literature and the Language Revolution (Athenaeum, New York, 1971), p. 156Google Scholar.

72 Taylor, C., ‘Overcoming Epistemology’, in Philosophical Arguments, p. 9Google Scholar.

73 On Christian Doctrine, Preface, 4 (T & T Clark, Edinburgh, 1883), p. 2Google Scholar.

74 Ibid., 2.10 (p. 39).

75 Calvin, J., Institutes of the Christian Religion I.vi.i, ed. McNeill, J.T. (Westminster, Philadelphia, 1960) vol. 1, p. 71Google Scholar.

76 Torrance, T.F., Divine Meaning. Studies in Patristic Hermeneutics (T & T Clark, Edinburgh, 1995), p. 8Google Scholar.

77 Torrance's, T.F. definition of Calvin's use of the term in The Hermeneutics of John Calvin (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1988), p. 163Google Scholar.

78 Wolterstorff, N., Divine Discourse, p. 239Google Scholar.

79 Kenny, A., The Self (Marquette University Press, Milwaukee, 1988), p. 31Google Scholar.

80 See here Thiselton, A.C., ‘Knowledge, Myth and Corporate Memory’ in Doctrine Commission of the Church of England, Believing in the Church. The Corporate Nature of Faith (SPCK, London, 1981), pp. 45–78Google Scholar.

81 For two twentieth–century examples from my own Anglican tradition of talk about the church which is rooted very directly in talk of God, see Ramsey, A.M., The Gospel and the Catholic Church (Longmans, Green, London, 1936)Google Scholar, and MacKinnon, D.M., The Church of God (Dacre Press, London, 1940)Google Scholar. On the former, see Williams, R., ‘Theology and the Churches’, in Gill, R., Kendall, L., eds., Michael Ramsey as Theobgian (Darton, Longman and Todd, London, 1995), pp. 9–28Google Scholar; on the latter, see Wignall, P., ‘D.M. MacKinnon: An Introduction to His Early Theological Writings’, New Studies in Theology 1 (1980), pp. 75–94Google Scholar.

82 Augustine, , On Christian Doctrine, II. 9Google Scholar.

83 Ibid.

84 Ibid., III. 1.

85 Ibid., IV.33.